Skip to main content

Economics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Paradigms in Theory Construction
  • 2892 Accesses

Abstract

I am not an economist in any way, shape, or form. This is why I could not muster enough influence or traction to recruit or seduce a real, qualified, honest-to-goodness economist to collaborate with one chapter in this volume. However, I felt that this volume would not be complete without a chapter in this discipline. Consequently, I had to make do, in complete humility and admitted ignorance, with the help of Karen Viars, with whatever I could find by cross-indexing paradigms with economics. Then I tried to make sense of whatever information I gathered through summaries that I reproduced here with complete bibliographic acknowledgments. Whether all these summaries should be within quotes because they are essentially downloaded with few cosmetic changes is a decision that I made after discussing with two colleagues who are versed in the ethics of citing published research. The reader should understand that perhaps the whole chapter should be within quotes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnould, E. J. (1989). Toward a broadened theory of preference formation and the diffusion of innovations: Cases from Zinder Province, Niger Republic. The Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 239–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolacchi, G. (2008). A new paradigm for the integration of the social sciences. In N. K. Innis & N. K. Innis (Eds.), Reflections on adaptive behavior: Essays in honor of J. E. R. Staddon (pp. 315–353). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W., & Coon, G. S. (1993). Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. The Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 393–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, W. K., Hughes, J. R., DeGrandpre, R. J., & Higgins, S. T. (1992). Behavioral economics of drug self-administration: IV. The effects of response requirement on the consumption of and interaction between concurrently available coffee and cigarettes. Psychopharmacology, 107, 211–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2006). How to explain prosocial and solidarity behavior: A comparison of framing theory with related meta-theoretical paradigms. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, S. Lindenberg, D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological (pp. 225–242). New York, NY: Springer Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, C., & Paul, D. (2003). Life and work: Challenging economic man. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, L., & Kramer, T. (2009). The effect of superstitious beliefs on performance expectations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, S., & Thomas, K. (2007). Valuation of intellectual capital in knowledge-based firms: The need for new methods in a changing economic paradigm. Management Decision, 45, 1484–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. (1991). Consumption: The new wave of research in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Peng, M. W., & Saparito, P. A. (2002). Individualism, collectivism, and opportunism: A cultural perspective on transaction cost economics. Journal of Management, 28, 567–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conceição, P., & Heitor, M. V. (2003). Systems of innovation and competence building across diversity: Learning from the Portuguese path in the European context. In L. V. Shavinina & L. V. Shavinina (Eds.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 945–975). New York: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • David, P., & Vicarelli, G. (1989). Social and economic aspects of the family in an Italian peripheral area. Marriage & Family Review, 14, 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza, R. (2009). Creating “communicative spaces”: A case of NGO community organizing for HIV/AIDS prevention. Health Communication, 24, 692–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derné, S. (1994). Structural realities, persistent dilemmas, and the construction of emotional paradigms: Love in three cultures. In W. M. Wentworth, J. Ryan, W. M. Wentworth, & J. Ryan (Eds.), Social perspectives on emotion (Vol. 2, pp. 281–308). New York: Elsevier Science/JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. H., Salvy, S. J., Carr, K. A., Dearing, K. K., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Food reinforcement, delay discounting and obesity. Physiology and Behavior, 100, 438–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1986). Socio-economics: A proposal for a new interdisciplinary field. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetchenhauer, D., & Dunning, D. (2009). Do people trust too much or too little? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetchenhauer, D., Flashe, A., Buunk, A. P., & Lindenberg, S. (Eds.). (2006). Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives. New York: Springer-Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. (1997). Individuals, communities and organizations: A communitarian paradigm for cross-cultural enterprise. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A, 57, 4532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (Eds.). (2007). Economics and psychology: A promising new cross-disciplinary field. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M. (2008). Review of ‘Economics and psychology: A promising new cross-disciplinary field’. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 343–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassenheimer, J. B., Houston, F. S., & Davis, J. (1998). The role of economic value, social value, and perceptions of fairness in interorganizational relationship retention decisions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 322–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glimcher, P. W. (2003). Decisions, uncertainty, and the brain: The science of neuroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard, J. (2002). Institutional environments, employer practices, and states in liberal market economies. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 41, 249–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2010). Experimental and correlational analyses of delay and probability discounting. In G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 67–92). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1994). From marketing mix to relationship marketing: Towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decision, 32, 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinote, A., & Vescio, T. K. (Eds.). (2010). The social psychology of power. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, T. A., O’Doherty, J., Camerer, C. F., Schultz, W., & Range, A. (2008). Dissociating the role of the orbitofrontal cortex and the striatum in the computation of goal values and prediction errors. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(22), 5623–5630.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hesterly, W. S., Liebeskind, J., & Zenger, T. R. (1990). Organizational economics: An impending revolution in organization theory? The Academy of Management Review, 15, 402–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, C. R., Peters, C., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Gift giving: A community paradigm. Psychology and Marketing, 23, 573–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, S. (2004). Disability studies and health care curriculum: The great divide. Journal of Allied Health, 33, 184–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kayaalp, O. (1989). Reconciling economic postulates: Does ‘adaptive’ egoism satisfice? Journal of Behavioral Economics, 18, 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W. E. (2006). The role of the dominant social paradigm in the quality of life/environmental interface. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W. E., Beckmann, S. C., Lewis, A., & Van Dam, Y. (2001). A multinational examination of the role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes of university students. Environment and Behavior, 33, 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’Abate, L. (2011a). Hurt feelings: Theory and research in intimate relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Abate, L. (2011b). The seven sources of pleasure: Making way for the upside in the midst of modern demands. Newport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Abate, L., Cusinato, M., Maino, E., Colesso, W., & Scilletta, C. (2010). Relational competence theory: Research and mental health applications. New York: Springer-Science.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lamal, P. A. (1992). Behavior analysis and socio-economics: Some similarities and differences. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 21, 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindbladh, E., & Lyttkens, C. (2002). Habit versus choice: The process of decision-making in health-related behaviour. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S. (2006). Prosocial behavior, solidarity, and framing processes. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, S. Lindenberg, D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 23–44). New York, NY: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, C. (1988). Unnatural emotions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (Eds.). (2010). Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Smart, D. L. (1993). Efficiency v. structure-conduct-performance: Implications for strategy research and practice. Journal of Management, 19, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, L. A. (2004). Review of ‘Life and work: Challenging economic man’. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 228–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nida-Rümelin, J. (1991). Practical reason or metapreferences? An undogmatic defense of Kantian morality. Theory and Decision, 30, 133–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, A., & Rydval, O. (2004). Review of ‘Decisions, uncertainty, and the brain. The science of neuroeconomics’. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 891–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirages, D. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1974). Ark II: Social response to environmental imperatives. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafferty, J. (2001). The synthesis of economic organization and the management of change: Intercultural transferability and the Japanese paradigm. Management Decision, 39, 415–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savani, K., Markus, H., & Conner, A. L. (2008). Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 861–876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O. (1991). Socio-economics: Challenge to the neoclassical economic paradigm. Psychological Science, 2, 12–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaddock, A. J. (2003). People with disabilities in the era of the ‘triple bottom line’. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 28, 90–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. P. (2005). Agency theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storberg-Walker, J. (2009). Heterodox economics, social capital, and HRD: Moving beyond the limits of the neoclassical paradigm. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 97–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermann, D. (1995). Human capital theory and the individualization theorem. In G. Neubauer & K. Hurrelmann (Eds.), Individualization in childhood and adolescence (pp. 223–245). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Ende, J., & Dolfsma, W. (2005). Technology-push, demand-pull and the shaping of technological paradigms – Patterns in the development of computing technology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15, 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendlandt, M., & Schrader, U. (2007). Consumer reactance against loyalty programs. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24, 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafirovski, M. (1998). Socio-economics and rational choice theory: Specification of their relations. The Journal of SocioEconomics, 27, 165–205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano L’Abate .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

L’Abate, L. (2012). Economics. In: L'Abate, L. (eds) Paradigms in Theory Construction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0914-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics