Skip to main content

Selection of a battery of microbiotests for various purposes—the Czech experience

  • Chapter
New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring

Abstract

Microbiotests are a useful tool in acute toxicity investigations for pre-screening and screening of chemicals and wastes; tests based on enzymatic activity may be useful as a signal for chronic toxicity. The composition of a battery of microbiotests is function of the problem(s) under consideration. A battery of microbioassays should in principle be composed of representatives of the producers (algae, higher plants), consumers (mostly Zooplankton or zooedaphon invertebrates), and decomposers (bacteria or fungi). The selection of the test species and the design of the bioassay depends on the origin and the characteristics of the sample. Soil or sediment samples, coloured or turbid samples of surface and wastewaters, or totally transparent samples from deep-well monitoring systems, all require different approaches. Microbiotests for the detection of specific toxicants, such as screening for microphyte toxins is an another example of a situation where careful selection of the testing procedure is necessary, bearing in mind time and cost benefits, as well as ecological reliability. Well-experienced ecotoxicologists should be capable of selecting the right test organisms and design from a broad spectrum of microbiotests, in order to give a correct interpretation of the ecotoxicological results obtained for specific problems. This paper reviews and comments on the microbioassays available to date for toxicity screening of chemicals and wastes, based on their own experience in the Czech Republic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Algaltoxkit F™ 1996. Freshwater toxicity test with microalgae. Standard Operatonal Procedure. Creasel, Deinze, Belgium. 28 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitton G., Garland E., Kong I., Morel J. R. and Koopman B. 1995. A direct solid phase assay specific for heavy metal toxicity. Environ.Contam.Toxicol. 27:25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitton G., Rhodes K. and Koopman B. 1996. Ceriofast™: An acute toxicity test based on Ceriodaphnia dubia feeding behaviour. Environ. Toxicol.Chem. 15:123–125.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day C., Dutka B.J., Kwan K.K., Batista N., Reynoldson T.B. and Metcalfe-Smith J.L. 1995. Correlations between solid-phase microbial screening assays, whole-sediment toxicity tests with macroinvertebrates and in situ benthic community structure. J. Great Lakes Res. 21:192–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daphtoxkit F™ magna. 1996. Crustacean toxicity screening test for freshwater. Standard Operational Procedure. Creasel, Deinze, Belgium. 16 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daphtoxkit F™ pulex 1996. Crustacean toxicity screening test for freshwater. Standard Operational Procedure. Creasel, Deinze, Belgium. 17 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHA 1997. Biocide Monitor II. Instructions for use. ECHA Microbiology Ltd., Cardiff, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen C.R. and Persoone G. 1993. Rapid toxicity screening tests for aquatic biota. 1. Methodology and experiments with Daphnia magna. Environ. Toxicol.Chem. 12:711–717.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilroy A. and Gray N.F. 1995. Treatability, toxicity and biodegradability test methods. Biol.Rev. 70:243–275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan K.K. 1995. Direct sediment toxicity testing procedure using sediment-chromotest kit. Environ.Toxicol. Water Qual. 9:193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legault R., Blaise C., Rokosh D. and Chong-Kit R. 1994. Comparative assessment of the SOS Chromotest Kit and the Mutatox test with the Salmonella plate incorporation (Ames test) and Fluctuation tests for screening genotoxic agents. Environ.Toxicol.Water Qual. 9:45–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D., Chau Z.K. and Dutka B.J. 1989. Rapid toxicity assessment of water-soluble and water-insoluble chemicals using a modified agar plate method. Water Res. 23:333–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Persoone G. 1998a. Development and first validation of a„Stock culture free“ algal microbiotest: the Algaltoxkit. In Wells P.G., Lee K. and Blaise C., eds, Microscale Testing in Aquatic Toxicology: Advantages, Techniques and Practice. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persoone G. 1998b. Development and validation of Toxkit microbiotests with invertebrates, in particular crustaceans. In Wells P.G., Lee K. and Blaise C., eds, Microscale Testing in Aquatic Toxicology: Advantages, Techniques and Practice. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 437–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson S.M. and Stauber J.L. 1996. New algal enzyme bioassay for the rapid assessment of aquatic toxicity. Bull.Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 65:750–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protoxkit F™ 1998. Freshwater toxicity test with a ciliate protozoan. Standard Operational Procedure. Creasel, Deinze, Belgium. 18 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao S.S. and Lifshitz R. 1995. The Muta-ChromoPlate Method for measuring mutagenicity of environmental samples and pure chemicals. Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual. 10:307–313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rojicková R., Marsálek B., Dutka B. and Mclnnis R. 1997. Bioassays used for detection of ecotoxicity at contaminated areas. In Proceedings of NATO advanced research Workshop environmental contamination and remediation practices at former and present military bases, Vilnius, October 12-17 1997, pp 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojicková-Padrtová R., Marsálek B. and Holoubek I. 1998. Evaluation of alternative and standard toxicity assays for toxicity screening of environmental samples: Selection of an optimal test battery. Chemosphere 37(3):495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samoiloff R., Schulz S., Jordan Y. and Arnott E. 1980. A rapid simple long-term toxicity assay for aquatic contaminants using the nematode Panagrellus redivivus. Can.J.Fish.Aquat.Sci. 37:1167–1174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samson G. and Popovic R 1988. Use of algal fluorescence for determination of phytotoxicity of heavy metals and pesticides as environmental pollutants. Ecotox.Environ.Safe. 16:272–278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snell T.W. and Janssen C.R 1998. Microscale toxicity testing with rotifers. In Wells P.G., Lee K. and Blaise C., eds, Microscale Testing in Aquatic Toxicology: Advantages, Techniques and Practice. CRC Press LLC., Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • St-Laurent D. and Blaise C.R. 1992. Validation of a microplate-based algal lethality test developed with the help of flow cytometry. In Richardson M., ed, Environmental toxicology assessment. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 136–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thamnotoxkit F™ 1995. Crustacean toxicity screening test for freshwater. Standard Operational Procedure. Creasel, Deinze, Belgium. 23 pages.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marsálek, B., Rojícková-padrtová, R. (2000). Selection of a battery of microbiotests for various purposes—the Czech experience. In: Persoone, G., Janssen, C., De Coen, W. (eds) New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4289-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4289-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6924-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4289-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics