Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Functional Anatomy and Imaging of the Spine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comprehensive Treatment of Chronic Pain by Medical, Interventional, and Integrative Approaches

  • 4593 Accesses

Abstract

Painful disorders of the spine are among our most common medical complaints. Over a lifetime, 60–80 % of adults experience at least one significant episode of back pain. In a single year, 15–20 % will have back pain, and 2–5 % of the entire population will seek medical attention for back pain. Low back pain has been estimated as the fifth leading cause of all medical visits and the second leading cause of symptom-related medical visits. In the United States, the estimated annual cost of back pain is $20 billion to $50 billion. In particular, low back pain is one of the most important factors in medical costs and disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Borenstein D. Epidemiology, etiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of low back pain. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001;13(2):128–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rubin D. Epidemiology and risk factors for spine pain. Neurol Clin. 2007;25(2):353–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hart L, Deyo R, Cherkin D. Physician office visits for low back pain: frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment pattern from a US national survey. Spine. 1995;20(1):11–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pai S, Sundaram L. Low back pain: an economic assessment in the United States. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boden S, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg. 1990;72(3):403–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin B, et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008;299(6):656–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis P, et al. Expert panel on neurologic imaging. ACR appropriateness criteria low back pain. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daffner R, et al. Expert panel on musculoskeletal imaging. ACR appropriateness criteria chronic neck pain. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Naderi S, Andalkar N, Benzel E. History of spine biomechanics: part I–the pre-Greco-Roman, Greco-Roman, and medieval roots of spine biomechanics. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(2):382–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marketos S, Skiadas P. Galen: a pioneer of spine research. Spine. 1999;24(22):2358.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanan A, Rengachary S. The history of spinal biomechanics. Neurosurgery. 1996;39(4):657–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Benini A, Bonar S. Andreas vesalius: 1514-1564. Spine. 1996;21(11):1388–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Naderi S, et al. Functional anatomy of the spine by Avicenna in his eleventh century treatise Al-Qanun fi al-Tibb (the canons of medicine). Neurosurgery. 2003;52(6):1449–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Naderi S, Andalkar N, Benzel E. History of spine biomechanics: part II–from the renaissance to the 20th century. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(2):392–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spiegel P. The first clinical x ray made in America. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:241–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hesselink J. Spine imaging: history, achievements. Remaining frontiers. AJR. 1988;150:1223–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bogduk N. Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Backonja M. Defining neuropathic pain. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(3):785–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mekhail N, et al. Clinical applications of neurostimulation: forty years later. Pain Pract. 2010;10(2):103–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wyke B. The neurological basis of thoracic spinal pain. Rheumatol Phys Med. 1970;10:356–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Simons D, Travell J, Simons L. Travell & Simons’ myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual, vol. 2. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Slipman C, et al. Symptom provocation of fluoroscopically guided cervical nerve root stimulation. Are dynatomal maps identical to dermatomal maps? Spine. 1998;23(20):2235–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Slipman C, et al. Clinical evidence of chemical radiculopathy. Pain Physician. 2002;5(3):260–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huston C, Slipman C. Diagnostic selective nerve root blocks: indications and usefulness. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2002;13:545–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mathis J, editor. Image-guided spine interventions. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Magee D. Orthopedic physical assessment. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  28. White A, Panjabi M. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Maigne R, Liberson W. Orthopedic medicine: a new approach to vertebral manipulations. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Junghanns H. Der lumbosacralwinkel. Dtsch Z Chir. 1929;213:332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Oliver J, Middleditch A. Functional anatomy of the spine. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinmann Ltd; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schneck C. Functional and clinical anatomy of the spine. SPINE. 1995;9(3):525–58.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mathis J, Deramond H, Belkoff S, editors. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gilad I, Nisan M. Sagittal evaluation of elemental geometrical dimensions of human vertebrae. J Anat. 1985;143:115.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Schmorl G, Junghanns H. The human spine in health and disease. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Twomey L, Taylor J. Physical therapy of the low back. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Davis P. Human lower lumbar vertebrae: some mechanical and osteological considerations. J Anat. 1961;95:337–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hellems H, Keates T. Measurement of the normal lumbosacral angle. Am J Roentgenol. 1971;113:642.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bogduk N. The menisci of the lumbar zygapophyseal joints: a review of their anatomy and clinical significance. Spine. 1984;9(5):454–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Goldwaithe J. The lumbo-sacral articulation: an explanation of any cases of lumbago, sciatica and paraplegia. Boston Med Surg J. 1911;164:365–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mooney V, Robertson J. The facet syndrome. Clin Orthop. 1976;115:149–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang K, King A. Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypothesis for low-back pain. Spine. 1984;9(6):557–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Foley B, Buschbacher R. Sacroiliac joint pain: anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85:997–1006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mixter W, Barr J. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med. 1934;211:210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Grignon B, Roland J. Can the human intervertebral disc be compared to a diarthrodial joint? Surg Radiol Anat. 2000;22(2):101–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mow V, Huiskes R. Basic orthpaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fardon D, Milette P. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine. 2001;26(5):E93–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Benneker L, et al. 2004 Young investigator award winner: vertebral endplate marrow contact channel occlusions and intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine. 2005;30(2):167–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Roofe P. Innervation of anulus fibrosus and posterior longitudinal ligament. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1940;44:100–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Malinský J. The ontogenetic development of nerve terminations in the intervertebral discs of man. (Histology of intervertebral discs, 11th communication). Acta Anat. 1959;38:96–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rabischong P, et al. The intervertebral disc. Anat Clin. 1978;1:55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yoshizawa H, et al. The neuropathology of intervertebral discs removed for low back pain. J Pathol. 1980;132:95–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Bogduk N. The lumbar mamillo-accessory ligament: its anatomical and neurosurgical significance. Spine. 1981;6(2):162–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Palmgren T, et al. An immunohistochemical study of nerve structures in the annulus fibrosus of human normal lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine. 1999;24:2075–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ashton I, Roberts S, Jaffray D. Neuropeptides in the human intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res. 1994;12:186–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Slipman C, et al. Interventional spine: an algorithmic approach. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bogduk N, Tynan W, Wilson A. The nerve supply to the human lumbar intervertebral discs. J Anat. 1981;132:39–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ledsome J, et al. Diurnal changes in lumbar intervertebral distance, measured using ultrasound. Spine. 1996;21(14):1671–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Nachemson A, Moriss J. In vivo measurements of intradiscal pressure: discometry, a method for the determination of pressure in the lower lumbar discs. J Bone Joint Surg. 1964;46:1077–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Lirk P, et al. Cervical and high thoracic ligamentum flavum frequently fails to fuse in the midline. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(6):1387–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Adams M, Hutton W, Stott J. The resistance to flexion of the lumbar intervertebral joint. Spine. 1980;5(3):245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Leong J, et al. The biomechanical functions of the iliolumbar ligament in maintaining stability of the lumbosacral junction. Spine. 1987;12:669–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Windsor R, Falco F. Clinical orientation to spinal anatomy. Atlanta: O2 Communications; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Cailliett R. Low back pain syndrome. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bogduk N, MacIntosh J. The applied anatomy of the thoracolumbar fascia. Spine. 1984;9(2):164–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Lee C, Rauschning W, Glenn W. Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression. Spine. 1988;13(3):313–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Bogduk N, editor. Practice guidelines: spinal diagnostic and treatment procedures. San Francisco: International Spine Intervention Society; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Baker R, et al. Cervical transforaminal injection of corticosteroids into a radicular artery: a possible mechanism for spinal cord injury. Pain. 2003;103(1–2):211–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Scanlon G, et al. Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections: more dangerous than we think? Spine. 2007;32(11):1249–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Huntoon M. Anatomy of the cervical intervertebral foramina: vulnerable arteries and ischemic neurologic injuries after transforaminal epidural injections. Pain. 2005;117(1–2):104–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Rathmell J. Atlas of image-guided intervention in regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Philadelphia: Lipincott; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Murthy N, Maus T, Behrns C. Intraforaminal location of the great anterior radiculomedullary artery (artery of adamkiewicz): a retrospective review. Pain Med. 2010;11:1756–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Houten J, Errico T. Paraplegia after lumbosacral nerve root block: report of three cases. Spine J. 2002;2(1):70–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kaplan M, Cooke J, Collins J. Intravascular uptake during fluoroscopically guided cervical interlaminar steroid injection at C6-7: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(6):1206.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Melzack R, Wall P. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150:971–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Meyerson B, Linderoth B. Mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain. Neurol Res. 2000;22(3):285–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Prager J. What does the mechanism of spinal cord stimulation tell Us about complex regional pain syndrome? Pain Med. 2010;8(11):1278–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Yang S, et al. Identifying pathogens of spondylodiscitis: percutaneous endoscopy or CT-guided biopsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:3086–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Jarvik J, Deyo R. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:586–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. A.C.o.D.a.C. Media, editor. ACR manual on contrast media, Version 7 edn. American College of Radiology; 2010, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zukotynski K, et al. The value of SPECT in the detection of stress injury to the pars interarticularis in patients with low back pain. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Carragee E, et al. 2009 ISSLS prize winner: does discography cause accelerated progression of degeneration changes in the lumbar disc: a ten-year matched cohort study. Spine. 2009;34(21):2338–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Washington D.C.: National Osteoporosis Foundation; 2010. Available at: http://www.nof.org/professionals/clinical-guidelines.

  84. Smith J, Finnoff J. Diagnostic and interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound: part 1. Fundamentals. PMR. 2009;1(1):64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Smith J, Finnoff J. Diagnostic and interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound: part 2. Clinical applications. PMR. 2009;1(2):162–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Ultrasound: not effective in diagnosing spinal injuries. ACR Bull, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Nazarian L, et al. Paraspinal ultrasonography: lack of accuracy in evaluating patients with cervical or lumbar back pain. J Ultrasound Med. 1998;17:117–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Greher M, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar facet nerve block. A sonoanatomic study of a new methodologic approach. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1242–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Greher M, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar facet nerve block. Accuracy of a new technique confirmed by computed tomography. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:1195–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Shim J, et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar medial branch block: a clinical study with fluoroscopy control. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31(5):451–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Eichenberger U, et al. Sonographic visualization and ultrasound-guided block of the third occipital nerve. Prospective for a new method to diagnose C2–C3 zygapophysial joint pain. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:303–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kim S, et al. Sonographic estimation of needle depth for cervical epidural blocks. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(5):1542–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Vesalius A. On the fabric of the human body. A translation of De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem. San Francisco: Norman Publishing; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Rothstein J, Serge H, et al. The rehabilitation specialist’s handbook. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  95. White A, Panjabi M. The basic kinematics of the human spine. A review of past and current knowledge. Spine. 1978;3(1):12–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spine Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    John C. Keel M.D.

  2. Department of Orthopedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    John C. Keel M.D.

  3. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA

    Gary J. Brenner M.D., Ph.D.

  4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Gary J. Brenner M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. John C. Keel M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gary J. Brenner M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John C. Keel M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The Center for Pain Relief, Inc., West Virginia University, 400 Court Street, Suite 100, Charleston, 25301, West Virginia, USA

    Timothy R. Deer

  2. Stanford Pain Management Center, Redwood City, CA, Clinic Chief, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, 94065, California, USA

    Michael S. Leong

  3. Department of Anesthesiology, Rush Medical College, Professor, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, 60612, Illinois, USA

    Asokumar Buvanendran

  4. Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, 17033-0850, Pennsylvania, USA

    Vitaly Gordin

  5. Center for Interventional Pain and Spine, Newark, DE USA, Medical Director, Bryn Mawr Hospital, Bryn Mawr, 19010, Pennsylvania, USA

    Philip S. Kim

  6. President, National Institute of Pain, Tampa, 33558, Florida, USA

    Sunil J. Panchal

  7. The LITE Center, Clinical Associate Professor, Medical Director, School of Medicine, Miami, 33143, Florida, USA

    Albert L. Ray

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 American Academy of Pain Medicine

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keel, J.C., Brenner, G.J. (2013). Functional Anatomy and Imaging of the Spine. In: Deer, T., et al. Comprehensive Treatment of Chronic Pain by Medical, Interventional, and Integrative Approaches. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1560-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1560-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-1559-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-1560-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation