Abstract
To understand the process of image formation in the scanning electron microscope, we must examine the component parts of the image formation system: the scanning system, the signal detectors, the amplifiers, and the display. For this discussion, the upper portion of the electron probe forming system, i.e., the electron gun and the upper condenser lenses, is relatively unimportant. Details of these components have been given in the discussion of electron optics in Chapter II. The entire instrument is discussed in detail by Oatley.(1) We shall assume that a focused electron probe of diameter d p is produced by the electron gun and lenses. The components of the image formation system are illustrated in Figure 1, and with this diagram we shall follow the sequence of events in the formation of the image. The electron beam travels down the optical axis of the electron optical column from the gun through the first two condenser lenses with each lens progressively demagnifying the beam. When the beam encounters the first set of scan coils, it is deflected off the optical axis. The second (lower) set of scan coils acts on the deflected beam and produces a second deflection, causing the beam to again cross through the optical axis. The scan coils rest in the bore of the final lens, and during passage
of the scan coils, the beam is further demagnified by the action of this lens, which is normally the strongest lens in the microscope.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. W. Oatley, The Scanning Electron Microscope, Part 1, “The Instrument,” Cambridge, The University Press (1972).
V. K. Zworykin, J. Hillier, and R. L. Snyder, ASTM Bull, 117, 15 (1942).
T. E. Everhart and R. F. M. Thornley, J. Sci. Instr., 37, 246 (1960).
T. E. Everhart, in Proceedings of the 3rd Stereoscan Colloquium, Morton Grove, Illinois, Kent Cambridge Scientific, (1970), p. 1.
J. B. Pawley, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 27.
A. V. Crewe, M. Isaacson, and D. Johnson, Rev. Sci. Instr., 41, 20 (1970).
H. Yakowitz, C. E. Fiori, and D. E. Newbury, in SEM/1973, Proceedings of the 6th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IIRTI, Chicago, Illinois (1973), p. 173.
M. D. Muir and D. B. Holt, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 135.
E. M. Horl and E. Mugschl, in Proceedings of the 5th Congress on Electron Microscopy, Conference Series No. 14, Institute of Physics, London (1972), p. 502.
C. G. van Essen, J. Phys. E 7(2), 98 (1974).
K. F. J. Heinrich, in X-Ray Optics and Microanalysis (R. Castaing, P. Deschamps, J. Philibert, eds.) (1966), p. 159.
T. E. Everhart, O. C. Wells, and C. W. Oatley, J. Electron. Control, 7, 97 (1959).
A. Rose, Advances in Electronics (L. Marton, ed.), Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York (1948), p. 131.
O. C. Wells, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illino’s (1974), p. 1.
A. N. Broers, in Microprobe Analysis (C. A. Andersen, ed.), Wiley, New York (1973), p. 83.
C. W. Oatley, W. C. Nixon, and R. F. W. Pease, in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics (L. Marton, ed.), Academic Press, New York (1965), p. 181.
D. C. Joy, in SEM/1973, Proceedings of the 6th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1973), p. 743.
R. S. Longhurst, Geometrical and Physical Optics, Longmans, London, (1957). p. 207.
R. J. Woolf and D. C. Joy, in Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Meeting of EMAG, Institute of Physics, 1971 (W. C. Nixon, ed.), Institute of Physics, London (1971), p. 34.
G. R. Booker, D. C. Joy, J. P. Spencer, and C. J. Humphreys, in SEM/1973, Proceedings of the 6th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1973), p. 251.
A. N. Broers, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 9.
A. V. Crewe, D. N. Eggenberger, J. Wall, and L. M. Welter, Rev. Sci. Instr., 39, 576 (1968).
M. Isaacson, J. Langmore, and J. Wall, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 19.
J. B. Le Poole, J. Kramer, and K. D. van der Mast, in Proceedings of the 5th European Congress on Electron Microscopy, 1972, Conference Series No. 14, Institute of Physics, London (1972), p. 8.
A. N. Broers, in Microprobe Analysis (C. A. Andersen, ed.), Wiley, New York, (1973), p. 100 and Figure 6.
O. C. Wells, Appl. Phys. Lett, 19, 232 (1971).
J. Lebiedzik, K. G. Burke, S. Troutman, G. G. Johnson, Jr., and E. W. White, in SEM/1973, Proceedings of the 6th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1973), p. 121.
C. E. Fiori, H. Yakowitz, and D. E. Newbury, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 167.
K. F. J. Heinrich, C. E. Fiori, and H. Yakowitz, Science, 167, 1129 (1970).
P. C. Goldmark and J. J. Hollywood, Proc. IRE, 39, 1314 (1951).
M. Oron and V. Tamir, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1975 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newbury, D.E. (1975). Image Formation in the Scanning Electron Microscope. In: Goldstein, J.I., Yakowitz, H. (eds) Practical Scanning Electron Microscopy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4422-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4422-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4424-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4422-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive