Skip to main content

Decontamination for Continued Operation: An Industry-Wide Approach

  • Chapter
Decontamination and Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
  • 205 Accesses

Abstract

Several reasons are discussed why decontamination is desirable now, and will become increasingly necessary in future years. It is recommended that an industry-wide strategy be developed to cope with radiation problems in general and decontamination requirements in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.E. LeSurf, Control of Radiation Exposures at CANDU Nuclear Power Stations, J. Brit. Nuclr. Energy Soc., 16, No. 1, pp. 53–61 (Jan. 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Montford, Decontamination by Cycling Techniques at the Douglas Point Nuclear Generating Station, Proc. Am. Pwr. Conf., 35, pp. 902–914 (Mar. 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Flynn, W. Nelson, W. Warner, D. McCormick, Thermal Sleeve Failure and Repairs–Indian Point #1 Nuclear Unit (285 MW), Nuclear Technology, 25, pp. 13–31 (Jan. 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 26, Pergamon Press, 1, No. 3 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biological Effects of Ionising Radiation, III Report, prepared by the BEIR Committee for the National Academy of Sciences (May 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Risks Associated with Nuclear Power: A Critical Review of the Literature - Summary and Synthesis Chapter, prepared by the Committee on Literature Survey of Risks Associated with Nuclear Power for the NAS Committee on Science and Public Policy (May 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Rohner, G.E. Casey, Decontaminating Heat Exchange Equipment Enhances Personnel Safety for Maintenance, Power, pp. 82–85 (Dec. 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.J. Pettit, J.E. LeSurf, W.B. Stewart, R.J. Strickert, S.B. Vaughan, Decontamination of the Douglas Point Reactor by the CAN-DECON Process, CORROSION/78 Conference, Paper No. 39 (Mar. 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Van der Linde, A.C. Letsch, E.M. Hornsveld, Some bservations on Pitting Corrosion in the Zircaloy Cladding of Fuel Pins Irradiated in a PWR Loop, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation Report No. ECN-51 (Nov. 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.F. Taylor, Heat Exchanger Tubing Materials for CANDU Nuclear Generating Stations, Proc. Nuclr. Congress of Rome, pp. 251–266 (Mar. 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.A. Ross-Ross, E.J. Adams, D.F. Dixon, R. Metcalfe, Performance and Reliability of Primary Circuit Components in CANDU Reactors, Proc. 1st European Nuclr. Conf. (Apr. 1975), Progress in Nuclear Energy series, Pergamon Press, 6 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  12. G.G. Legg, Reducing Radiation Exposure in CANDU Power Plants, Technical Paper No. 5/22 at NUCLEX 75 (Oct. 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Hedgran, B. Lindell, PQR - A Special Way of Thinking?, Health Physics, 19, p. 121 (Jul. 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  14. H.J. Dunster, A.S. McLean, The Use of Risk Estimates in Setting and Using Basic Radiation Protection Standards, Health Physics, 19, p. 121 (Jul. 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.J. Cohen, Plowshare: New Challenge for Health Physicist, Health Physics, 19, pp. 633–639 (Nov. 1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Wilson, Man-rem, Economics and Risk in the Nuclear Power Industry, Nuclear News, pp. 28–30 (Feb. 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  17. New NRC Ruling Provides Appendix 1 Compliance, Nuclear News, pp. 38–39 (Oct. 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Wilson, G.A. Vivian, C. Bieber, D.A. Watson, G.G. Legg, Man-rem Expenditure and Management in Ontario Hydro Nuclear Power Stations, presented at the 20th Anniversary Meeting of the Health Physics Society (Jul. 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Bieber, A Methodology for Costing Man-rem, Ontario Hydro Report (Unclassified), HPD-76–4 (Mar. 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Collins, R.A. James, Design Worth of Radiation Exposure Reduction, Proc. of the 5th Intnl Conf. on Reactor Shielding, pp. 309–316 (Apr. 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Beninson, Modern Trends in Radiation Protection, presented at the Topical Review Meeting on Water Chemistry and Materials in Nuclear Reactors, organized by the Argentine Atomic Energy Commission (Buenos Aires) (Apr. 1979)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

LeSurf, J.E., Tilbe, H.E. (1980). Decontamination for Continued Operation: An Industry-Wide Approach. In: Osterhout, M.M. (eds) Decontamination and Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3710-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3710-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3712-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3710-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics