Skip to main content

Business Cycles and Macroeconomic Stability

Should We Rebuild Built-in Stabilizers?

  • Book
  • © 1997

Overview

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (14 chapters)

  1. Fiscal Policies, Business Cycle and Growth

  2. Automatic Stabilizers in an Economic Union

  3. Stabilization and Labour Market Policies

  4. Empirical Evidence, Recent Trends and Problems on Stabilization

Keywords

About this book

Setting the issue "Most economists consider the marked increase in automatic stabilizers a highly favorable development with respect to maintenance of economic stability". Besides the rare privilege of having being signed by both Milton Friedman and Paul Samuelson (Depres,Friedman, Hart, Samuelson, and Wallace [1950]), among others, this sentence expressed as soon as 1950 the consensus view on the stabilizing effect of fiscal rules governing tax revenue and public expendi­ tures and transfers. This positive ex ante assessment will have been confirmed ex post as part of the explanation for post war stabilization (Burns [1960], de Long and Summers [1986], Moore and Zarnovitz [1986]). However, it becomes disputed in both its positive and normative aspects. Many institutional changes since the eighties point at curbing back the transfer mechanisms underlying automatic stabilizers, and legal restraints on deficits such as the US balanced budget amendment or the European Maastricht criteria would involve serious risks for the future of stabilizers. Under such rules "the government would become, almost inevitally, a destabilizer rather than a stabilizer" said Joseph Stiglitz, quoted by the New York Times (April 1995)). "Built-in stabilizers are automatic fiscal adjustments that reduce the national income multiplier and thus cushion the effects of changes in autonomous spend­ ing on the level of income" (Pechman [1987]). Early analyses of the automatic fiscal stabilizers include the contributions of A. G. Hart [1945], R. Musgrave and M. Miller (1948) and E. C. Brown (1955).

Editors and Affiliations

  • CEPE-Université de Lille I, France

    Jean-Oliver Hairault

  • MAD-Université de Paris I, France

    Jean-Oliver Hairault, Pierre-Yves Hénin, Franck Portier

  • CEPREMAP, France

    Pierre-Yves Hénin

  • Université de Rouen, CEPREMAP, France

    Franck Portier

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: Business Cycles and Macroeconomic Stability

  • Book Subtitle: Should We Rebuild Built-in Stabilizers?

  • Editors: Jean-Oliver Hairault, Pierre-Yves Hénin, Franck Portier

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6173-6

  • Publisher: Springer New York, NY

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

  • Copyright Information: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

  • Hardcover ISBN: 978-0-7923-9907-0Published: 30 April 1997

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-1-4613-7830-3Published: 04 October 2012

  • eBook ISBN: 978-1-4615-6173-6Published: 06 December 2012

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: XXV, 341

  • Topics: Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics, Economic Growth, Public Economics

Publish with us