Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library ((TDLC,volume 20))

  • 245 Accesses

Abstract

An event is said to be common belief (CB) if every individual in the group believes it, believes that every individual in the group believes it, and so on ad infinitum. Following an equally well-received (albeit questionable) view, a known event must be true. Hence the standard definition of common knowledge (CK), as perhaps first introduced by Lewis (1969) and as formalized in Aumann’s (1976) classic paper: an event is said to be CK if it is true, every individual in the group knows it, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderlini, L.: 1990, “Some Notes on Church’s Thesis and the Theory of the Games”, Theory and Decision 29, 19–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R.J.: 1976, ‘Agreeing to Disagree’, The Annals of Statistics 4, 1236–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R.J.: 1987, ‘Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality’, Econometrica 55, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, M.: 1985, ‘Some Extensions of a Claim of Aumann in an Axiomatic Model of Knowledge’, Journal of Economic Theory 37, 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, M.: 1992, ‘The Acquisition of Common Knowledge’, in C. Bicchieri and M.L. Dalla Chiara (editors), Knowledge, Belief and Strategic Interaction, 285–316, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, M.: 1994, ‘The Epistemic Structure of a Theory of a Game’, Theory and Decision 37, 7–48 (this issue).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, M.: forthcoming, ‘When Do We Have Information Partitions?’, in M. Dempster et al. (editors), Mathematical Models in Economics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J.: 1981, ‘Scenes and Other Situations’, Journal of Philosophy 78, 369–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J.: 1989, The Situation in Logic, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. and A. Brandenburger: 1990, ‘Common Knowledge and Game Theory’, in K. Binmore, Essays on the Foundations of Game Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. and H.S. Shin: 1992, ‘Algorithmic Knowledge and Game Theory’, in C. Bicchieri and M.L. Dalla Chiara (editors), Knowledge, Belief and Strategic Interaction, 141–154, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böge, W. and T. Eisele: 1979, ‘On Solutions of Bayesian Games’, International Journal of Game Theory 8, 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G. and R.C. Jeffrey: 1974, Computability and Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A.: 1992, ‘Knowledge and Equilibria in Games’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A. and E. Dekel: 1987, ‘Common Knowledge with Probability 1’, Journal of Mathematical Economics 16, 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A. and E. Dekel: 1993, ‘Hierarchies of Beliefs and Common Knowledge’, Journal of Economic Theory 59, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canning, D.: 1992, ‘Rationality, Computability, and Nash Equilibrium’, Econometrica 60, 877–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chellas, B.F.: 1980, Modal Logic, an Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubucs, J.: 1992, ‘Omniscience logique et frictions cognitives’, in D. Andler et al. (editors), Epistémologie et cognition, 115–131, Mardaga, Liège.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, J.P.: 1989, ‘Convention et Common Knowledge’, Revue économique 40, 361–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, R., J.Y. Halpern, and M.Y. Vardi: 1984, ‘A Model-Theoretic Analysis of Knowledge’, in Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 268–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, R., J.Y. Halpern, and M.Y. Vardi: 1984, ‘A Model-Theoretic Analysis of Knowledge’ Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 38, 382–428, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, R. and M.Y. Vardi: 1985, ‘An Internal Semantics for Modal Logic’, in Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 305–315, Providence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geanakoplos, J.D.: 1992, ‘Common Knowledge’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 53–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geanakoplos, J.D. and H.M. Polemarchakis: 1982, ‘We Can’t Disagree Forever’, Journal of Economic Theory 26, 363–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettier, E.: 1963, ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, Analysis 23, 121–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillet, E. and P. Gochet: 1993, ‘La logique de la connaissance: le problème de l’omniscience logique’, Dialectica 47, 143–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J.Y. and Y.O. Moses: 1984, ‘Knowledge and Common Knowledge in a Distributed Environment’, in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Principles of Distributed Computing, 50–61, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J.Y. and Y.O. Moses: 1984, ‘Knowledge and Common Knowledge in a Distributed Environment’, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 37, 549–587, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J.Y. and Y.O. Moses: 1985, ‘A Guide to the Modal Logic of Knowledge’, in Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-85), 480–490, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J.Y. and Y.O. Moses: 1992, ‘A Guide to Completeness and Complexity for Modal Logics of Knowledge and Belief’, Artificial Intelligence 54, 319–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz, A.: 1993, ‘The Bayesian Formulation of Incomplete Information — The Non-Compact Case’, International Journal of Game Theory 21, 329–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G.E. and M.J. Cresswell: 1984, A Companion to Modal Logic, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D.: 1984, ‘Knowledge, Common Knowledge and Related Puzzles’, in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Principles of Distributed Computing, 62–67, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K.: 1969, Convention. A Philosophical Study, Harvard University Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lismont, L.: 1993a, ‘La connaissance commune en logique modale’, Mathematical Logic Quarterly 39, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lismont, L.: 1993b, ‘Common Knowledge. Relating Anti-Founded Situation Semantics to Neighbourhood Semantics’, Prépublications du Département de Mathématiques, Université Catholique de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lismont, L. and P. Mongin: 1993, ‘Belief Closure: A Semantics of Common Knowledge for Modal Propositional Logic’, CORE Discussion Paper 9339, Université Catholique de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, J-F. and S. Zamir: 1985, ‘Formulation of Bayesian Analysis for Games with Incomplete Information’, International Journal of Game Theory 14, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P.: 1981, ‘An Axiomatic Characterization of Common Knowledge’, Econometrica 49, 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and N. Stokey: 1982, information, ‘Trade and Common Knowledge’, Journal of Economic Theory 26, 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modica, S. and A. Rustichini: 1994, ‘Awareness and Partitional Information Structures’, Theory and Decision 37, 107–124 (this issue).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monderer, D. and D. Samet: 1989, ‘Approximating Common Knowledge with Common Beliefs’, Games and Economic Behavior 1, 170–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongin, P.: 1994, ‘Some Connections between Epistemic Logic and the Theory of Nonadditive Probability’, in P. Humphreys (editor), Patrick Suppes, Scientific Philosopher, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mongin, P.: forthcoming, ‘Une interprétation logique du théorème de Mertens et Zamir’, in J. Dubucs and F. Lepage (editors), Intelligence artificielle et logiques non-classiques: le point de vue philosophique, Hermès, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh, R. and P. Krasucki: 1990, ‘Communication, Consensus and Knowledge’, Journal of Economic Theory 52, 178–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reny, P.J.: 1992, ‘Rationality in Extensive-Form Games’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samet, D.: 1990, ‘Ignoring Ignorance and Agreeing to Disagree’, Journal of Economic Theory 52, 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samet, D.: 1992, ‘Agreeing to Disagree in Infinite Information Structures’, International Journal of Game Theory 21, 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H.S.: 1993, ‘Logical Structure of Common Knowledge’, Journal of Economic Theory 60, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H.S. and T. Williamson: 1994, ‘Representing the Knowledge of Turing Machines’, Theory and Decision 37, 125–146 (this issue).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986, Relevance, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1991, ‘The Problem of Logical Omniscience, I’, Synthese 89, 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1994, ‘On the Evaluation of Solution Concepts’, Theory and Decision 37, 49–73 (this issue).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigum, B.: 1990, Towards a Formal Science of Economics, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usberti, G.: 1992, ‘Connaissance et croyance: pour une épistémologie dualiste’, in D. Andler et al. (editors), Epistémologie et cognition, Mardaga, Liège.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walliser, B.: 1991, ‘Logique épistémique et théorie des jeux’, Revue économique 42, 801–831.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lismont, L., Mongin, P. (1997). On the Logic of Common Belief and Common Knowledge. In: Bacharach, M., Gérard-Varet, LA., Mongin, P., Shin, H.S. (eds) Epistemic Logic and the Theory of Games and Decisions. Theory and Decision Library, vol 20. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1139-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1139-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4804-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-1139-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics