Advertisement

Genetic Differences in “g” and Real Life

  • Sandra Scarr
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 14)

Abstract

Despite the author’s substantial agreement with the spirit of presentations by Professors Eysenck and Humphreys, arguments about the extremity of their views and their certainty are presented. In the author’s research on twins and adopted children, there are important age differences in the effects of home environments and important differences in the effect of environments on tests of academic achievement, aptitude, and IQ. The confident claims that there is one important general ability and one figure for the heritability of intelligence are disputed.

Keywords

Adoptive Parent Biological Child Adopted Child Natural Mother Twin Correlation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

References

  1. Benton, A. L. The Revised Visual Retention Test, Form C, Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown, 1963.Google Scholar
  2. Burgemeister, B. B., Blum, L. H., and Lorge, I. Columbia Mental Maturity Scale. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1959.Google Scholar
  3. Carter-Saltzman, L., and Scarr, S. MZ or DZ? Only your blood grouping laboratory knows for sure. Behavior Genetics, 1977, 7(4), 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunn, L. M. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1959.Google Scholar
  5. Eysenck, H. J. The nature of intelligence. Paper presented at the NATO International Conference on Intelligence and Learning,” University of York, England, July 16, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Humphreys, L. G. The primary mental ability. Paper presented at the NATO International Conference on Intelligence and Learning, University of York, England, July 16, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. Jencks, C. Inequality; A reassessment of the effects of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. Kamin, L. J. The science and politics of IQ. New York: John Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. Lytton, H. Do parents create, or respond to, differences in twins? Developmental Psychology, 1977, 13(5), 456–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Plomin, R., Willerman, L., and Loehlin, J. C. Resemblance in appearance and the equal environments assumption in twin studies of personality traits. Behavior Genetics, 1976, 6, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Raven, J. C. Standard Progressive Matrices: Sets A, B, C, D, and E. London: Lewis, 1958.Google Scholar
  12. Scarr, S. Environmental bias in twin studies. Eugenics Quarterly, 1968, 15, 34–40Google Scholar
  13. Scarr, S. IQ: Race, social class and individual differences, new studies of old problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, in press, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. Scarr, S., and Carter-Saltzman, L. Twin Method: Defense of a critical assumption. Behavior Genetics, in press, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. Scarr, S., and Weinberg, R. A. IQ test performance of black children adopted by white families. American Psychologist, 1976, 726–739.Google Scholar
  16. Scarr, S., and Weinberg, R. A. Intellectual similarities within families of both adopted and biological children. Intelligence, 1977, 1(2), 170–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scarr, S., and Weinberg, R. A. The influence of “family background” on intellectual attainment. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43, 674–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scarr, S., and Weinberg, R. A. Nature and nurture strike (out) again. Intelligence, 1979, 3, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stevenson, H. W., Hale, G. A., Klein, R. E., and Miller, L. K. Interrelations and correlates in children’s learning and problem solving. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1968, 33(7), Serial No. 123.Google Scholar
  20. Willerman, L., Horn, J. M., and Loehlin, J. C. The aptitudeachievement test distinction: a study of unrelated children reared together. Behavior Genetics, 1977, 7, 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. 1.
    Scarr, S., Scarf, E., and Weinberg, R. A. perceived and actual similarities in biological and adoptive families: Does perceived similarity bias genetic inferences? Unpublished paper, Yale University, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scarr, S. Heritability and Educational Policy: Genetic and Environmental Effects on IQ, Aptitude and Achievement. Invited address presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York City, September 1, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Scarr
    • 1
  1. 1.Yale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations