Skip to main content

Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation and Induction of Graft-Versus-Malignancy

  • Chapter
Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation

Part of the book series: Cancer Treatment and Research ((CTAR,volume 110))

Abstract

The high dose chemotherapy and radiation typically used as the preparative regimen for bone marrow transplantation produces considerable morbidity and mortality, and limits the use of this modality to a minority of patients who are young and in good general medical condition. Recent experimental and clinical data indicate that, in addition to the cytotoxic effect of the preparative regimen, an immune-mediated effect significantly contributes to the therapeutic benefit of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. This has been well documented in animal models1,2 and in human clinical transplantation. Higher risk of relapse goes after T-cell-depleted 3,4 or syngeneic transplant.5,6 Also there is reduced risk of leukemia relapse in patients with acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).7,8 Elimination of residual disease, as detected by cytogenetics or polymerase chain reactions techniques in diseases such as chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) which may take six to twelve months after transplant presumably due to an ongoing graft-versus-leukemia effect.9 Withdrawal of immunosuppression given for prevention of GVHD can occasionally lead to restoration of remission in patient relapsing after transplants.10 However, the most direct evidence of this graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) effect is the observation that infusion of donor lymphocytes can re-induce remission in patients who relapse after allogeneic transplantation.11,12 This GVM has been shown in myeloid diseases where is has been most effective against CML and to a lesser extent in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). They have also been shown in multiple myeloma13,14 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL),15 low grade lymphoma16 and solid tumors.17,18

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bortin MM, Rimm AA, Saltztein EC: Graft versus leukemia: Quantification of adoptive immunotherapy in murine leukemia.Science1973, 179:811–813.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Truiit R, LeFever A, Shih CY: Graft-versus leukemia reactions: Experimental models and clinical trials. InProgress in Bone marrow Transplantation.Edited by Gale RP, Champlin RE, New York: Alan R Liss; 1987:219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Horowitz M, Gale R, Sondel PM, et al.: Graft-versus leukemia reactions after bone marrow transplantation.Blood1990, 75:555–562.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldman J, Gale R, Horowitz MM, et al.: Bone marrow transplantation for chronic phase: increased risk of relapse associated with T-cell depletion. Ann Intern Med 1988, 108:806–814.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fefer A, Cheever MA, Greenberg PD: Identical-twin bone marrow (syngeneic) transplantation for hematologic cancers.J Natl Cancer Inst1986, 76:1269–1271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gale RP, Horowitz MM, Ash RC, et al.: Identical twin bone marrow transplantation or leukemia.Ann Intern Med1994, 120:646–652.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiden P, Flournoy N, Thomas E, et al.: Antileukemic effect of graftversus-host disease in human recipients of allogeneic marrow grafts.N EnglJMed1979, 300:1068–1073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sullivan K, Storb R, Bucker CD, et al.: Graft-versus-host disease as adoptive immunotherapy in patients with advanced hematologic neoplasms.NEngl JMed1989, 320:828–834.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Radich JP, Gehly G, Gooley T, et al.: Polymerase chain reaction detection of the BCR-ABL fusion transcript after allogeneic marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: role of polymerase chain reaction in predicting relapse.Blood1991, 77:874–878.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Collins RG, Rogers ZR, Bennet M, et al.: Hematologic relapse of chronic myelogenous leukemia following allogeneic transplantation: apparent graft-versus-leukemia effect following abrupt discontinuation of immunosuppression.Bone Marrow Transplant1992, 10:391–395.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolb HJ, Schattenberg A, Goldman JM, et al.: Graft-versus-leukemia effect of donor lymphocyte infusions in marrow grafted patients.Blood1995, 86:2041–2050.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins RH, Shpilberg O, Drobyski WR, et al.: Donor leukocyte infusions in 140 patients with relapsed malignancy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.J Clin Oncol1997, 15:433–444.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tricot G, Vesole DH, Jagannath S, et al.: Graft-versus-myeloma effect: proof of principal.Blood1996, 87:1196–1198.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lokhorst HM, Schattenberg A, Comelissen JJ, et al.: Donor leukocyte infusions are effective in relapsed multiple myeloma after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.Blood1997, 90:4206–4211.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rondon G, Giralt S, Huh Y, et al.: Graft-versus-leukemia effect after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Bone Marrow Transplant1996, 18:669–672.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Khouri I, Keating MJ, Korbling M, et al.: Transplant lite: Induction of graft vs malignancy using fludarabine based nonablative chemotherapy and allogeneic progenitor-cell transplantation as treatment for lymphoid malignancies.J Clin Oncol1998, 16:2817–2824.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ueno NT, Rondon G, Mizra NQ, et al.: Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor-cell transplantation for poor-risk patients with metastatic breast cancer.J Clin Oncol1998, 16:986–993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Childs R, Clave E, Contentin N, et al.: Engraftment kinetics after nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: full donor T-cell chimerism precedes alloimmune responses.Blood1999, 94:3234–3241.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Giralt S, Estey E, Albitar M, et al.: Engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells with purine analog-containing chemotherapy: harnessing graft-versus-leukemia without myeloablative therapy.Blood1997, 89:4531–4536.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Slavin S, Nagler A, Naparstak E, et al.: Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytoreduction for the treatment of malignant and non-malignant hematologic disease.Blood1998, 91:756–763.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Plunkett W, Sanders P: Metabolism and action of purine nucleoside analogs.Pharmacol Ther1991, 49:239–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Estey E, Plunkett W, Gandhi V, et al.: Fludarabine and arabinosylcytosine therapy of refractory and relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia.Leuk Lymphoma1993, 9:343–350.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kornblau S, Gandhi V, Andreeff M, et al.: Clinical and laboratory studies of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine + cytosine arabinoside for relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia in adults.Leukemia1996, 10:1563–1569.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Przepiorka D, Smith TL, Folloder J, et al.: Risk factors for acute graftversus-host disease after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation.Blood1999, 4:1465–1470.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Giralt S, Cohen A, Mehra R, et al.: Preliminary results of fludarabine/melphalan or 2CDA/melphalan as preparative regimens for allogeneic progenitor cell transplantation in poor candidates for conventional myeloablative conditioning [abstract].Blood1997, 90:417a.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sarosy G, Leyland-Jones B, Soochan P, Cheson BD: The systemic administration of intravenous melphalan.J Clin Oncol1988, 6:17681782.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li L, Keating MJ, Plunket W, Yang LY: Fludarabine-mediated repair inhibition of cisplatin induced DNA lesions in human chronic myelogenous leukemia-blast crisis K562 cells: induction of synergistic cytotoxicity independent of reversal of apoptosis resistance.Modular Pharmacol1997, 52:798–806.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Moreau P, Fiere D, Bezwoda WR, et al.: Prospective randomized placedo-controlled study of granulocyte-macrophage colongystimulating factor without stem-cell transplantation after high-dose melphalan in patients with multiple myeloma.J Clin Oncol1997, 15:660–666.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Besien K, Sobocinski KA, Rowlings PA, et al.: Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for low-grade lymphoma.Blood1998, 92:1832–1836.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Verdonck LF, Dekker AW, Lokhorst HM, et al.: Allogeneic versus autologous bone marrow transplantation for refractory and recurrent low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.Blood1997, 90:4201–4205.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Besien KW, Khouri IF, Giralt SA, et al.: Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for refractory and recurrent low-grade lymphoma: the case for aggressive management.JClin Oncol1995, 13:1096–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Khouri I, Lee M-S, Palmer L, et al.: Transplant-lite using fludarabinecyclophosphamide (FC) and allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) for low-grade lymphoma (LGL).Blood1999, 94 (suppl 1, part I abstr), 348a.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Phillip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, et al.: Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy sensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.N Engl J Med1995, 333:1540–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ratanatharathorn V, Uberti J, Karanes C, et al.: Prospective comparative trial of autologous versus allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.Blood1994, 84:1050–1055.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chopra R, Goldstone AH, Pearce R, et al.: Autologous versus allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A case controlled analysis of the European Bone Marrow Transplant Registry data.JClin Oncol1992, 10:1690–1695.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Khouri I, Giralt S, Saliba R, et al.: “Mini”-allogeneic stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory lymphomas with aggressive histologies.Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2000, 19:47a.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khouri, I., Giralt, S., Champlin, R. (2002). Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation and Induction of Graft-Versus-Malignancy. In: Bashey, A., Ball, E.D. (eds) Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation. Cancer Treatment and Research, vol 110. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0919-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0919-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5304-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-0919-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics