Skip to main content

Diagnosis and the Concept of Mental Illness

  • Chapter
Social Psychiatry
  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

In 1938, doctors Jules Masserman and Hugh Carmichael published a paper in The Journal of Mental Science entitled “Diagnosis and Prognosis in Psychiatry.”1 In this paper they reported that in a series of 100 inpatients followed up one year after discharge, over 40% required a “major revision” of their prior diagnosis. Another study, by A. T. Boisen,2 published that same year in the journal Psychiatry, reported huge variations in diagnoses of sub-types of dementia praecox (the name commonly used at the time for what we now call schizophrenia) between different states in the U.S., and even between different hospitals in the same state. For example, in one hospital in Illinois, 76% of dementia praecox patients were considered hebephrenic, while in another hospital in the same state only 11% of dementia praecox patients were diagnosed as hebephrenic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.Masserman and H. Carmichael, Diagnosis and prognosis in psychiatry, J. of Mental Science, 84: 893–946 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.T. Boisen, Types of dementia praecox: A study in psychiatric classification, Psychiatry, 1: 23–236 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Boisen, Types of dementia praecox: A study in psychiatric classification, Psychiatry,Press, New York (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.T. Beck, Reliability of psychiatric diagnosis: 1. A critique of systematic studies, Am. J. Psychiatry, 119: 210–216 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N.Rosenzweig, S. G. Vandenberg, K. Moore and A. Dukay, Am. J. Psychiatry, 117: 1102 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Raines and J. H. Rohrer,Am. J. Psychia-try, 110: 721 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B.Pasamanick, S. Dinitz and M. Lefton, Am. J.Psychiatry, 116: 127 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.H. Ward, A. T. Beck, M. Mendelson, J. E.Mock and J. K. Erbaugh, The Psychiatric Nomenclature, Archives of General Psychiatry, 7: 198–205 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M.D. Wilson and E. Meyer, Diagnostic consistency in a psychiatric liaison service, Am. J. Psychiatry, 119: 207–209 (1962).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. M.M. Katz, J. O. Cole and W. E. Barton, eds. Barton, eds.,“The Role and Methodology of Classification in Psychiatry and Psychopathology”, Public Health Service Publication 1584, U. S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Katz, Cole, and Barton (eds), op cit, p. 553, cf. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Zubin, Perspectives on the Conference, in: Katz, Cole and Barton (eds), op cit., cf. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Rosenzweig et al., A study of the reliability of the mental status examination, Am. J. Psychiatry; 117: 1102 (1961).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wing et al., Reliability of a procedure for measuring and classifying “Present psychiatric state,” Br. J. Psychiatry, 113: 499–515 (1967).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. T. B. Karasu, What therapy for which patient? Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 32: 519 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. W. Gerard, Units and concepts of biology, Science, 125: 429–433 (1957).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. O. Temkin, The history of classification in the medical sciences, in: Katz, Cole and Barton, eds., op. cit., cf. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Boissier de Sauvages, in: “Nosologia Methodica”, C. F. Daniel, ed., t. 1., Schwickert, Leipzig (1790), Prolegomena, article 74:p. 33, quoted in: O. Temkin. op. cit., cf. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. G. Langsley, Presidential Address: Today’s teachers and tomorrow’s psychiatrists, Am. J. Psychiatry, 138: 1013–1016 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Cullen, “Nosology” (anonymous English translation from Latin), Bell and Bradfrite, Edinburgh (1810), quoted in: O. Temkin, cf. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. W. Gerard, Supplementary comments, in: Katz, Cole and Barton (eds), op cit., cf. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Hamilton, Discussant’s remarks, in: Katz, Cole and Barton (eds), op cit, cf. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Zubin, Perspectives on the Conference, in: Katz, Cole and Barton (eds), op cit., cf. 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosenzweig, N. (1984). Diagnosis and the Concept of Mental Illness. In: Hudolin, V. (eds) Social Psychiatry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4535-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4535-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4537-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4535-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics