Abstract
The purpose of this paper is first to outline a synopsis of the main tenets of the critical systems perspective (CSP), and second to provide a philosophical-cum-epistemological critique of its claims. The thesis that will be advanced here is largely unsympathetic towards CSP. The latter is beset by a number of philosophical-cum-episteiriological, logical, and sociological errors which render its central claims problematic. However, in the extremely limited space of this article only the philosophical-cum-epistemologloal aspects of CSP will be considered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beer, S., 1985, “Diagnosing The System For Organizations”, J. Wiley, Chichester
Castoriadis, C., 1975, “L’Institution imaginaire de la societe”, Seuil, Paris
Fay, B., 1975, “Social Theory and Political Practice”, G. Allen & Unwin, London
Flood, R., 1990a, A new decade a new spirit, Syst. Pract., 3:331:335
Flood, R., 1990b, Liberating systems theory: Toward critical systems thinking, Hum. Rel., 43:49–75
Flood, R. and Ulrich, W., 1990, Testaments to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practitioners, Syst. Pract., 3:7:30
Fuenmayor, R., 1990, Systems thinking and critique: I. What is critique?, Syst. Pract., 3:525–544
Habermas, J., 1987, “The Theory of Communicative Action”, Polity Press, Cambridge
Hayek, F.A., 1988, “The Fatal Conceit”, Routledge, London
Hofstadter, D.R., 1979, “Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid”, Penguin, London
Jackson, M.C., 1987, New directions in management science, in: “New Directions in Management Science”, M. C. Jackson and P. Keys, eds., Gower, Aldershot
Jackson, M.C., 1990a, The critical kernel in modern systems thinking, Syst. Pract., 3:357–364
Jackson, M.C., 1990b, Beyond a system of systems methodologies, J. Opl. Res. Soc., 41:657–668
Jackson, M.C. and Keys, P., 1984, Towards a system of systems methodologies, J. Opl. Res. Soc., 33:473–486
Keys, P., 1988, A methodology for methodology choice, Syst. Res., 5:65–76
Kolakowski, L., 1978, “Main Currents of Marxism”, Oxfod University Press, Oxford, Volume 3
Mingers, J.C., 1980, Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: Critical theory and socft systems methodology, J. Appl. Syst. Anal., 7:41–49
Oliga, J., 1988, Methodological foundations of systems methodologies, Syst. Pract., 1:87–112
Popper, K., 1961, “The Poverty of Historicism”, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Popper, K., 1966, “The Open Society and its Enemies”, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Vol.1
Rorty, R., 1989, “Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., and Janik, A., 1984, “An Introduction to Reasoning”, Macmillan, New York, 2nd Edition
Whitley, R., 1989, Knowledge and practice in the management and policy sciences, Working Paper, No.174, Manchester Business School
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tsoukas, H. (1991). Timeo Danaos et Dona Ferentes: A Philosophical-Cum-Epistemological Critique of the Critical Systems Perspective. In: Jackson, M.C., Mansell, G.J., Flood, R.L., Blackham, R.B., Probert, S.V.E. (eds) Systems Thinking in Europe. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3748-9_62
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3748-9_62
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6669-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3748-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive