Abstract
I am not an economist in any way, shape, or form. This is why I could not muster enough influence or traction to recruit or seduce a real, qualified, honest-to-goodness economist to collaborate with one chapter in this volume. However, I felt that this volume would not be complete without a chapter in this discipline. Consequently, I had to make do, in complete humility and admitted ignorance, with the help of Karen Viars, with whatever I could find by cross-indexing paradigms with economics. Then I tried to make sense of whatever information I gathered through summaries that I reproduced here with complete bibliographic acknowledgments. Whether all these summaries should be within quotes because they are essentially downloaded with few cosmetic changes is a decision that I made after discussing with two colleagues who are versed in the ethics of citing published research. The reader should understand that perhaps the whole chapter should be within quotes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnould, E. J. (1989). Toward a broadened theory of preference formation and the diffusion of innovations: Cases from Zinder Province, Niger Republic. The Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 239–267.
Bolacchi, G. (2008). A new paradigm for the integration of the social sciences. In N. K. Innis & N. K. Innis (Eds.), Reflections on adaptive behavior: Essays in honor of J. E. R. Staddon (pp. 315–353). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Belk, R. W., & Coon, G. S. (1993). Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. The Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 393–417.
Bickel, W. K., Hughes, J. R., DeGrandpre, R. J., & Higgins, S. T. (1992). Behavioral economics of drug self-administration: IV. The effects of response requirement on the consumption of and interaction between concurrently available coffee and cigarettes. Psychopharmacology, 107, 211–216.
Bierhoff, H., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2006). How to explain prosocial and solidarity behavior: A comparison of framing theory with related meta-theoretical paradigms. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, S. Lindenberg, D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological (pp. 225–242). New York, NY: Springer Science.
Birch, C., & Paul, D. (2003). Life and work: Challenging economic man. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Block, L., & Kramer, T. (2009). The effect of superstitious beliefs on performance expectations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 161–169.
Bose, S., & Thomas, K. (2007). Valuation of intellectual capital in knowledge-based firms: The need for new methods in a changing economic paradigm. Management Decision, 45, 1484–1496.
Campbell, C. (1991). Consumption: The new wave of research in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 57–74.
Chen, C. C., Peng, M. W., & Saparito, P. A. (2002). Individualism, collectivism, and opportunism: A cultural perspective on transaction cost economics. Journal of Management, 28, 567–583.
Conceição, P., & Heitor, M. V. (2003). Systems of innovation and competence building across diversity: Learning from the Portuguese path in the European context. In L. V. Shavinina & L. V. Shavinina (Eds.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 945–975). New York: Elsevier Science.
David, P., & Vicarelli, G. (1989). Social and economic aspects of the family in an Italian peripheral area. Marriage & Family Review, 14, 145–157.
de Souza, R. (2009). Creating “communicative spaces”: A case of NGO community organizing for HIV/AIDS prevention. Health Communication, 24, 692–702.
Derné, S. (1994). Structural realities, persistent dilemmas, and the construction of emotional paradigms: Love in three cultures. In W. M. Wentworth, J. Ryan, W. M. Wentworth, & J. Ryan (Eds.), Social perspectives on emotion (Vol. 2, pp. 281–308). New York: Elsevier Science/JAI.
Epstein, L. H., Salvy, S. J., Carr, K. A., Dearing, K. K., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Food reinforcement, delay discounting and obesity. Physiology and Behavior, 100, 438–445.
Etzioni, A. (1986). Socio-economics: A proposal for a new interdisciplinary field. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 475–482.
Fetchenhauer, D., & Dunning, D. (2009). Do people trust too much or too little? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 263–276.
Fetchenhauer, D., Flashe, A., Buunk, A. P., & Lindenberg, S. (Eds.). (2006). Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives. New York: Springer-Science.
Foster, J. (1997). Individuals, communities and organizations: A communitarian paradigm for cross-cultural enterprise. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A, 57, 4532.
Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (Eds.). (2007). Economics and psychology: A promising new cross-disciplinary field. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gagné, M. (2008). Review of ‘Economics and psychology: A promising new cross-disciplinary field’. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 343–344.
Gassenheimer, J. B., Houston, F. S., & Davis, J. (1998). The role of economic value, social value, and perceptions of fairness in interorganizational relationship retention decisions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 322–337.
Glimcher, P. W. (2003). Decisions, uncertainty, and the brain: The science of neuroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Godard, J. (2002). Institutional environments, employer practices, and states in liberal market economies. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 41, 249–286.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2010). Experimental and correlational analyses of delay and probability discounting. In G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 67–92). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Grönroos, C. (1994). From marketing mix to relationship marketing: Towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decision, 32, 4–20.
Guinote, A., & Vescio, T. K. (Eds.). (2010). The social psychology of power. New York: Guilford.
Hare, T. A., O’Doherty, J., Camerer, C. F., Schultz, W., & Range, A. (2008). Dissociating the role of the orbitofrontal cortex and the striatum in the computation of goal values and prediction errors. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(22), 5623–5630.
Hesterly, W. S., Liebeskind, J., & Zenger, T. R. (1990). Organizational economics: An impending revolution in organization theory? The Academy of Management Review, 15, 402–420.
Hollenbeck, C. R., Peters, C., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Gift giving: A community paradigm. Psychology and Marketing, 23, 573–595.
Hubbard, S. (2004). Disability studies and health care curriculum: The great divide. Journal of Allied Health, 33, 184–188.
Kayaalp, O. (1989). Reconciling economic postulates: Does ‘adaptive’ egoism satisfice? Journal of Behavioral Economics, 18, 289–306.
Kilbourne, W. E. (2006). The role of the dominant social paradigm in the quality of life/environmental interface. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 39–61.
Kilbourne, W. E., Beckmann, S. C., Lewis, A., & Van Dam, Y. (2001). A multinational examination of the role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes of university students. Environment and Behavior, 33, 209–228.
L’Abate, L. (2011a). Hurt feelings: Theory and research in intimate relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press.
L’Abate, L. (2011b). The seven sources of pleasure: Making way for the upside in the midst of modern demands. Newport, CT: Praeger.
L’Abate, L., Cusinato, M., Maino, E., Colesso, W., & Scilletta, C. (2010). Relational competence theory: Research and mental health applications. New York: Springer-Science.
Lamal, P. A. (1992). Behavior analysis and socio-economics: Some similarities and differences. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 21, 173–180.
Lindbladh, E., & Lyttkens, C. (2002). Habit versus choice: The process of decision-making in health-related behaviour. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 451–465.
Lindenberg, S. (2006). Prosocial behavior, solidarity, and framing processes. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk, S. Lindenberg, D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 23–44). New York, NY: Springer Science.
Lutz, C. (1988). Unnatural emotions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (Eds.). (2010). Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
McWilliams, A., & Smart, D. L. (1993). Efficiency v. structure-conduct-performance: Implications for strategy research and practice. Journal of Management, 19, 63–78.
Naylor, L. A. (2004). Review of ‘Life and work: Challenging economic man’. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 228–231.
Nida-Rümelin, J. (1991). Practical reason or metapreferences? An undogmatic defense of Kantian morality. Theory and Decision, 30, 133–162.
Ortmann, A., & Rydval, O. (2004). Review of ‘Decisions, uncertainty, and the brain. The science of neuroeconomics’. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 891–894.
Pirages, D. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1974). Ark II: Social response to environmental imperatives. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
Rafferty, J. (2001). The synthesis of economic organization and the management of change: Intercultural transferability and the Japanese paradigm. Management Decision, 39, 415–420.
Savani, K., Markus, H., & Conner, A. L. (2008). Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 861–876.
Sears, D. O. (1991). Socio-economics: Challenge to the neoclassical economic paradigm. Psychological Science, 2, 12–15.
Shaddock, A. J. (2003). People with disabilities in the era of the ‘triple bottom line’. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 28, 90–93.
Shapiro, S. P. (2005). Agency theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 263–284.
Storberg-Walker, J. (2009). Heterodox economics, social capital, and HRD: Moving beyond the limits of the neoclassical paradigm. Human Resource Development Review, 8, 97–119.
Timmermann, D. (1995). Human capital theory and the individualization theorem. In G. Neubauer & K. Hurrelmann (Eds.), Individualization in childhood and adolescence (pp. 223–245). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
van den Ende, J., & Dolfsma, W. (2005). Technology-push, demand-pull and the shaping of technological paradigms – Patterns in the development of computing technology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15, 83–99.
Wendlandt, M., & Schrader, U. (2007). Consumer reactance against loyalty programs. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24, 293–304.
Zafirovski, M. (1998). Socio-economics and rational choice theory: Specification of their relations. The Journal of SocioEconomics, 27, 165–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
L’Abate, L. (2012). Economics. In: L'Abate, L. (eds) Paradigms in Theory Construction. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0914-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0914-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0913-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0914-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)