Business Ethics and Self-Initiated Expatriates
This detailed case study is of the results of cultural differences between a member of a highly individualistic culture – that of the US – and representatives of a particularly collectivist section of Colombian society – the Department of Antioquia. According to Hofstede’s1 “6-D” model, US mainstream culture ranks 91 for individualism in contrast to that of Columbia’s ranking of 13.2
KeywordsBusiness Ethic Ethical Reasoning Power Distance Council Member Ethical Belief
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- N. Adler, 1997, International dimensions of organizational behavior, 3rd edition (Cincinnati, OH: South Western College Publishing).Google Scholar
- DANE-Departamento Nacional de Estadísticas, 2014, http://www.dane.gov.co/.
- C. Hampden-Turner and F. Trompenaars, 1993, The seven cultures of capitalism (New York: Currency Press: Doubleday).Google Scholar
- Hofstede Center, 2014, “Cultural tools,” http://geert-hofstede.com/colombia. html.
- G. Hofstede, 1980, Cultures consequences: international differences in work related values (Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
- G. Hofstede, 1991, Cultures and organizations: software of the mind (London: McGraw Hill).Google Scholar
- B.W. Husted, J.B. Dozier, J.T. McMahon and M.W. Kattan, 1996, “The impact of cross-national carriers of business ethics on attitudes about questionable practices and form of moral reasoning,” Journal of International Business Studies, 27(2) (2nd Qtr.), 391–411; Palgrave Macmillan Journals.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- T. Jones, 1991, “Ethical decision-making by individuals in organization: an issue-contingent model,” Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
- J.R. Rest, 1986, Moral development: advances in research and theory (New York: Praeger).Google Scholar