Skip to main content

Genetic Differences in “g” and Real Life

  • Chapter
Intelligence and Learning

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((HF,volume 14))

Abstract

Despite the author’s substantial agreement with the spirit of presentations by Professors Eysenck and Humphreys, arguments about the extremity of their views and their certainty are presented. In the author’s research on twins and adopted children, there are important age differences in the effects of home environments and important differences in the effect of environments on tests of academic achievement, aptitude, and IQ. The confident claims that there is one important general ability and one figure for the heritability of intelligence are disputed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

References

  • Benton, A. L. The Revised Visual Retention Test, Form C, Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgemeister, B. B., Blum, L. H., and Lorge, I. Columbia Mental Maturity Scale. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter-Saltzman, L., and Scarr, S. MZ or DZ? Only your blood grouping laboratory knows for sure. Behavior Genetics, 1977, 7(4), 273–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. The nature of intelligence. Paper presented at the NATO International Conference on Intelligence and Learning,” University of York, England, July 16, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L. G. The primary mental ability. Paper presented at the NATO International Conference on Intelligence and Learning, University of York, England, July 16, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. Inequality; A reassessment of the effects of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamin, L. J. The science and politics of IQ. New York: John Wiley, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytton, H. Do parents create, or respond to, differences in twins? Developmental Psychology, 1977, 13(5), 456–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., Willerman, L., and Loehlin, J. C. Resemblance in appearance and the equal environments assumption in twin studies of personality traits. Behavior Genetics, 1976, 6, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. Standard Progressive Matrices: Sets A, B, C, D, and E. London: Lewis, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. Environmental bias in twin studies. Eugenics Quarterly, 1968, 15, 34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. IQ: Race, social class and individual differences, new studies of old problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, in press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S., and Carter-Saltzman, L. Twin Method: Defense of a critical assumption. Behavior Genetics, in press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S., and Weinberg, R. A. IQ test performance of black children adopted by white families. American Psychologist, 1976, 726–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S., and Weinberg, R. A. Intellectual similarities within families of both adopted and biological children. Intelligence, 1977, 1(2), 170–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S., and Weinberg, R. A. The influence of “family background” on intellectual attainment. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43, 674–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S., and Weinberg, R. A. Nature and nurture strike (out) again. Intelligence, 1979, 3, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. W., Hale, G. A., Klein, R. E., and Miller, L. K. Interrelations and correlates in children’s learning and problem solving. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1968, 33(7), Serial No. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willerman, L., Horn, J. M., and Loehlin, J. C. The aptitudeachievement test distinction: a study of unrelated children reared together. Behavior Genetics, 1977, 7, 465–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Scarr, S., Scarf, E., and Weinberg, R. A. perceived and actual similarities in biological and adoptive families: Does perceived similarity bias genetic inferences? Unpublished paper, Yale University, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scarr, S. Heritability and Educational Policy: Genetic and Environmental Effects on IQ, Aptitude and Achievement. Invited address presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York City, September 1, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scarr, S. (1981). Genetic Differences in “g” and Real Life. In: Friedman, M.P., Das, J.P., O’Connor, N. (eds) Intelligence and Learning. NATO Conference Series, vol 14. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1083-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1083-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-1085-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-1083-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics