Skip to main content

Image Formation in the Scanning Electron Microscope

  • Chapter
Practical Scanning Electron Microscopy

Abstract

To understand the process of image formation in the scanning electron microscope, we must examine the component parts of the image formation system: the scanning system, the signal detectors, the amplifiers, and the display. For this discussion, the upper portion of the electron probe forming system, i.e., the electron gun and the upper condenser lenses, is relatively unimportant. Details of these components have been given in the discussion of electron optics in Chapter II. The entire instrument is discussed in detail by Oatley.(1) We shall assume that a focused electron probe of diameter d p is produced by the electron gun and lenses. The components of the image formation system are illustrated in Figure 1, and with this diagram we shall follow the sequence of events in the formation of the image. The electron beam travels down the optical axis of the electron optical column from the gun through the first two condenser lenses with each lens progressively demagnifying the beam. When the beam encounters the first set of scan coils, it is deflected off the optical axis. The second (lower) set of scan coils acts on the deflected beam and produces a second deflection, causing the beam to again cross through the optical axis. The scan coils rest in the bore of the final lens, and during passage

Image formation system in the scanning electron microscope. FA, final aperture; SD, solid state electron detector; ET, Everhart-Thornley electron detector; PM, photomultiplier; S, scintillator; W, ED, wavelength- and/or energy-dispersive x-ray detectors; CRT, cathode ray tube.

of the scan coils, the beam is further demagnified by the action of this lens, which is normally the strongest lens in the microscope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. W. Oatley, The Scanning Electron Microscope, Part 1, “The Instrument,” Cambridge, The University Press (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. K. Zworykin, J. Hillier, and R. L. Snyder, ASTM Bull, 117, 15 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. E. Everhart and R. F. M. Thornley, J. Sci. Instr., 37, 246 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. E. Everhart, in Proceedings of the 3rd Stereoscan Colloquium, Morton Grove, Illinois, Kent Cambridge Scientific, (1970), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. B. Pawley, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. V. Crewe, M. Isaacson, and D. Johnson, Rev. Sci. Instr., 41, 20 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Yakowitz, C. E. Fiori, and D. E. Newbury, in SEM/1973, Proceedings of the 6th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IIRTI, Chicago, Illinois (1973), p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. D. Muir and D. B. Holt, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. M. Horl and E. Mugschl, in Proceedings of the 5th Congress on Electron Microscopy, Conference Series No. 14, Institute of Physics, London (1972), p. 502.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. G. van Essen, J. Phys. E 7(2), 98 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K. F. J. Heinrich, in X-Ray Optics and Microanalysis (R. Castaing, P. Deschamps, J. Philibert, eds.) (1966), p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. E. Everhart, O. C. Wells, and C. W. Oatley, J. Electron. Control, 7, 97 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Rose, Advances in Electronics (L. Marton, ed.), Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York (1948), p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. C. Wells, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illino’s (1974), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. N. Broers, in Microprobe Analysis (C. A. Andersen, ed.), Wiley, New York (1973), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. W. Oatley, W. C. Nixon, and R. F. W. Pease, in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics (L. Marton, ed.), Academic Press, New York (1965), p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. C. Joy, in SEM/1973, Proceedings of the 6th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1973), p. 743.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. S. Longhurst, Geometrical and Physical Optics, Longmans, London, (1957). p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. J. Woolf and D. C. Joy, in Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Meeting of EMAG, Institute of Physics, 1971 (W. C. Nixon, ed.), Institute of Physics, London (1971), p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. R. Booker, D. C. Joy, J. P. Spencer, and C. J. Humphreys, in SEM/1973, Proceedings of the 6th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1973), p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. N. Broers, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. V. Crewe, D. N. Eggenberger, J. Wall, and L. M. Welter, Rev. Sci. Instr., 39, 576 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Isaacson, J. Langmore, and J. Wall, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. B. Le Poole, J. Kramer, and K. D. van der Mast, in Proceedings of the 5th European Congress on Electron Microscopy, 1972, Conference Series No. 14, Institute of Physics, London (1972), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. N. Broers, in Microprobe Analysis (C. A. Andersen, ed.), Wiley, New York, (1973), p. 100 and Figure 6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. O. C. Wells, Appl. Phys. Lett, 19, 232 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Lebiedzik, K. G. Burke, S. Troutman, G. G. Johnson, Jr., and E. W. White, in SEM/1973, Proceedings of the 6th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1973), p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. E. Fiori, H. Yakowitz, and D. E. Newbury, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. F. J. Heinrich, C. E. Fiori, and H. Yakowitz, Science, 167, 1129 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. P. C. Goldmark and J. J. Hollywood, Proc. IRE, 39, 1314 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Oron and V. Tamir, in SEM/1974, Proceedings of the 7th Annual SEM Symposium (O. Johari, ed.), IITRI, Chicago, Illinois (1974), p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newbury, D.E. (1975). Image Formation in the Scanning Electron Microscope. In: Goldstein, J.I., Yakowitz, H. (eds) Practical Scanning Electron Microscopy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4422-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4422-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-4424-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-4422-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics