Overview
- Editors:
-
-
Jean-Oliver Hairault
-
CEPE-Université de Lille I, France
MAD-Université de Paris I, France
-
Pierre-Yves Hénin
-
MAD-Université de Paris I, France
CEPREMAP, France
-
Franck Portier
-
MAD-Université de Paris I, France
Université de Rouen, CEPREMAP, France
Access this book
Other ways to access
Table of contents (14 chapters)
-
-
Fiscal Policies, Business Cycle and Growth
-
-
- Jim Dolmas, Gregory W. Huffman
Pages 3-29
-
- Steve Ambler, Emanuela Cardia
Pages 31-53
-
- Steven P. Cassou, Kevin J. Lansing
Pages 55-78
-
-
Automatic Stabilizers in an Economic Union
-
Front Matter
Pages 107-107
-
- Kenneth M. Kletzer, Willem H. Buiter
Pages 109-147
-
- Tamim Bayoumi, Paul R. Masson
Pages 149-170
-
- Jürgen von Hagen, George W. Hammond
Pages 171-188
-
- Frédérique Bec, Jean-Olivier Hairault
Pages 189-208
-
Stabilization and Labour Market Policies
-
Front Matter
Pages 209-209
-
-
- Jean-Olivier Hairault, François Langot, Franck Portier
Pages 231-251
-
Empirical Evidence, Recent Trends and Problems on Stabilization
-
Front Matter
Pages 253-253
-
- Jean-Philippe Cotis, Bruno Crepon, Yannick L’Horty, Renaud Méary
Pages 255-280
-
- Bertrand Candelon, Pierre-Yves Hénin
Pages 281-300
-
- Ray Barrell, Nigel Pain, James Sefton
Pages 301-319
-
- Ali H. Bayar, André Dramais, Werner Roeger, Jan In’t Veld
Pages 321-336
-
Back Matter
Pages 337-341
About this book
Setting the issue "Most economists consider the marked increase in automatic stabilizers a highly favorable development with respect to maintenance of economic stability". Besides the rare privilege of having being signed by both Milton Friedman and Paul Samuelson (Depres,Friedman, Hart, Samuelson, and Wallace [1950]), among others, this sentence expressed as soon as 1950 the consensus view on the stabilizing effect of fiscal rules governing tax revenue and public expendi tures and transfers. This positive ex ante assessment will have been confirmed ex post as part of the explanation for post war stabilization (Burns [1960], de Long and Summers [1986], Moore and Zarnovitz [1986]). However, it becomes disputed in both its positive and normative aspects. Many institutional changes since the eighties point at curbing back the transfer mechanisms underlying automatic stabilizers, and legal restraints on deficits such as the US balanced budget amendment or the European Maastricht criteria would involve serious risks for the future of stabilizers. Under such rules "the government would become, almost inevitally, a destabilizer rather than a stabilizer" said Joseph Stiglitz, quoted by the New York Times (April 1995)). "Built-in stabilizers are automatic fiscal adjustments that reduce the national income multiplier and thus cushion the effects of changes in autonomous spend ing on the level of income" (Pechman [1987]). Early analyses of the automatic fiscal stabilizers include the contributions of A. G. Hart [1945], R. Musgrave and M. Miller (1948) and E. C. Brown (1955).