Abstract
Consumer research involving the assessment of products, be they food, beverages, fragrances or household products, traditionally takes the form of the paired preference test, preference ranking or hedonic scaling, usually on two, but sometimes three or four products. The tests are generally easy to conduct, easy to analyse, and are generally thought to give a good measure of relative acceptance or product preference. However this type of research does suffer from several disadvantages, the most important of which is that it can be very limited in providing clear diagnostic information about why a product performs the way that it does. The reasons for this are several-fold:
-
Consumers have a very limited vocabulary when it comes to describing their perceptions of products.
-
what this book tries to do
-
They often use attribute scales incorrectly and are subject to various biases when completing questionnaires.
-
Interpretation of paired test data can be more difficult than it first appears.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beale, E.M.L. and Little, R.J.A. (1975) Missing Values in multivariate analysis. J.R. Statist. Soc. B, 37, 129–45.
Bockenholt, I. and Gaul, W. (1986) Analysis of choice behaviour via probabilistic ideal point and vector models. Applied Stochastic models and Data Analysis,2, 209–26.
Carroll, J.D. (1972) Individual differences and multidimensional scaling, in R.N. Shepard, A.K. Romney, and S.B. Nerlove (eds) Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 1, Seminar Press, New York, pp. 105–55.
Chang, J.J. and Carroll, J.D. (1968) How to use MDPREF, a computer program for multidimensional analysis of preference data. Unpublished report, Bell Telephone Laboratories.
Clapperton, J.F. and Piggott, J.R. (1979) Differentiation of ale and lager flavours by principal components analysis of flavour characterisation data J. Institute of Brewing, 85, 271–4.
De Soete, G. and Carroll, J.D. (1983) A Maximum Likelihood Method for fitting the wandering vector model. Psychometrika, 48, 553–6.
Efron, B. (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jack-knife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26.
Girard, R.A. and Cliff, N. (1976) A Monte-Carlo evaluation of interactive multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 44, 69–74.
Jedidi, K. and DeSarbo W.S. (1991) A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the spatial representation of three-mode three-way pick any/J data. Psychometrika, 56, 471–94.
Jones, P.N., MacFie, H.J.H., and Beilken, S.L. (1989) Use of preference mapping to relate consumer preference to the sensory properties of a processed meat product (tinned cat food). J. Sci. Food Agric, 47, 113–23.
Kakamura, W.A. and Srivastava, R.K. (1986) An ideal-point probabilistic choice model for heterogeneous preferences. Marketing Sciences, 5, 199–218.
King, B. and Arents, P. (1991) A statistical test of consensus derived from generalised procrustes analysis of sensory data. J. Sensory Studies, 6, 1, 37–48.
MacFie, H.J.H., Bratchell, N., and Greenhoff, K.G., and Vallis, L.V. (1989) Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. J. Sensory Studies, 4, 129–48.
Nute, G.R., MacFie, H.J.H., and Greenhoff, K. (1989) Practical application of preference mapping, in D.M.H. Thomson (ed.) Food Acceptability, Elsevier, London, pp. 377–86.
Piggott, J.R. and Sharman, K. (1986) Methods to aid interpretation of multidimensional data, in J.R. Piggott (ed.) Statistical Procedures in Food Research, Elsevier, London, pp. 181–232.
Schiffman, S.S., Reynolds, M.L., and Young, F.W. (1981) Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling, Academic Press, New York.
Takane, Y. and Shibayama, T. (1991) Principal Component Analysis with external information on both subjects and variables. Psychometrika, 56, 97–120.
Whelehan, O.P., MacFie, H.J.H., and Baust, N.G. (1987) Use of individual differences scaling for sensory studies: Simulated recovery of structure under various missing value rated and error levels. J. Sensory Studies, 1, 1–8.
Williams, E.J. (1949) Experimental designs for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Austral. J. Sci. Res. Ser. A, 2, 149–68.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greenhoff, K., MacFie, H.J.H. (1994). Preference mapping in practice. In: MacFie, H.J.H., Thomson, D.M.H. (eds) Measurement of Food Preferences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2171-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2171-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5908-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2171-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive