Skip to main content

NGO Accountability in Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Handbook of Civil Society in Africa

Part of the book series: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies ((NCSS,volume 20))

Abstract

Because the accountability movement has largely been driven by donors and governments, the focus has often been on the responsibilities and obligations of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) toward donors and governments. This emphasis appears misplaced given that governments and donors already exert substantial influence over the NGO sector via funding and legislation. In contrast, NGO accountability toward community beneficiaries requires more attention and more advocacy because beneficiaries are often dependent on NGOs that have been contracted by third parties to serve them, but voiceless and powerless in this relationship. As a result, community beneficiaries frequently struggle to hold NGOs accountable. There have been calls for new ways of thinking about accountability and a focus on improving the quality and appropriateness of accountability mechanisms. In African countries especially, there is an additional motivation to rethink existing mechanisms because of concerns about the suitability of many of them to the context and circumstances of the continent. While there is a strong theoretical case for promoting accountability—especially within the African context—there is little evidence to suggest that the dominant models of accountability have been successful in promoting ethical behaviour, transparency, and effectiveness among African NGOs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The organisation AccountAbility finds that a generic approach to accountability is not feasible because what needs to be accounted for will be determined largely by the different cultural and political context. It reports that a “good translation of accountability in other languages is hard to find” (AccountAbility 2007, p. 23). The report finds that in some countries the concept meant better auditing and participation, in others output targets and efficiency measures.

  2. 2.

    Ubuntu is derived from the isiXhosa “Ubuntu ungamntu ngabanye abantu” that means “people are people through other people”.

References

  • AccountAbility. (2007). Development as accountability: Accountability innovators in action. London: AccountAbility.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeh, I. (2004). Fostering accountability in Zimbabwean civil society. The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 6(3). http://www.icnl.org/research/journal/vol6iss3/special_4.htm. Accessed in July, 2012.

  • Aga Khan Development Network. (2007). The third sector in Tanzania—Learning more about civil society organisations, their capabilities and challenges. Tanzania: The John Hopkins University Non-Profit Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agyemang, G., Awumbila, M., Unerman, J., & O’dwyer, B. (2009). NGO accountability and aid delivery what? London: The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants Research Report 110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, B. (2010). Repression of Sudanese civil society under the national Islamic front/national congress party. Review of African Political Economy, 37(126), 437–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K., & Salamon, L. M. (2006). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atibil, C. (2012). Democracy, governance and actors’ conceptualization of “civil society” in Africa: State, civil society relations in Ghana from 1982–2000. Voluntas, 23(1), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, K. (2011). Whose accountability? A case study of NGO accountability to recipients of aid in South Sudan. Cranfield University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. (2005). Donor–NGO relations and representations of livelihood in nongovernmental aid chains. World Development, 33(6), 937–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendell, J. (2006). Debating NGO accountability. UN-NGLS Development Dossier. New York and Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyene, T. (2012). Charity laws and their impacts in democratization: Examining the Ethiopian Charity law. Paper at the International Society for Third Sector Research African workshop, Universita Degli Studi Di Siena, Siena, 9 July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, K. (2010, August). Downward accountability. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, L. (2003). Management standards and development practice in the South African aid chain. Public Administration and Development, 23(5), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, R. (2012). Reconsidering the case for enhancing NGO accountability via regulation, Voluntas, January 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, R., & Owens, T. (2010). Promoting transparency in the NGO sector: Examining the availability and reliability of self-reported data. World Development, 38(9), 1263–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R. A., & Ebrahim, A. (2006). How does accountability affect mission: The case of a nonprofit serving immigrants and refugees. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(2), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claeye, F., & Jackson, T. (2011). The iron cage re-revisited: Institutional isomorphism in non- profit organisations in South Africa. Journal of International Development, 24(5), 602–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., Lucas, H., & Pasteur, K. (2000). Introduction: Accountability through participation: Developing workable partnership models. IDS Bulletin, 31(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droop, J., Isenman, P., & Mlalazi, B. (2008). Paris declaration on aid effectiveness: Study of e xisting mechanisms to promote mutual accountability (Ma) between donors and partner countries at the international level: Final report. London: Oxford Policy Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2002). The cartel of good intentions: The problem of bureaucracy in foreign aid. Policy Reform, 5(4), 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A. (2003a). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A. (2003b). Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A. (2006). Placing the normative logics of accountability in “Thick” perspective. The Hauser Centre for Nonprofit Organizations and the John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Working Paper No. 33.2. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elone, J. (2010). Backlash against democracy: The regulation of civil society in Africa. Washington DC: Democracy and Society. Democrats, Dictators, and Demonstrators Conference Issue. Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guijt, I. (2010). Exploding the Myth of incompatibility between accountability and learning. In J. Ubels, N.-A. Acquaye-Baddoo, & A. Fowler (Eds.), Capacity development in practice (pp. 277–291). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gugerty, M. K. (2007). Models of NGO self-regulation: Theory and evidence from A frica. Washington DC: Evans School Working Paper Number 2007–2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., Rooney, C., & Warren, S. (2010). Addressing accountability in NGO advocacy practice, principles and prospects of self-regulation. London: One World Trust Briefing Paper Number 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariss-Curtis, E. (2002). NGO codes of conduct: And exploration of the current debate. INTRAC Informed, Bulletin 5, pp 2–11. http://www.intrac.org/Intrac/docs/5Informed.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2012.

  • Iheme, E. (2005). Strengthening civil society in Tanzania: A response. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 8(1), 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Centre for Non-profit Law. (2012). NGO law monitor: Rwanda. Washington DC. http://www.icnl.org/research/monitor/rwanda.html. Accessed in July, 2012.

  • Jackson, T. (2011). Conceptualizing the cross-cultural gaps in managing international aid: HIV/AIDS and TB project delivery in Southern Africa. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 26(2), 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T., & Haines, R. (2007). Cross-cultural management in South African NGOs. South African Review of Sociology, 38(1), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, L. (2005). Mechanism for Accountability. GPPI Research Paper Series no. 3. Cambridge, Mass: Global Public Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawry, R. P. (1995). Accountability and non-profit organizations: An ethical perspective. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, R., & de las Casas, L. (2006). NGO self-regulation: Enforcing and balancing accountability. London: One World Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, J. (2008). Pushback against NGOs in Egypt. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 10(4), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milofskry, C., & Blades, S. D. (1991). Issues of accountability in health charities: A case study of problems among nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(4), 371–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, G. (2002). The disappointments of civil society: The politics of NGO intervention in northern Ghana. Political Geography, 21(1), 125–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, B. (2009). The legislative environment for civil society in Africa: A synthesis report, trust Africa. http://www.trustafrica.org/documents/LegislativeEnvironment.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2012.

  • Murphy, J. (2011). The dark side. ed. rupert taylor. Third sector research. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtaza, N. (2011). Putting the lasts first: The case for community- focused and peer-managed NGO accountability mechanisms. Voluntas, 23(1), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musembi, F., & Kilalo, C. (2000, January). Between communities and health facilities in health service delivery: Reality or myth. IDS Bulletin, 31(1), 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najam, A. (1996). NGO accountability: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 14(4), 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NED and ICNL. (2008). Defending civil society. Available at www.wmd.org/documents/Defending%20Civil%20Society%20-%20English.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec. 2011.

  • Olarinmoye, O. (2011). Accountability of faith based organisations in Nigeria: Preliminary Explorations. Global Economic Governance Programme working paper 2011/67 Centre for International Studies—Oxford University Department for Politics and International Relations. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshewolo, S. (2011). Limited policy engagement of non-governmental organizations: A guilt trip on the Nigerian state. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 13(1), 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauh, K. (2010). NGOs, foreign donors, and organizational processes: Passive NGO recipients or strategic actors? McGill Sociological Review, 1, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SM, Jones III JP, Fröhling O. (2005). NGOs and the globalization of managerialism: A research framework. World Development, 33(11), 1845–1864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routley, L. (2011). NGO and the formation of the public: Grey practices and accountability. African Affairs, 111(442), 116–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saki, O. (2010). Sub-Saharan Africa country reports: Zimbabwe. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 12(2), 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, H., & Mitchell G. (2009). Bracing for impact: A fresh look at how to best measure NGO efficiency and effectiveness. Monday Developments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slim, H. (2002). By What Authority? The Legitimacy and Accountability of Non-Governmental Organisations. The International Council on Human Rights Policy International Meeting on Global Trends and Human Rights—Before and After September 11 Geneva, January 10–12, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, T., Borstein, L., & Chapman, J. (2007). The aid chain. South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werker, E., Ahmed, F. (2008). What do NGOs do? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. W. (2012). NGOs and western hegemony: Causes for concern and ideas for change. Development in Practice, 22(1), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronelle Burger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burger, R., Seabe, D. (2014). NGO Accountability in Africa. In: Obadare, E. (eds) The Handbook of Civil Society in Africa. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies, vol 20. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8262-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics