Advertisement

Timeo Danaos et Dona Ferentes: A Philosophical-Cum-Epistemological Critique of the Critical Systems Perspective

  • Haridimos Tsoukas

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is first to outline a synopsis of the main tenets of the critical systems perspective (CSP), and second to provide a philosophical-cum-epistemological critique of its claims. The thesis that will be advanced here is largely unsympathetic towards CSP. The latter is beset by a number of philosophical-cum-episteiriological, logical, and sociological errors which render its central claims problematic. However, in the extremely limited space of this article only the philosophical-cum-epistemologloal aspects of CSP will be considered.

Keywords

System Thinking Contingency View False Consciousness Claim Problem Critical System Thinking 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beer, S., 1985, “Diagnosing The System For Organizations”, J. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  2. Castoriadis, C., 1975, “L’Institution imaginaire de la societe”, Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Fay, B., 1975, “Social Theory and Political Practice”, G. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Flood, R., 1990a, A new decade a new spirit, Syst. Pract., 3:331:335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Flood, R., 1990b, Liberating systems theory: Toward critical systems thinking, Hum. Rel., 43:49–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flood, R. and Ulrich, W., 1990, Testaments to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practitioners, Syst. Pract., 3:7:30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuenmayor, R., 1990, Systems thinking and critique: I. What is critique?, Syst. Pract., 3:525–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Habermas, J., 1987, “The Theory of Communicative Action”, Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayek, F.A., 1988, “The Fatal Conceit”, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofstadter, D.R., 1979, “Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid”, Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson, M.C., 1987, New directions in management science, in: “New Directions in Management Science”, M. C. Jackson and P. Keys, eds., Gower, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  12. Jackson, M.C., 1990a, The critical kernel in modern systems thinking, Syst. Pract., 3:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson, M.C., 1990b, Beyond a system of systems methodologies, J. Opl. Res. Soc., 41:657–668Google Scholar
  14. Jackson, M.C. and Keys, P., 1984, Towards a system of systems methodologies, J. Opl. Res. Soc., 33:473–486Google Scholar
  15. Keys, P., 1988, A methodology for methodology choice, Syst. Res., 5:65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolakowski, L., 1978, “Main Currents of Marxism”, Oxfod University Press, Oxford, Volume 3Google Scholar
  17. Mingers, J.C., 1980, Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: Critical theory and socft systems methodology, J. Appl. Syst. Anal., 7:41–49Google Scholar
  18. Oliga, J., 1988, Methodological foundations of systems methodologies, Syst. Pract., 1:87–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Popper, K., 1961, “The Poverty of Historicism”, Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Popper, K., 1966, “The Open Society and its Enemies”, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Vol.1Google Scholar
  21. Rorty, R., 1989, “Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity”, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., and Janik, A., 1984, “An Introduction to Reasoning”, Macmillan, New York, 2nd EditionGoogle Scholar
  23. Whitley, R., 1989, Knowledge and practice in the management and policy sciences, Working Paper, No.174, Manchester Business SchoolGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haridimos Tsoukas
    • 1
  1. 1.Warwick Business SchoolUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations