Skip to main content

Comparative Studies of Antisera Against Different Toxins

  • Chapter
Natural Toxins 2

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 391))

  • 459 Accesses

Abstract

Snake venom main components are proteins and peptides, many of them presenting enzymatic and/or toxic activities. Neutralization of these activities is one of the goals of envenomation treatment and this is usually achieved by mean of serotherapy. Snake venom antisera are produced in horses and, due to high toxicity of the immunogens, about 10% of the animals die after prime injection. Previous works of our group have shown gamma rays to attenuate snake venom toxicity without affecting its immunological properties, inducing an enhanced humoral and cellular immune response without the deleterious effects of native venom [1] [2] [3]. The venom attenuation induced by irradiation is a result of interaction of the venom components with the free radicals formed by water radiolysis, mainly hydroxyl radical and hidrated electron. These radicals act removing hidrogens, breaking S-S bonds or promoting deamination. As a result of the interaction of these radicals and others lesser known with the venom components, larger molecular weight aggregates are formed, with few if any toxic or enzymatic activity but presenting epitopes that induce a protective response when the irradiated venom is employed as immunogen [3]. These facts point toward venom irradiation as a solution to improve sera production, de Paula et Al [4], when immunizing rabbits with irradiated crotoxin, South American rattlesnake’s main toxin, obtained polyclonal antibodies specific for the Crotalus genus and with high neutralizing capacity. These immunoglobulins proved to be useful as diagnostic and therapeutic agents. C.d.terrificus neurotoxic venom is composed by few protein fractions, mainly crotoxin, while the Brazilian most prevalent snake on what refers to accidents (85%), Bothrops sp, venom has proteolytic and coagulant activities, with several proteins and fractions involved, with phospholipase activity and minor neurotoxicity, serotherapy being the main treatment. These activities generate intense local signs in animals used in antisera production, with losses and low efficiency. In the present work, we detoxified Bothrops jararaca venom by mean of gamma radiation, immunized rabbits with the obtained toxoid and investigated the raised antisera efficiency against toxicity, cross-reactivity with other snake venoms from the Elapid and Crotalid group and neutralization of phospholipase A2 activity which, as suggested by other authors [5], is an indicator of antisera potency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Murata, Y — Efeitos da radiação gama no veneno de Crotalus durissus terrificus. São Paulo, 1988. ( Dissertação de mestrado, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guarnieri, M.C. — Estudo dos efeitos da radiação gama de 60Co nas propriedades bioquómicas, biológicas e imunolégicas do veneno de Bothrops jararaca. São Paulo, 1992. (tese de doutorado, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nascimiento, N. — Estudo comparativo entre crotoxina nativa e irradiada. Aspectos bioquímicos e farmacológicos. São Paulo, 1991. ( Dissertação de mestrado, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares).

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Paula, R.A.; Nascimento, N.; Spencer, P.J.; Andriani, E.P.; Sanalios, R.B. & Rogero, J.R — Reatividade dos anti-soros produzidos contra venenos atenuados por radiação gama frente a diferentes venenos. IX Reunião Anual da Federação de Sociedades de Biologia Experimental (FESBE., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guttiérrez, J.M.; Avila, C; Rojas, E. & Cerdas, L. — An alternative in vitro method for testing the potency of polyvalent antivenom produced in Costa Rica. Toxicon 26: 411 – 413, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization — Progress in characterization of venoms and standardization of antivenoms. Geneva, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harlow, E. & Lane, D. Eds: Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Labs ed.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spencer, P.J.; Andriani, E.P.; Nascimento, N.; De Paula, R.A.; Sanalios, R.B. & Rogero, J.R. — Improvement of an inexpensive method for phospholipase A2 activity determination. IX Reunião da Sociedade Brasileira de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dos-Santos, M.C.; Gonçalves, L.R.C.; Fortes-Dias, C.L.; Cury, Y; Gutiérrez, J.M. & Furtado, M.F. — A eficácia do antiveneno botrópico-crotálico na neutralização das principais atividades do veneno de Bothrops jararacussu. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 34: 77 – 83, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kini, R.M. & Evans, H.J. — A model to explain the pharmacological effects of snake venom phospholipases A2. Toxicon 27: 613 – 635, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nascimento, N., Spencer, P.J., de Paula, R.A., Andrade, H.F., Rogero, J.R. (1996). Comparative Studies of Antisera Against Different Toxins. In: Singh, B.R., Tu, A.T. (eds) Natural Toxins 2. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 391. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0361-9_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0361-9_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8016-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0361-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics