Skip to main content

The Evaluation System at the Maastricht Medical School

  • Chapter
New Directions for Medical Education

Abstract

In 1967, the Dutch government established its eighth medical school with the goal of providing a six-year program adapted to the changing needs of the health care system in The Netherlands. Its mandate was to develop educational approaches that reflected modern educational developments. As a result, and in contrast with the other seven Dutch medical schools, the six-year program is primarily oriented toward primary health care and community medicine and the educational approach is based on the principles of “problem-based-self-directed learning”.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM: Problem-based Learning—An Approach to Medical Education. New York, Springer Publishing Company, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ebel RL: Essentials of Educational Measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Halls Inc, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson J: The Multiple Choice Question in Medicine. London, Pitman Medical, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harden RM: Constructing multiple choice questions of the multiple true/false type. Med Ed 1979, 13: 305 - 312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Willoughby TL, Dimond EG, Smull NW: Correlation of Quarterly Profile Examination and National Board of Medical Examiner scores. Ed Psych Meas 1977; 37: 445 - 449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Willoughby, TL, Hutcheson SJ: Edumetric validity of the Quarterly Profile Examination. Ed Psych Meas 1978; 38: 1057 - 1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Willoughby TL: Quarterly Profile Examination. R.I.M.E. Exhibition Handout; Annual meeting of the Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harden RMcG, Stevenson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM: Assessment of clinical com-petence using objective structured clinical examinations. Brit Med J 1975; 1: 447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maatsch JL: An Introduction to Patient Games: Some fundamentals of Clinical Instruction. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Office of Medical Education Research and Development, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maatsch JL: Towards a testable theory of physician competence: An experimental analysis of a criterion-referenced specialty certification test library. New Orleans, LA, RIME Conference, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rimoldi HJA: The test of diagnostic skills. J MED ED 1961; 30: 73.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McGuire CH, Solomon CM: Construction and Use of Written Simulations. Chicago, IL, The Psychological Corporation, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Page GG, Fielding DW: Performance on PMP’s and performance in practice: Are they related? J Med Ed 1980; 55: 529.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Norman GR, Feightner JW: A comparison of behavior on simulated patients an patient management problems. Med Ed 1981; 15: 26 - 32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Newble DI, Hoare J, Baxter A: Patient management problems, issues of validity. Med Ed 1982; 16: 137 - 142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Royal College of General Practitioners: The Modified Essay Question. JR Coll Gen Pract 1971; 21: 373.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Knox JD: The Modified Essay Question. Dundee Scotland, Association for the Study of Medical Education, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barrows HS, Mitchell DLM: An innovative course in undergraduate neuroscience (an experiment in problem-based learning with “Problem-Boxes”). Brit J Med Ed 1975; 9 (4): 223 - 230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barrows HS, Tamblyn RM: The Portable Patient Problem Pack (P4), A problem- based learning unit. J Med Ed 1977; 52 (12): 1002 - 1004.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McCarthy WH: An assessment of the influence of cueing items in objective examinations. J Med Ed 1966; 41: 263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamblyn RM, Barrows HS, Gliva G: An initial evaluation of learning-units to facilitate problem solving and self-directed study (portable patient problem pack). Med Ed 1980; 14: 394 - 400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Coates G : Problem based methods of evaluation: the McMaster experience, in Metz JCM, Moll J, Walton HJ (eds): Examination in Medical Education, A Necessary Evil? Proceedings of the 1980 Annual Conference of the Association for Medical Education in Europe. Utrecht, Bunge, Scientific Publications, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leeder SR, Felleti Gl, Engle CE: Assessment—Help or hurdle? Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 1979; 16: 308 - 315.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verwijnen, M. et al. (1989). The Evaluation System at the Maastricht Medical School. In: Schmidt, H.G., Lipkin, M., de Vries, M.W., Greep, J.M. (eds) New Directions for Medical Education. Frontiers of Primary Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3472-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3472-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8114-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-3472-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics