Skip to main content

Pay Systems, Authority and Conflict

  • Chapter
The Hidden Meaning of Pay Conflict

Abstract

Conflict, as it is normally understood, involves intentionally hostile action. In linking pay attitudes to pay conflict, therefore, one has to show how attitudes can lead to the formation of hostile intentions. In Chapter 2, however, I argued that there was no logical or psychological basis for linking attitudes-to-objects (e.g. to pay) with attitudes-to-future-actions (e.g. intentions) whether hostile or otherwise. The link between the two can only be a substantive one, arising from the social meaning of the situation which underlies both types of attitude. Thus a theory linking pay attitudes to conflict is not a special kind of attitude theory, but a sociological theory of conflictful situations which happen to involve pay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Crozier, M., The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (Tavistock, London, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parsons, T., Introduction to: Weber, M., The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation (Free Press, New York, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weber, op. cit., p. 248 and elsewhere.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dahrendorf, R., Class and Class Conflict in an Industrial Society (Routledge&Kegan Paul, London, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  5. The concepts used in this argument are Weber’s—Weber, M., op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crozier, M., op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Behrend, H., ‘Financial Incentives as the Expression of a System of Beliefs’, British Journal of Sociology; 1959, 10, 137–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roy, D., quoted in Whyte, W. F., Money and Motivation (Harper&Row, New York, 1955) (see p. 59 ff).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1981 Michael White

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, M. (1981). Pay Systems, Authority and Conflict. In: The Hidden Meaning of Pay Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04734-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics