Ion Distribution and Polyion Conformation Displayed by Amphiphilic Polyacids in Aqueous and Organic Media

  • R. Varoqui
  • E. Pefferkorn
Part of the Polymer Science and Technology book series (NISS, volume 30)

Abstract

The properties of aqueous and n-octanol solutions of amphiphilic polyelectrolytes — the polysoaps of maleic acid and cetyl (or decyl) vinyl ether — are described. Some important differences between the conformation and the counter-ion distribution in the two media are discussed. In water, the occurrence of intra-molecular hydrophobic interactions results in a compact conformation, which is however not that of a spherical mono-molecular micelle with no water incorporated. From conductivity and tracer self-diffusion measurements, it is shown that more than 20% of the alkali metal carboxylate groups are ionized. The polysoaps in n-octanol behave quite differently: although metal carboxylate groups can only be accommodated in organic media with a considerable free energy expense, an “inverted” compact intra-molecular micelle structure is not observed. It is assumed that a redistribution of metal carboxylate groups along the chain enables the partially neutralized form of the polymer to be solubilized in a low dielectric constant medium without undergoing a conformational collapse. The idea that carboxylate (R-COOA) and carboxylic (R-COOH) monomeric groups are not randomly mixed along the chain is inferred from the determination of the excess free energies of these groups and from conductivity measurements. A theoretical model in which the polymer is treated as an uncharged coil with all small metal ions “site bound” and non-homogeneously distributed, yields realistic pair contact energies and overall qualitative agreement with the experimental findings.

Keywords

Entropy Hydrolysis Hydration Benzene Titration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    U. P. Strauss, N. L. Gershfeld, J. Phys. Chem., 58, 747 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Varoqui, U. P. Strauss, J. Phys. Chem., 72, 2507 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. L. Dubin, U. P. Strauss, J. Phys., 74, 2842 (1970)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Ito, Y. Yamashita, J. Colloid Sci., 19, 152 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Varoqui, E. Pefferkorn, J. Phys. Chem., 79, 169 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Pefferkorn, R. Varoqui, J. Coll. and Polym. Sci., 255, 222 (1977); 255, 543 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Pefferkorn, R. Varoqui, J. Coll. and Interface Sci., 52, 89 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Pefferhorn, R. Varoqui and H. Benoit, J. Applied Polymer Sci., 19, 2929 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. M. Fowkes, M. J. Schick, A. Bondi, J. Coll. Science, 15, 531 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z. Wojtczak, C. Strazielle, R. Varoqui, H. Benoit, European Polym. J., 6, 247 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Pefferkorn, R. Varoqui, Eur. Polym. J., 6, 663 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Tanford, “Physical Chemistry of Macromolecules”, John Wiley, New York 1961 p. 339Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Simha, J. Phys. Chem., 44, 25 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Schmitt, R. Varoqui, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Transactions II, 69, 1087 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. J. Flory, “Principles of Polymer Chemistry”, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1953, Chapt. XIVGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. M. Fuoss and T. Shedlovsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 71, 1496 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Eisenberg and E. F. Casassa, J. Polymer Sci., 47, 29 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Varoqui
    • 1
  • E. Pefferkorn
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre de Recherches sur les MacromoleculesCNRS 6Strasbourg-CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations