Advertisement

Depth EEG Recordings in Epileptic Patients During Hypnotic and Non-Hypnotic States

  • G. De Benedittis
  • V. A. Sironi

Abstract

In the study of epileptic patients medically resistant, who are potential candidates for surgical treatment, depth EEG recording has been used for many years for the exact delimitation of the epileptogenic lesion. To our knowledge, hypnosis has never been induced in epileptic patients during EEG study. This neurosurgical diagnostic procedure offers a unique opportunity of obtaining fundamental information on the possible neurophysiological mechanisms implied in human hypnosis.

Observations were carried out on 3 consecutive patients affected by medically resistant partial seizures with elementary and/or complex symptomatology. Chronic deep electrode study explored rhinen-cephalic structures as well as specific target areas of the cerebral cortex.

Background electrical activity during the hypnotic state showed a significant decrease of slow and increase of alpha and beta rhythm, with a constant increase of amplitude, as compared with the non-hypnotic state. Focal interictal abnormalities were dramatically reduced by the hypnotic trance. Moreover depth EEG study during sleep in one patient indicated that the EEG patterns during hypnosis and sleep are basically different, confirming that there is no convincing evidence of physiological similarities between the two states.

Keywords

Epileptic Patient Alpha Rhythm Epileptogenic Lesion Hypnotic State Hypnotic Susceptibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, M.B., 1959, Brain functions in hypnosis, Int.J.clin.exp. Hypnosis, 7:109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bancaud, J. and Talairach, J., 1965, La stéréo-électroencéphalographie dans l’epilepsie. Paris, Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, T.X. and Calverley, D.S., 1963, “Hypnotic-like” suggestibility in children and adults, J.abn.soc.Psychol., 66:589–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, T.X. and Glass, L.B., 1962, Significant factors in hypnotic behavior, J.abn.soc.Psychol., 64:222–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crasilneck, H.B., McCranie, E.J. and Jenkins, M.T., 1956, Special indications for hypnosis as a method of anesthesia, JAMA, 162:1606–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engstrom, D.R., 1976, Hypnotic susceptibility, EEG-alpha and self-regulation, in “Consciousness and Self-regulation. Advances in Research”, G.E. Schwartz and D. Shapiro, eds., Vol.1, 173–221, London, Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans, F.J., 1972, Hypnosis and sleep: techniques for exploring cognitive activity during sleep, in: “Hypnosis: research developments and perspectives”, E. Fromm and R.E. Shor, eds., 43–83, Chicago, Aldine.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, F.J., 1979, Hypnosis and sleep: techniques for exploring cognitive activity during sleep, in “Hypnosis: developments in research and new perspectives”. 2nd ed., E. Fromm and R.E. Shor, eds., 139–183, Chicago, Aldine.Google Scholar
  9. Goldie, L., 1967, Psychosomatic relations in hypnosis and epilepsy, in: “Hypnosis and Psychosomatic Medicine”, J. Lassner, ed., 105–125, Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Hilgard, J.R., 1970, Personality and hypnosis: a study of imaginative involvement, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jasper, H.H. and Shagass, C., 1941, Conditioning the occipital alpha rhythm in man, J.exp.Psychol., 28:373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kamiya, J., 1968, Conscious control of brain waves. Psychology Today, April. 57–50.Google Scholar
  13. Kamiya, J., 1969, Operant control of the EEG alpha rhythm and some of its reported effects on consciousness, in “Altered states of consciousness: a book of readings”, C. Tart, ed., 509–517, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Kubie, L.S., 1961, Hypnotism: a focus for psychophysiological and psychoanalytical investigations, Arch.gen.Psychiat., 4:40–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCabe, W.S. and Habovick, J.A., 1963, Thorazine as an epileptogenic agent. Am.J.Psychiat., 120:595–596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, N.E., 1969, Learning of visceral and glandular responses, Science, 163:434–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olton, D.S. and Noonberg, A.R., 1980, Biofeedback. Clinical applications in behavioral medicine, New York, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 252–283.Google Scholar
  18. Schwab, R.S. and Young, R.R., 1973, Electroencephalography, in: “Neurological Surgery”, Vol.1, J.R. Youmans, ed., Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Co., 334–357.Google Scholar
  19. Sterman, M.B., 1973, Neurophysiologic and clinical studies of sensorimotor EEG biofeedback training: some effects on epilepsy, in : “Biofeedback: behavioral medicine”, L. Birk, ed., New York, Grune and Stratton, 147–165.Google Scholar
  20. Sterman, M.B., 1977, Effects of sensorimotor EEG feedback training on sleep and clinical manifestations of epilepsy, in: “Biofeedback and Behavior”, J. Beatty and H. Legewie, eds., New York, Plenum Pub1. Corp., 167–200.Google Scholar
  21. Talairach, J., Bancaud, J., Szikla, G., Bonis, A., Geier, S. and Vedrenne, C., 1974, Approche nouvelle de la neurochirurgie de l’épilepsie. Méthode stéréotaxique et résultats thérapeutiques, Neurochirurgie, 20, suppl.1:1–240.Google Scholar
  22. Ulett, G.A., Akpinar, S., and Itil, T.M., 1972, Quantitative EEG analysis during hypnosis, Electroenceph.clin.Neurophysiol., 33:361–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. De Benedittis
    • 1
  • V. A. Sironi
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Milan PoliclinicoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations