Skip to main content

Abstract

Classifying wetlands is useful for describing and managing their natural variability. The hydrogeomorphic (HGM) approach, which covers classification, reference, and functional assessment aspects, has proven to be helpful in classifying wetlands as to their position in the landscape, their source of water, and the flow of that water. In this chapter, we review the origins and characteristics of freshwater wetlands for ecoregions of the Mid-Atlantic region (MAR), which are dominated by riverine types. Inventories of wetlands in the MAR are dated, so we discuss what is known with regard to status and trends, and potential solutions. We discuss the value of establishing a reference set to assist with classification, assessment, and mitigation of wetlands, and describe the set of reference wetlands compiled for Pennsylvania by Riparia. Preliminary results from a regional condition assessment of wetlands in the MAR are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barendregt A, Whigham DF, Baldwin AH (eds) (2009) Tidal freshwater wetlands. Bachkhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford B (1996) The need to define hydrologic equivalence at the landscape scale for freshwater mitigation. Ecol Appl 6:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM (1993) A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Technical report WRP-DE-4, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Washington, DC, 79pp+app

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RP, Cole CA, Wardrop DH, Bishel-Machung L, Prosser DJ, Campbell DA, Gaudette MT (1996) Wetlands, wildlife, and watershed assessment techniques for evaluation and restoration (W3ATER), vol 1, 2A, and 2B. Report No. 96-2, Penn State Cooperative Wetlands Center, University Park, PA, 782pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RP, Wardrop DH, Cole CA, Reisinger KR (2002) Using reference wetlands for integrating wetland inventory, assessment, and restoration for watersheds. In: Tiner RW (compiler) Watershed-based wetland planning and evaluation. A collection of papers from the Wetland Millennium Event, 6–12 Aug 2000, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. Distrib. by Association of State Wetland Managers, Inc., Berne, NY, 141pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RP, Wardrop DH, Cole CA, Rubbo JM, Bishop JA (2004) Reference wetlands and hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification. Part II. A. In: Brooks RP (ed) Monitoring and assessing Pennsylvania wetlands. Final report for cooperative agreement No. X-827157-01, between Penn State Cooperative Wetlands Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RP (ed) (2004) Monitoring and assessing Pennsylvania wetlands. Final report for cooperative agreement No. X-827157-01, between Penn State Cooperative Wetlands Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RP, Brinson MM, Havens KJ, Hershner CS, Rheinhardt RD, Wardrop DH, Whigham DF, Jacobs AD, Rubbo JM (2011) Proposed hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands of the mid-Atlantic region, USA. Wetlands 31(2):207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RP, Tyrna A (2012) Assessing the precious gems of the wetland conservation crown. National Wetlands Newsletter May–Jun: 6–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RP, Wardrop DH, Cole CA (2006) Inventorying and monitoring wetland condition and restoration potential on a watershed basis with examples from the Spring Creek watershed, Pennsylvania, USA. Environ Manage 38:673–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun AJK, deMaynadier PG (eds) (2007) Science and conservation of vernal pools in Northeastern North America. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole CA, Brooks RP, Wardrop DH (1997) Wetland hydrology as a function of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) subclass. Wetlands 17(4):456–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, 131pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (1990) Wetlands: losses in the United States, 1780’s to 1980’s. FWS/OBS-79/31, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (2006) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998 to 2004. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, 112pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (2011) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 2004 to 2009. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, 108pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Geographic Data Center (2009) Wetlands mapping standard. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FGDC Document Number: FGDC-STD-015-2009, July 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz K (2005) Predicting groundwater discharge from landscape data in riparian corridors in central Pennsylvania. Honors thesis in geography and environmental resources management. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 60pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes RM, Larsen DP, Omernik JM (1986) Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potentials. Environ Manage 10(5):629–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR, Chu EW (1999) Restoring life in running waters. Better biological monitoring. Island Press, Washington, DC, 149pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentula ME, Brooks RP, Gwin SE, Holland CC, Sherman AD, Sifneos JC (1992) Wetlands. An approach to improving decision making in wetland restoration and creation. Island Press, Washington, DC, 151pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxa M, Bolstad P (2009) Mapping Northern wetlands with high resolution satellite images and LiDAR. Wetlands 29(1):248–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin K (1999) Probability of wetland occurrence characterized by geology, slope, and stream link number: Spring Creek, White Deer Creek, and Juniata Watersheds, Pennsylvania. Senior thesis, Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 68pp+app.&plates

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NJ, 582pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Decamps H, McClain ME (2005) Riparia: ecology, conservation, and management of streamside communities. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, 430pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (2011) Section 309 assessment and strategy of Pennsylvania’s coastal resources management program. PADEP, Coastal Resources Management Program, Harrisburg, PA, 134pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Perillo GME, Wolanski E, Cahoon DR, Brinson MM (2009) Coastal wetlands: an integrated ecosystem approach. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 941pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatick ER (2003) Our “folded” Appalachians. Pennsylvania Game News 74(7):23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RD, Ammann A, Bartoldus C, Brinson MM (1995) An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. Wetlands research program technical report WRP-DE-9. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Washington, DC, 79pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein ED, Mattson M, Fetscher AE, Halama KJ (2004) Influence of geologic setting on slope wetland hydrodynamics. Wetlands 24:244–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens DL Jr, Olsen AR (2004) Spatially balanced sampling of natural resources. J Am Stat Assoc 99(465):262–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner RW (1987) Mid-Atlantic wetlands: A disappearing natural treasure. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services, Northeast Region, Hadley, MA, USA. Regional Wetlands Status and Trend Reports, 181pp

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Forest Service (2010) http://www.fs.fed.us/land/pubs/ecoregions/ch21.html. Accessed 26 March 2010

  • Ward JV, Tockner K, Arscott DB, Claret C (2002) Riverine landscape diversity. Freshwater Biol 47:517–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop DH, Kentula ME, Stevens DL Jr, Jensen SF, Brooks RP (2007) Assessment of wetland condition: an example from the Upper Juniata Watershed in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 27(3):416–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert P. Brooks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brooks, R.P., Brinson, M.M., Wardrop, D.H., Bishop, J.A. (2013). Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) Classification, Inventory, and Reference Wetlands. In: Brooks, R., Wardrop, D. (eds) Mid-Atlantic Freshwater Wetlands: Advances in Wetlands Science, Management, Policy, and Practice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5596-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics