A Framework for Thinking About Developing a Global Community

Chapter
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)

Abstract

This chapter consists of two main parts. The first part is concerned with presenting social psychological knowledge about groups: What are groups? How do groups form? How do they develop and function? How do people identify with the groups to which they belong? In the second part, the information presented in the first is employed to suggest how a global community could be developed: How can personal identification with a global community be fostered? How do we facilitate change to create a functioning global community? The chapter presents a framework for thinking about these issues rather than offering fully detailed suggestions.

Keywords

Methane Dioxide Income Marketing Gasoline 

References

  1. Abrams, D., Frinds, D., & Randsley de Moura, G. (2005). Group identity and self-definition. In S. Wheelan (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice (pp. 329–350). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderfer, C. P., & Smith, K. K. (1982). Studying intergroup relations embedded in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 35–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alinsky, S. D. (1971). Rules for radicals: A practical primer for realistic radicals. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  4. Bachstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Lan, X. (2006). Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2006. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bartlett, R. V. (1986, Fall). Ecological rationality: Reason and environmental policy. Environmental Ethics, 8(3), 227.Google Scholar
  6. Bornstein, D. (2007). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brazaitis, S. J. (2004). White women – Protectors of the status quo, positioned to disrupt it. In S. Cytrynbaum & D. Noumair (Eds.), Group relations reader 3 (pp. 99–116). Washington, DC: A.K. Rice Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Buchan, N. R., Brewer, M. B., Grimalda, G., Wilson, R. K., Fatas, E., & Foddy, M. (2011). Global social identity and global cooperation. Psychological Research, X, 1–8. doi:  10.1177/0956797611409590.Google Scholar
  9. Bunker, B. B., & Alban, B. T. (Eds.). (2005). Large group interventions. [Special issue]. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(1).Google Scholar
  10. Deutsch, M. (1994). Constructive conflict management for the world today. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deutsch, M. (2006). A framework for thinking about oppression and its change. Social Justice Research, 19, 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diesing, P. (1962). Reason in society: Five types of decisions and their social conditions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dietz-Uhler, B., & Murell, A. (1998). Effects of social identity and threat on self-esteem and group attributions. Group Dynamics, 2, 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative experience. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
  15. Forsyth, D. (2009). Group dynamics (5th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  16. Gaucher, D., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Difficulties awakening the sense of injustice and overcoming oppression: On the soporific effects of system justification. In P. Coleman (Ed.), Conflict, interdependence and justice: The intellectual legacy of Morton Deutsch. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Grant, P. R. (1993). Ethnocentrism in response to a threat to social identity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 143–154.Google Scholar
  18. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 16, 1243–1248.Google Scholar
  19. Lent, R. M., McCormick, M. T., & Pearce, D. S. (2005). Combining future search and open space to address special situations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(1), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levi, D. (2011). Group dynamics for teams (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Lukensmeyer, C. J., & Brigham, S. (2005). Taking democracy to scale: Large scale intervention – For citizens. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marsella, A. J. (1998). Toward a global-community psychology: Meeting the needs of a changing world. American Psychologist, 53(12), 1282–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCall, G. J. (1970). The social organization of relationships. In G. J. McCall, M. M. McCall, N. K. Denzin, G. D. Suttles, & S. B. Kurth (Eds.), Social relationships (pp. 3–34). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  25. McRae, M. B., & Short, E. L. (2010). Racial and cultural dynamics in group and organizational life: Crossing boundaries. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind self & society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mischel, W., DeSmet, A. L., & Kross, E. (2006). Self-regulation in the service of conflict resolution. In M. Deutsch, P. Coleman, & E. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge: Harvard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ramsey, V. J., & Latting, J. K. (2005). A typology of intergroup competencies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(3), 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roosevelt, F. D. (1941). Address to Congress on January 6, 1941 on The four freedoms Google Scholar
  32. Sharp, G. (1971). The politics of nonviolent action: An encyclopedia of thought and action. Philadelphia: Pilgrim Press.Google Scholar
  33. Stern, N. (2006). Stern review on the economics of climate change. London: Her Majesty’s Treasury.Google Scholar
  34. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. (2010). MisMeasuring our lives: Why the GDP doesn’t add up. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  35. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tan, S., & Brown, J. (2005). The world café in Singapore: Creating a learning culture through dialogue. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(1), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. The declaration on the rights and responsibilities of individuals, groups, and organs of society to promote and protect universally recognized human rights and freedoms (Adopted by the General Assembly of the UN, December, 1998).Google Scholar
  38. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages in small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Washington, DC: World Service Authority.Google Scholar
  42. Wells, L. (1995). The group as a whole: A systematic socioanalytic perspective on interpersonal and group relations. In J. Gillette & M. McCollom (Eds.), Groups in context: A new perspective on group dynamics. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  43. Westaby, J. D. (2012). Dynamic network theory: How social networks influence goal pursuit. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wheelan, S. (2004). Group processes: A developmental perspective (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  45. Wheelan, S. (2005). The developmental perspective. In S. Wheelan (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice (pp. 119–132). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morton Deutsch
    • 1
  • Eric C. Marcus
    • 1
  • Sarah Brazaitis
    • 2
  1. 1.International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution, Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Organization and Leadership, Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations