Skip to main content

Users’ Data

Trails Analysis

  • Chapter
Technology-Enhanced Learning

With the development of Web-based distance learning environments, acquiring and analysing trails has become a very important issue for the technology-enhanced learning (TEL) community. We consider a trail (or a track or a trace) as the digital or non-digital record that learners~– or more generally, the different actors within a learning session in a TEL system~– leave behind. This chapter addresses the life cycle of such trails from a computer science point of view. In particular, we elaborate on the engineering and usage of the different kinds of trails by highlighting the main scientific issues raised by the trails analysis process and by presenting research findings from the Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • van den Akker, J., (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper & U. Hameyer, (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. E. (2007). Difficulties in inferring student knowledge from observations (and why you should care). In: C. Heiner, N. Heffernan & T. Barnes (Eds.), Educational Data Mining, Supplementary Proceedings AIED’07 (pp. 21–30). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champin, P. -A., Priè,Y., & Mille, A. (2003). MUSETTE: Modeling uses and tasks for tracing experience. In K. Ashley & D. G. Bridge (Eds.), Case-based Reasoning Research and Development: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR 2003 (pp. 279–286). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, C., & Iksal, S. (2006). Usage tracking language: A meta-language for modeling tracks in TEL systems. In: J. Filipe, M. Helfert & B. Shishkov (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, ICSOFT’06 (pp. 133–138). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, C., & Iksal, S. (2007). Modeling tracks for the model driven reengineering of a TEL system. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18, 161–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A., & Anderson, J. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, J., Kemp,E., & Todd, E. G. (2005). Managing UI pattern collections. In B. Plimmer & R. Amor (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand Chapter’s International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Making CHI Natural (pp. 31–38). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMS-LD (2007). Learning design specification. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.html.

  • Jermann, P., Soller,A., & Mühlenbrock, M. (2001). From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. In: P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the first European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 324–331). Maastricht, The Netherlands: University of Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy, K., & Levene, M. (2004). A taxonomy of trails of learning objects. In J. Schoonenboom, M. Turcsànyi-Szabò, P. Kaszàs, Z. Pluhàr, A. Jones, C. Blake et al. (Eds.), Trails of digital and non-digital LOs. (pp. 97–106) (Tech. Rep. No. D-21-01-01). [n.p.]: Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://www.dcs.bbk.ac.uk/trails/docs/ D22-02-01-F.pdf

  • Laflaquiére, J., Settouti,L. S., Priè,Y., & Mille, A. (2006). Trace-based system framework for experience management and engineering. In G. Bogdan, J. H. Robert, & C. J. Lakhmi (Eds.), Knowledge-based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems: Proceeding of the 10th international conference, KES 2006 (pp. 1171–1178). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOM (2007). IEEE standards association. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://www.ieee.org/web/standards/home/index.html.

  • Marty, J. C., Hèraud,J. -M., France,L., & Carron, T. (2007). Matching the performed activity on an educational platform with a recommended pedagogical scenario: A multi source approach. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18, 267–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meszaros, G., & Doble, J. (1997). A pattern language for pattern writing. In R. C. Martin, D. Riehle, F. Buschmann (Eds.), Pattern languages of program design 3 (pp. 529–574). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostow, J. (2004). Some useful design tactics for mining ITS data. In: J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Proceedings of the Analysing Student-Tutor Interaction Logs to Improve Educational Outcomes Workshop, ITS’ 04 (pp. 20–28). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostow, J., & Beck, J. (2006). Some useful tactics to modify, map and mine data from intelligent tutors. Natural Language Engineering, 12, 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D., & Levene, M. (2003). Trail records and navigational learning. London Review of Education, 1, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonenboom, J., Levene,M., Heller,J., Keenoy,K., & Turcsànyi-Szabò, M. (2007). Trails in education: Technologies that support navigational learning. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCORM (2007). SCORM 2004 (3rd edn.). Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http:// www.adlnet.gov/scorm/index.cfm.

  • Turcsànyi-Szabò, M., Kaszàs,P., & Pluhàr, Z. (2004). Adaptive navigation support. In J. Schoonenboom, M. Turcsànyi-Szabò, P. Kaszàs, Z. Pluhàr, A. Jones, C. Blake et al. (Eds.), Trails of digital and non-digital LOs. (pp. 25–55) (Tech. Rep. No. D-21-01-01). [n.p.]: Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http:// www.dcs.bbk.ac.uk/ trails/docs/D22-02-01-F.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Choquet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Choquet, C., Iksal, S., Levene, M., Schoonenboom, J. (2009). Users’ Data. In: Balacheff, N., Ludvigsen, S., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A., Barnes, S. (eds) Technology-Enhanced Learning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics