After the mid-1990s, the World Bank, the UK, and some other donor countries and agencies undertook a policy change from structural adjustment initiatives based on the neoliberalism of the 1980s to placing poverty reduction in developing countries at the top of the agenda. To achieve this goal, the developing countries' governance had to be strengthened and the best route to the creation of good governance needed to be explored. This switch in policy encouraged the emergence of a poverty reduction framework which placed emphasis both on developing countries' “ownership” of the development process and on greater collaboration among donor countries/ agencies in allocating and administering aid.
Regarding aid modalities, the conventional cost–benefit/effective approach that was based on the “production function model” which used efficiency as the chief criterion divulged certain limitations. Thus, under the poverty reduction regime with the aim of realizing good governance, conventional project-type aid decreased and was increasingly replaced by general or sector budget support. Support for sector programs, using the sector-wide approach (SWAp), also increased with the explicit goal of reducing poverty, and often included a sectoral focus on education or health.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Buchanan, J. and Tullock, G. (1999). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
Buchert, L. (2000). “From Project to Programme to Sector-Wide Support: Some Questions and Concerns. Prospect, XXX(4): 405–408.
Caillods, F. and Hallak, J. (2004). Education & PRSPs: A Review of Experiences. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Command for Her Majesty (2000). Eliminating World Poverty: Making Globalization Work for the Poor (White Paper on International Development). London: Command for Her Majesty.
Command for Her Majesty (2006). Eliminating World Poverty: Making Governance Work for the Poor (White Paper on International Development). London: Command for Her Majesty.
Department for International Development (DFID). (2004). Poverty Reduction Budget Support: A DFID Policy Paper. London: DFID.
Kitamura, Y. (2007). “The Political Dimension of International Cooperation in Education: Mechanisms of Global Governance to Promote Education for All.” In D.P. Baker and A.W. Wiseman (eds.), Education for All: Global Promises, National Challenges. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, pp. 33–74.
Harold, P. and Associates. (1995). The Broad Sector Approach to Investment Lending: Sector Investment Programs. Washington, D.C. The World Bank, Africa Technical Department Series, World Bank Discussion Paper No. 302.
Hirosato, Y. (2001). “New Challenges for Educational Development and Cooperation in Asia and the Pacific.” Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 4(2): 1–24.
Hirosato, Y. (2005). “A Review Essay of Educational Development Study in Japan: Past, Present and Future Prospects.” Journal of International Development Studies, 14(1): 91–105 (in Japanese).
Hirosato, Y. and Hayashida, K. (2006). “An Exploration on the Political Economy of Educational Development in Developing Countries: Towards a Conceptual Model Building for “Indigenization” of Educational Development.” Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 9(2): 37–48 (in Japanese).
OECD/DAC (1996). Shaping the 21 st Century: The Contribution of Development Cooperation. Paris: OECD/DAC.
Riddell, A.R. (1999). “The Need for a Multidisciplinary Framework for Analyzing Educational Reform in Developing Countries.” International Journal of Educational Development, 19(3): 207–217.
Samoff, J. (ed.) (1995). Coping with Crisis: Austerity, Adjustment and Human Resources. London: Cassell.
Sen, A. (2000). Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
Stiglitz, J. (1993). Principles of Micro Economics. New York: Norton & Company, Inc.
Stiglitz, J. (1998). Towards a New Paradigm for Development: Strategies, Policies, and Processes. The 1998 Prebisch Lecture at UNCTAD, October 19.
UNESCO (2000). The Dakar Framework for Action – Education for All: Meeting our collective Commitments. Paris: UNESCO.
Warrener, D. (2004). Current Thinking in the UK on General Budget Support. London: Overseas Development Institute (ODI Synthesis Paper 4).
Williams, J.H. and Cummings, W.K. (2005). Policy-Making for Education Reform in Developing Countries: Contexts and Processes, Volume 1. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
World Bank (1988). Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Policies for Adjustment, Revitalization, and Expansion. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hirosato, Y. (2009). A Conceptual Model for “Indigenizing” Education Reforms and Capacity Development in Developing Countries. In: Hirosato, Y., Kitamura, Y. (eds) The Political Economy of Educational Reforms and Capacity Development in Southeast Asia. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9377-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9377-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9375-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9377-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)