Advertisement

Representing Knowledge About Words

  • J. T. Nutter
Conference paper
Part of the Workshops in Computing book series (WORKSHOPS COMP.)

Abstract

Most on-line lexicons contain only syntactic information. Semantic information is usually stored elsewhere, in a form inconsistent with the representation of the syntactic information. This paper reports on research toward developing a large on-line lexicon from machine-readable dictionaries, which contains both syntactic and semantic information in a uniform style. The fundamental theory is that of the relational lexicon; we describe relational lexicons, discuss our extensions to the usual theory of relational lexicons, rehearse very quickly some of the relations we are dealing with, and show how information for some simple entries is stored.

Keywords

Information Retrieval Semantic Information Semantic Relation Word Sense Virginia Polytechnic Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Ahlswede and Evens 1984]
    Ahlswede, T. E. and M. W. Evens. A Lexicon for a Medical Expert System. Proceedings of the Workshop on Relational Models of the Lexicon, Martha Evens (ed.), Stanford, CA, July 1984 (to appear).Google Scholar
  2. [Ahlswede and Evens 1988]
    Ahlswede, T. E. and M. W. Evens. Parsing vs. Text Processing in the Analysis of Dictionary Definitions, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Buffalo, June 1988, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [Apresyan et al. 1969]
    Apresyan, Y. D., I. A. Mel’cuk, and A. K. Zolkovsky. Semantics and Lexicography: Towards a New Type of Unilingual Dictionary. In Studies in Syntax and Semantics, ed. F. Kiefer, 1–33. Dordrecht — Holland: D. Reidel, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [Casagrande and Hale 1967]
    Casagrande, J. B. and K. L. Hale. 1967. Semantic Relations in Papago Folk Definitions. In D. Hymes and W. Bittle, eds., Studies in Southwestern Ethnolinguistics, Mouton, The Hague, 1967, 165–196.Google Scholar
  5. [Cline and Nutter 1989]
    Cline, B. E. and J. T. Nutter. Implications of Natural Categories for Natural Language Generation, Proceedings of the First Annual SNePS Workshop, Buffalo, New York, 13 November 1989 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  6. [Evens and Smith 1979]
    Evens, M.W. and R.N. Smith. A Lexicon for a Computer Question-Answering System. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, Microfiche 83: 193, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. [Evens et al. 1985]
    Evens, M. W., J. Vandendorpe, and Y.-C. Wang. Lexical Semantic Relations in Information Retrieval. In Humans and Machines: The Interface Through Language, S. Williams, ed., Ablex (Norwood, Ner Jersey ) 1985, 73–100.Google Scholar
  8. [Fox 1980]
    Fox, E. A. Lexical Relations: Enhancing Effectiveness of Information Retrieval. ACM SIGIR Forum 15:3 (Winter 1980 ) 6–35.Google Scholar
  9. [Fox 1987]
    Fox, E. A. Development of the CODER System: A Testbed for Artificial Intelligence Methods in Information Retrieval, Information Processing and Management 23: 4 (1987) 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [Fox and France 1987]
    Fox, E. A. and R. K. France. Architecture of an Expert System for Composite Document Analysis, Representation, and Retrieval, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 1 (1987) 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [Fox et al. 1988]
    Fox, E. A., J. T. Nutter, T. E. Ahlswede, M. W. Evens, and J. A. Markowitz. “Building a Large Thesaurus for Information Retrieval”, Proc. Second Conf. of Applied Natural Lang. Proc., Austin, February 1988, 101–108.Google Scholar
  12. [Fox et al. 1989]
    Fox, E. A., L. S. Heath and Q. F. Chen. An O(n log n) Algorithm for Finding Minimal Perfect Hash Functions. Department of Computer Science Technical Report 89–10, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061–0106, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. [France et al 1989]
    France, R. K., Q. F. Chen, and J. T. Nutter. LEND Design Specifications. Unpublished draft (available from the authors ) 1989.Google Scholar
  14. [Mel’cuk 1973]
    Mel’cuk, I. A. Towards a Linguistic ‘Meaning Text’ Model. In Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics, ed. F. Kiefer, D. Reidel (Dordrecht), 1973, 3357.Google Scholar
  15. [Mel’cuk 1988]
    Mel’cuk, I. A. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press (Albany) 1988.Google Scholar
  16. Nutter 1989] Nutter, J. T. A Lexical Relation Hierarchy. Department of Computer Science Technical Report TR 89–6, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.Google Scholar
  17. Nutter et al. 1989] Nutter, J.T., E.A. Fox, and M.W. Evens. Building a lexicon from machine-readable dictionaries for improved information retrieval. The Dynamic Text: Proc. ALLC/ACH 1989 (to appear).Google Scholar
  18. Shapiro 1979]Shapiro, S. C. The SNePS Semantic Network Processing System. In Associative Networks, N. Findler, ed., Academic Press (New York) 1979, 179–203.Google Scholar
  19. [Shapiro and Rapaport 1987]
    Shapiro, S. C. and W. J. Rapaport. SNePS Considered as a Fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network. In The Knowledge Frontier, N. Cercone and G. McCalla, eds., Springer-Verlag (New York) 1987, 263–315.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© British Computer Society 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. T. Nutter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations