Advertisement

The Current Status of Paternity Testing

  • Angelyn A. Konugres

Abstract

Blood consists of four components: erythrocytes, leukocytes, platelets, and plasma. Each blood component exhibits individual differences demonstrable by either immunologic or physico-chemical methods. These individual differences in the molecular structures of blood constituents are governed by genes or chromosomes and are generally known as allotypes, phenotypes, or simply types. Types which are genetically related have been assigned to the same system. The number of systems and specificities currently being used by some laboratories in paternity testing are listed in Table I.

Keywords

Blood Group Adenylate Kinase Blood Group Antigen Paternity Testing Blood Group System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Race, R.R. and Sanger, R., Blood groups in man, ed. 1–5, F.A. Davis, Philadelphia, (1968).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sussman, L.N., “Blood Grouping Tests. Medico-Legal Uses,” Charles C. Thomas, Springfield (1968).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Konugres, A.A. and Polesky, H.F., Use of blood groups in paternity testing, in “Paternity Testing,” Amer. Soc. Clin. Pathol., H.F. Polesky (ed), Chicago (1975), p. 1.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schatkin, S.B., “Disputed Paternity Proceedings,” 4th Ed., M. Bender, New York (1967).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Polesky, H.F., “Paternity Testing,” Amer. Soc. Clin. Pathol, Chicago (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weiner, A.S., “Blood Groups and Transfusion,” 3rd ed., Charles C. Thomas, Springfield (1943).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sussman, L.N., Titration and scoring in disputed parentage. Transfusion 5: 248 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polesky, H.F., Pitfalls in paternity testing. Laboratory Medicine, in “Paternity Testing,” Amer. Soc. Clin. Pathol., p. 28, H.F. Polesky (ed. ), Chicago (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiner, A.S., Problems and pitfalls in blood grouping tests for non-parentage. l. Distribution of the blood groups. Amer. J. Clin. Pathol. 41: 9 (1969).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weiner, A.S., Problems and pitfalls in blood grouping tests for disputed parentage. III. Chances of proving non-paternity by blood grouping tests when the putative father is dead. Acta Genet. Med. Gemmellol 18: 285 (1969).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boyd, W.C., Compact tubular presentation of mother-child-alleged father combinations which establish non-paternity in the Rh blood group system, Vox. Sang. (OS) 5: 99 (1955).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allen, F.H., Corcoran, P.A., Kenton, H.B. et al, Mg, a new blood group antigen in the MNS system. Vox. Sang. 3: 81 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hopkinson, D.A., Spencer, N. and Harris, H., Red cell acid phosphatase variants: a new human polymorphism, Nature 199: 969 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harris, H., Enzyme polymorphisms in man, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. 164: 298 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fuhrman, W., and Lichte, K.H., Human red cell acid phosphatase polymorphism: a study on gene frequency and forensic use of the system in cases of disputed paternity. Humangenetik 3: 121 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giblett, E.R., “Genetic Markers in Human Blood,” F.A. Davis, Philadelphia (1969).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Monn, E., Application of the phosphoglucomutase (PGM) system of human red cells in paternity cases. Vox. Sang. 16: 211 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Broman, P., Grundin, R. and Lins, P.E., The red cell acid phosphatase polymorphism in Sweden: gene frequencies and application to disputed paternity. Acta Genet. Med. Gemollol. 20: 77 (1971).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smithies, O., Zone electrophoresis in starch gels; group varia-tions in the serum proteins of normal human adults, Biochem. J. 61: 629 (1955).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Allison, A.C. and Blumberg, B.S., An isoprecipitation reaction distinguishing human serum protein types, Lancet 1: 634 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Butler, R., Isoantigenicity of human plasma proteins, “Bibliotheca Haematologica” No. 31, S. Karger, Basel (1969).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prokop, O., Human Blood and Serum Groups, Wiley Interscience, 1969.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schultz, H.E. and Hermans, J.F.,“Molecular Biology of Human Proteins,” Vol. 1., Elsevier, Amsterdam (1966) p. 173.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weitkamp, L.R., An electrophoretic comparison of human serum al-bumin variants: Eight distinguishable types. Human Heredity 19: 159, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 35:953 (1966).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Steinberg, A.G., Globulin polymorphisms in man. Ann. Rev. Genet. 3: 25 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grubb, R., “The Genetic Markers of Human Immunoglobulins,” Springer-Verla, New York (1970).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ellis, F.R., Camp, F.R. and Litwin, S.D., “Application of Gm Typing to Paternity Exclusion,” AABB 23rd Ann. Meet., San Francisco (1970).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Allen, F., Corcoran, P.A., Kenton, H.B. Et al, Joint report of Fourth International Histocompatibility Workshop, in “Histocompatibility Testing,” P.I. Terasaki (ed.), Munksgaard, Copenhagen, p. 17 (1970).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kissmeyer-Nielsen, F., Genetics of the HL-A system in a seminar on histocompatibility testing. Amer. Assoc. Blood Banks, p. 7–20 (1970).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Walford, R.L., A seminar on histocompatibility testing, Amer. Assoc. Blood Banks, p. 37 (1970).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Histocompatibility Testing 1972. Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee, C.L., Estimation of the likelihood of paternity, in. “Paternity Testing,” Amer. Soc. Clin. Pathol., p. 28, H.F. Polesky (ed. ), Chicago (1975).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lombard, J.F., Family law, adoption, paternity and blood tests, Massachusetts Practice, l: part 2, (1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angelyn A. Konugres
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Boston Hospital for WomenUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolUSA

Personalised recommendations