Abstract
We study in an stochastic intertemporal general equilibrium the implications on stabilization and welfare indicators of alternative financing schemes of unemployment benefits. The question we ask is whether or not an unemployment benefits institution can insure workers against macroeconomic risk within the business cycle.
In the model, imperfect competition on the good market and monopoly unions at the firm level are responsible for unemployment. The budgetary constraint of the unemployment benefits institution can be fulfilled with respect to four different scenarii: unemployment benefits, social contribution rate on workers (employed or not), social contribution rate on firms or debt may adjust in the business cycle. For each of these scenarii, we compute the unconditional distribution of workers wealth in the economy, where workers differ with respect to their probability of becoming employed. This individual probability is assumed to be smaller if the worker was unemployed the period before. We can compute the consequences on all the welfare distribution moments of the alternative financing scenarii.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. Atkeson and C. Phelan. Reconsidering the costs of business cycles with incomplete markets. Working paper 4719, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1994.
O.J. Blanchard and C. Kahn. The solution of linear difference models under rational expectations. Econometrica, 48(5): 1305–1311, July 1980.
O.J. Blanchard and N. Kiyotaki. Monopolistic competition and the effect of aggregate demand. American Economic Review, 77(4):647–666, September 1987.
D. Fougère and T. Kamionka. Mobilité et précarisation sur le marché du travail: une analyse longitudinale pour les années 1986 à 1988. Economie et Prévision, 102–103, 1992.
J.O. Hairault, F. Langot and F. Portier. On the Effectiveness of Automatic Stabilizers. miméo, Macroéconomie et Analyse des Déséquilibres. Université de Paris I, 1995.
J.O. Hairault and F. Portier. Money, New-Keynesian macroeconomics and the business cycle. European Economic Review, 37(8): 1533–1568.
G. Hansen and A. Imrohoroglu. The role of unemployment insurance in an economy with liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 100:118–142, 1992.
R. King, C. Plosser and S. Rebelo. Production Growth and Business Cycles: Technical Appendix. Working paper, University of Rochester, 1987. Revised May 1990.
R.E.Jr Lucas. Models of Business Cycles. miméo, The Yrjo Jahnson Lectures, Helsinki, 1985.
J. Rotemberg and M. Woodford. Dynamic general equilibrium models with imperfectly competitive product markets. In T. Cooley, editor, Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hairault, JO., Langot, F., Portier, F. (1997). Financing Unemployment Benefits in the Business Cycle: Stabilization, Welfare and Equity Issues. In: Hairault, JO., Hénin, PY., Portier, F. (eds) Business Cycles and Macroeconomic Stability. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6173-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6173-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7830-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-6173-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive