Skip to main content

No-Collapse Physics and Consciousness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Frontiers of the Mind-Brain Relationship

Part of the book series: Mindfulness in Behavioral Health ((MIBH))

Abstract

This chapter first reviews strands of work in philosophy, psychology and physics which, taken together, undermine the world-views of both the Cartesian duality of body and soul, and the mechanistic picture of a system governed only by universal deterministic law. Starting from an alternative polarity suggested by recent work in psychology and using established ideas from modern quantum physics, a provisional structure is presented for an alternative world view. The consequences of this for future research are indicated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, S. (1920). Space, time, deity. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batthyany, A. (2009). Mental causation and free will after Libet and Soon: Reclaiming conscious agency. In A. Batthyany & A. C. Elitzur (Eds.), Irreducibly conscious: Selected papers on consciousness (p. 135ff). Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 200–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C. J. S. (2001). The histories interpretation: Stability instead of consistency? Foundations of Physics Letters, 14(2), 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C. J. S. (2007). The role of quantum physics in the theory of subjective consciousness. Mind and Matter, 5(1), 45–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C. J. S. (2008). A new quantum theoretical framework for parapsychology. European Journal of Parapsychology, 23(1), 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C. J. S., & King, M. (2006). Laszlo and McTaggart – in the light of this thing called Physics, Network Review (pp. 6–11). Winter 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, P. D. (2004). Emergence: Us from it. In J. D. Barrow, C. W. Davies, & C. L. Harper Jr. (Eds.), Science and ultimate reality (pp. 577–606). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Quincey, C. (2002). Radical nature: Rediscovering the soul of matter. Montpelier: Invisible Cities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. (1990). Quantum Theory and the Brain, Proceedings of the Royal Society Series A, 427 (pp. 43–93). London

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, A., & Isham, C. (2011). “What is a thing?” Topos theory in the foundations of physics. In B. Coecke (Ed.), New structures for physics, lecture notes in physics (Vol. 813, pp. 753–941). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowker, F., & Kent, A. (1996). On the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 82, 1575–1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, J. N. (2002). Revisioning transpersonal theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giulini, D., Joos, E., Kiefer, C., Kupsch, J., Stamatescu, I.-O., & Zeh, H. D. (1996). Decoherence and the appearance of a classical world. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, L., & Routley, R. (1973). The logic of significance and context (Vol. 1). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. B. (1984). Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 36, 219–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (1996). Conscious events as orchestrated space-time selections. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(1), 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartle, J. (1991). The quantum mechanics of cosmology. In S. Coleman, P. Hartle, T. Piran, & S. Weinberg (Eds.), Quantum cosmology and baby universes. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The large scale structure of space-time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1967). What is a Thing? (W. B. Barton Jr. & V. Deutsch, Trans.). Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, M.-W. (1998). The rainbow and the worm: The physics of organisms (2nd ed.). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, F. (1957). The black cloud. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. (2003). Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75, 281–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, M. (1989). Mind brain and the quantum: the compound ‘I’. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, F., & Bauer, E. (1939). La théorie de l’observation en mécanique quantique. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, F., & Bauer, E. (1983). The theory of observation in quantum mechanics (translation of the above). In J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 217–259). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magyar, G., & Mandel, L. (1963). Interference fringes produced by superposition of two independent maser light beams. Nature, 198, 255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, F. (2003). For love of matter: A contemporary panpsychism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matte Blanco, I. (1998). The unconscious as infinite sets: An essay in bi-logic. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFee, G. (2000). Free will. Teddington: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGilchrist, I. (2009). The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the Western world. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, D. N. (2001). Mindless sensationalism: A quantum framework for consciousness. In Q. Smith & A. Jokic (Eds.), Consciousness: New philosophical essays (pp. 468–506). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (2004). The road to reality: A complete guide to the laws of the universe (pp. 846–856). London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. G., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radin, D. (1997). The conscious universe. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routley, R., Plumwood, V., Meyer, R. K., & Brady, R. T. (1982). Relevant logics and their rivals, part 1, the basic philosophical and semantical library. Atascadero: Ridgeview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savile, A. (2005). Kant’s critique of pure reason: An orientation to the central theme. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosshauer, M. (2006). Experimental motivation and empirical consistency in minimal no-­collapse quantum mechanics. Annals of Physics, 321, 112–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrbina, D. (2005). Panpsychism in the west. Cambridge: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, E. J. (1994). Quantum theory and the need for consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1(2), 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. (1989). Real presences. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D., & Barnard, P. J. (1993). Affect, cognition and change: Remodelling depressive thought. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Atten, M. (2009). The development of intuitionistic logic. In N. Edward Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2011 Edition). Retrieved, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/intuitionistic-logic-development/.

  • Van Inwagen, P. (1983). An essay on free will. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1993). The embodied mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velmans, M. (2000). Understanding consciousness. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J. A. (1994). At home in the universe. New York: AIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1920). The concept of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, H. D. (1970). On the interpretation of measurements in quantum theory. Foundations of Physics, 1, 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Clarke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clarke, C. (2012). No-Collapse Physics and Consciousness. In: Moreira-Almeida, A., Santana Santos, F. (eds) Exploring Frontiers of the Mind-Brain Relationship. Mindfulness in Behavioral Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0647-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics