Skip to main content

Repair in Fertilized Eggs of Mice and its Role in the Production of Chromosomal Aberrations

  • Chapter
DNA Repair and Mutagenesis in Eukaryotes

Part of the book series: Basic Life Sciences ((BLSC,volume 15))

Summary

The fertilized egg may influence the yield of dominant-lethal mutations produced from chemical treatment of male postmeiotic germ cells to a small or large extent depending upon the mutagen used and the competence of the egg to repair the premutational lesions induced. The strain of females has little influence on the yield of dominant-lethal mutations induced by triethylenemelamine or ethyl methane-sulfonate in spermatids and spermatozoa, but it has a large influence in the case of isopropyl methanesulfonate. In addition to this difference, triethylenemelamine and ethyl methanesulfonate induce high levels of heritable translocations at these germ cell stages whereas isopropyl methanesulfonate is practically ineffective, even though doses of these chemicals produced comparable levels of dominant-lethal mutations. These differences between ethyl methanesulfonate and triethylenemelamine on one hand and isopropyl methanesulfonate on the other were hypothesized to be a function of the types of chromosomal lesions present at the time of repair activity and whether or not chromosomal aberrations were already fixed at the time of postfertilization pronuclear DNA synthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bürki, K., and W. Sheridan, Expression of TEM-induced damage to postmeiotic stages of spermatogenesis of the mouse during early embryogenesis. II. Cytological investigations, Mutat. Res., 52 (1978) 107–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Generoso, W. M., K. T. Cain, S. W. Huff, and D. G. Gosslee, Inducibility by chemical mutagens of heritable translocations in male and female germ cells of mice, In: Advances in Modern Toxicology, Vol. 5, W. G. Flamm and M. A. Mehlman, Eds., Hemisphere Publishing Co., Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Generoso, W. M., K. T. Cain, M. Krishna, and S. W. Huff, Repair in the egg of chemically induced genetic lesions in spermatozoa and spermatids of mice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.), 56 (1979) 435–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Generoso, W. M., S. W. Huff, and S. K. Stout, Chemically induced dominant-lethal mutations and cell killing in mouse oocytes in the advanced stages of follicular development, Mutat. Res., 11 (1971) 411–420.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Generoso, W. M., S. W. Huff, and K. T. Cain, Relative rates at which dominant-lethal mutations and heritable translocations were induced by alkylating chemicals in postmeiotic male germ cells of mice, Genetics, 93 (1979) 163–171.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Generoso, W. M., W. L. Russell, S. W. Huff, S. K. Stout, and D. G. Gosslee, Effects of dose on the induction of dominantlethal mutants and heritable translocations with ethyl methanesulfonate in male mice, Genetics, 77 (1974) 741–752.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lemontt, J., Genetic and physiological factors affecting repair and mutagenesis in yeast, This volume, p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pedersen, R. A., and B. Brandriff, Radiation and drug-induced DNA repair in mammalian oocytes and embryos, This volume, p. 389.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Russell, W. L., Radiation and chemical mutagenesis and repair in mice, In: Molecules and Cellular Processes, R. F. Beers, Jr., R. M. Herriott and R. C. Tilghman, Eds., John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1972, pp. 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sega, G. A., Relationship between unscheduled DNA synthesis and mutation induction in male mice, This volume, p. 373.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, P. D., R. D. Snyder, and R. L. Dusenbery, Isolation and characterization of repair-deficient mutants of Drosophila melanogaster, This volume, p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Swift, M., and C. Chase, Cancer in families with xeroderma pigmentosum, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 62 (1979) 1415–1421.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Swift, M., L. Sholman, M. Perry, and C. Chase, Malignant neoplasms in the families of patients with ataxiatelangiectasia, Cancer Res., 36 (1976) 209–215.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Generoso, W.M. (1980). Repair in Fertilized Eggs of Mice and its Role in the Production of Chromosomal Aberrations. In: Generoso, W.M., Shelby, M.D., de Serres, F.J. (eds) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis in Eukaryotes. Basic Life Sciences, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3842-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3842-0_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3844-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3842-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics