Abstract
Microbiotests are a useful tool in acute toxicity investigations for pre-screening and screening of chemicals and wastes; tests based on enzymatic activity may be useful as a signal for chronic toxicity. The composition of a battery of microbiotests is function of the problem(s) under consideration. A battery of microbioassays should in principle be composed of representatives of the producers (algae, higher plants), consumers (mostly Zooplankton or zooedaphon invertebrates), and decomposers (bacteria or fungi). The selection of the test species and the design of the bioassay depends on the origin and the characteristics of the sample. Soil or sediment samples, coloured or turbid samples of surface and wastewaters, or totally transparent samples from deep-well monitoring systems, all require different approaches. Microbiotests for the detection of specific toxicants, such as screening for microphyte toxins is an another example of a situation where careful selection of the testing procedure is necessary, bearing in mind time and cost benefits, as well as ecological reliability. Well-experienced ecotoxicologists should be capable of selecting the right test organisms and design from a broad spectrum of microbiotests, in order to give a correct interpretation of the ecotoxicological results obtained for specific problems. This paper reviews and comments on the microbioassays available to date for toxicity screening of chemicals and wastes, based on their own experience in the Czech Republic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Algaltoxkit F™ 1996. Freshwater toxicity test with microalgae. Standard Operatonal Procedure. Creasel, Deinze, Belgium. 28 pages.
Bitton G., Garland E., Kong I., Morel J. R. and Koopman B. 1995. A direct solid phase assay specific for heavy metal toxicity. Environ.Contam.Toxicol. 27:25–28.
Bitton G., Rhodes K. and Koopman B. 1996. Ceriofast™: An acute toxicity test based on Ceriodaphnia dubia feeding behaviour. Environ. Toxicol.Chem. 15:123–125.
Day C., Dutka B.J., Kwan K.K., Batista N., Reynoldson T.B. and Metcalfe-Smith J.L. 1995. Correlations between solid-phase microbial screening assays, whole-sediment toxicity tests with macroinvertebrates and in situ benthic community structure. J. Great Lakes Res. 21:192–206.
Daphtoxkit F™ magna. 1996. Crustacean toxicity screening test for freshwater. Standard Operational Procedure. Creasel, Deinze, Belgium. 16 pages.
Daphtoxkit F™ pulex 1996. Crustacean toxicity screening test for freshwater. Standard Operational Procedure. Creasel, Deinze, Belgium. 17 pages.
ECHA 1997. Biocide Monitor II. Instructions for use. ECHA Microbiology Ltd., Cardiff, England.
Janssen C.R. and Persoone G. 1993. Rapid toxicity screening tests for aquatic biota. 1. Methodology and experiments with Daphnia magna. Environ. Toxicol.Chem. 12:711–717.
Kilroy A. and Gray N.F. 1995. Treatability, toxicity and biodegradability test methods. Biol.Rev. 70:243–275.
Kwan K.K. 1995. Direct sediment toxicity testing procedure using sediment-chromotest kit. Environ.Toxicol. Water Qual. 9:193–196.
Legault R., Blaise C., Rokosh D. and Chong-Kit R. 1994. Comparative assessment of the SOS Chromotest Kit and the Mutatox test with the Salmonella plate incorporation (Ames test) and Fluctuation tests for screening genotoxic agents. Environ.Toxicol.Water Qual. 9:45–57.
Liu D., Chau Z.K. and Dutka B.J. 1989. Rapid toxicity assessment of water-soluble and water-insoluble chemicals using a modified agar plate method. Water Res. 23:333–339.
Persoone G. 1998a. Development and first validation of a„Stock culture free“ algal microbiotest: the Algaltoxkit. In Wells P.G., Lee K. and Blaise C., eds, Microscale Testing in Aquatic Toxicology: Advantages, Techniques and Practice. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 311–320.
Persoone G. 1998b. Development and validation of Toxkit microbiotests with invertebrates, in particular crustaceans. In Wells P.G., Lee K. and Blaise C., eds, Microscale Testing in Aquatic Toxicology: Advantages, Techniques and Practice. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 437–449.
Peterson S.M. and Stauber J.L. 1996. New algal enzyme bioassay for the rapid assessment of aquatic toxicity. Bull.Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 65:750–757.
Protoxkit F™ 1998. Freshwater toxicity test with a ciliate protozoan. Standard Operational Procedure. Creasel, Deinze, Belgium. 18 pages.
Rao S.S. and Lifshitz R. 1995. The Muta-ChromoPlate Method for measuring mutagenicity of environmental samples and pure chemicals. Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual. 10:307–313.
Rojicková R., Marsálek B., Dutka B. and Mclnnis R. 1997. Bioassays used for detection of ecotoxicity at contaminated areas. In Proceedings of NATO advanced research Workshop environmental contamination and remediation practices at former and present military bases, Vilnius, October 12-17 1997, pp 72–78.
Rojicková-Padrtová R., Marsálek B. and Holoubek I. 1998. Evaluation of alternative and standard toxicity assays for toxicity screening of environmental samples: Selection of an optimal test battery. Chemosphere 37(3):495–507.
Samoiloff R., Schulz S., Jordan Y. and Arnott E. 1980. A rapid simple long-term toxicity assay for aquatic contaminants using the nematode Panagrellus redivivus. Can.J.Fish.Aquat.Sci. 37:1167–1174.
Samson G. and Popovic R 1988. Use of algal fluorescence for determination of phytotoxicity of heavy metals and pesticides as environmental pollutants. Ecotox.Environ.Safe. 16:272–278.
Snell T.W. and Janssen C.R 1998. Microscale toxicity testing with rotifers. In Wells P.G., Lee K. and Blaise C., eds, Microscale Testing in Aquatic Toxicology: Advantages, Techniques and Practice. CRC Press LLC., Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 409–422.
St-Laurent D. and Blaise C.R. 1992. Validation of a microplate-based algal lethality test developed with the help of flow cytometry. In Richardson M., ed, Environmental toxicology assessment. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 136–155.
Thamnotoxkit F™ 1995. Crustacean toxicity screening test for freshwater. Standard Operational Procedure. Creasel, Deinze, Belgium. 23 pages.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marsálek, B., Rojícková-padrtová, R. (2000). Selection of a battery of microbiotests for various purposes—the Czech experience. In: Persoone, G., Janssen, C., De Coen, W. (eds) New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4289-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4289-6_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6924-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4289-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive