Abstract
This chapter investigates the challenges and needs that should be addressed in teacher preparation for educational technology. It presents a study which analyzed 30 preservice elementary school teachers’ lesson plans, representing their first attempts to design a web-based lesson. The analysis focused on the types of activities they had designed, the characteristics of the web resources they had selected, and the scaffolding techniques they had planed to use to support their students. Most preservice teachers designed either open-research or over-structured student activities that focused on information retrieval. Overall, they demonstrated a limited repertoire of techniques to scaffold elementary students with web learning beyond the level of information search and factual information extraction. Also, many students did not utilize the full range of online information resources and selected inappropriate websites. Study findings highlight that, in order to use the Internet productively and creatively, teachers need to develop complex forms of knowledge that require the integration of knowledge about technology, pedagogy, and content.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-PCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge. Computers and Education, 52(1), 154–168.
Benson, S. N. K., & Ward, C. L. (2013). Teaching with technology: Using TPACK to understand teaching expertise in online higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 153–172.
Borko, H., Stecher, B., & Kuffner, K. (2007). Using artifacts to characterize reform-oriented instruction: The scoop notebook and rating guide (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 707). Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). Accessed November 12, 2010, from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R707.pdf
Childs, A., Twidle, J., Sorensen, P., & Godwin, J. (2007). Trainee teachers’ use of the Internet—opportunities and challenges for initial teacher education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 25(1), 77–97.
Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257.
Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 95–123.
Hartley, J. (2004). Designing instructional and informational text. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 917–945). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11, 149–173.
Julien, H., & Barker, S. (2009). How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library & Information Science Research, 31(1), 12–17.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Kupier, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The web as an information resource in K-12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 285–328.
Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1–21.
Li, D. D., & Lim, C. P. (2008). Scaffolding online historical inquiry tasks: A case study of two secondary school classrooms. Computers and Education, 50, 1394–1410.
Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R. W. (2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student teacher/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427–462.
Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H., Pascal, J., & Valdés, R. (2002). Measuring instructional quality in accountability systems: Classroom assignments and student achievement. Educational Assessment, 8, 207–229.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McTigue, E. M. (2009). Does multimedia learning theory extend to middle-school students? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 143–153.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984–2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326.
Mouza, C., & Karchmer-Klein, R. (2013). Promoting and assessing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in the context of case development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 127–152.
OECD. (2011). PISA 2009 results: Students on line: Digital technologies and performance (Volume VI). Accessed December 18, 2012, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112995-en
Osborne, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions. Bristol: Futurelab. Accessed September 24, 2011, from http://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/FUTL74
Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Goldstein, J. (2007). Comparing classroom enactments of an inquiry curriculum: Lessons learned from two teachers. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 81–130.
Quintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. (2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 235–244.
Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schofield, J. W. (2006). Internet use in schools: Promise and problems. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 521–534). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Learning in a sheltered Internet environment: The use of WebQuests. Learning and Instruction, 19, 423–432.
Silver, E. A., Mesa, V. M., Morris, K. A., Star, J. R., & Benken, B. M. (2009). Teaching mathematics for understanding: An analysis of lessons submitted by teachers seeking NBPTS certification. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 501–531.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 22, 271–296.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge—a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 109–121.
Wallace, R. M. (2004). A framework for understanding teaching with the internet. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 447–488.
Wallace, R. M., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students on-line in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75–104.
Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers in Education, 25, 234–246.
Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 235–286.
Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graeser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1016–1106.
Zhang, M., & Quintana, C. (2012). Scaffolding strategies for supporting middle school students’ online inquiry processes. Computers and Education, 58, 181–196.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vekiri, I. (2014). Teacher Preparation for Educational Technology. In: Karagiannidis, C., Politis, P., Karasavvidis, I. (eds) Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6501-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6501-0_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6500-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6501-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)