Skip to main content

Timeo Danaos et Dona Ferentes: A Philosophical-Cum-Epistemological Critique of the Critical Systems Perspective

  • Chapter
Systems Thinking in Europe
  • 296 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is first to outline a synopsis of the main tenets of the critical systems perspective (CSP), and second to provide a philosophical-cum-epistemological critique of its claims. The thesis that will be advanced here is largely unsympathetic towards CSP. The latter is beset by a number of philosophical-cum-episteiriological, logical, and sociological errors which render its central claims problematic. However, in the extremely limited space of this article only the philosophical-cum-epistemologloal aspects of CSP will be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beer, S., 1985, “Diagnosing The System For Organizations”, J. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, C., 1975, “L’Institution imaginaire de la societe”, Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, B., 1975, “Social Theory and Political Practice”, G. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R., 1990a, A new decade a new spirit, Syst. Pract., 3:331:335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R., 1990b, Liberating systems theory: Toward critical systems thinking, Hum. Rel., 43:49–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. and Ulrich, W., 1990, Testaments to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practitioners, Syst. Pract., 3:7:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R., 1990, Systems thinking and critique: I. What is critique?, Syst. Pract., 3:525–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., 1987, “The Theory of Communicative Action”, Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A., 1988, “The Fatal Conceit”, Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D.R., 1979, “Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid”, Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.C., 1987, New directions in management science, in: “New Directions in Management Science”, M. C. Jackson and P. Keys, eds., Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.C., 1990a, The critical kernel in modern systems thinking, Syst. Pract., 3:357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.C., 1990b, Beyond a system of systems methodologies, J. Opl. Res. Soc., 41:657–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.C. and Keys, P., 1984, Towards a system of systems methodologies, J. Opl. Res. Soc., 33:473–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, P., 1988, A methodology for methodology choice, Syst. Res., 5:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolakowski, L., 1978, “Main Currents of Marxism”, Oxfod University Press, Oxford, Volume 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J.C., 1980, Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: Critical theory and socft systems methodology, J. Appl. Syst. Anal., 7:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga, J., 1988, Methodological foundations of systems methodologies, Syst. Pract., 1:87–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K., 1961, “The Poverty of Historicism”, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K., 1966, “The Open Society and its Enemies”, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Vol.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R., 1989, “Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., and Janik, A., 1984, “An Introduction to Reasoning”, Macmillan, New York, 2nd Edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R., 1989, Knowledge and practice in the management and policy sciences, Working Paper, No.174, Manchester Business School

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tsoukas, H. (1991). Timeo Danaos et Dona Ferentes: A Philosophical-Cum-Epistemological Critique of the Critical Systems Perspective. In: Jackson, M.C., Mansell, G.J., Flood, R.L., Blackham, R.B., Probert, S.V.E. (eds) Systems Thinking in Europe. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3748-9_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3748-9_62

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6669-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3748-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics