Abstract
Generative metaphors have a capacity to underpin the discourses and methodologies associated with the planning and development of information systems. A number of systemic metaphors are described here. These range from traditional viable systems models to those that can accommodate a multiplicity of interests and relationships, encompassing mutuality and collectivity as well as domination and conflict. The role of such metaphors in framing information systems development and its relationship to human behaviors within organizations, in this case of healthcare, are explored using a case study. The paper speculates on how systemic metaphor may underpin integrated development in which the objective is to bring about technological and human change simultaneously.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, C. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
Atkinson, C. J. “Interventions in the Domain of the Mundane,” presentation to the Judge Institute IS Forum Seminar Series, University of Cambridge, May 16, 2002a. Available from http://wwvv.jims.cam.ac.uk/research/seminar/seminar_fhtml.
Atkinson, C. J. Metaphor and Systemic Praxis, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Lancaster University, 1984.
Atkinson, C. J. “The Multidimensional Systemic Representation of Actor Networks: Modeling Breast Cancer Treatment Decision-Making,” in Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference of Systems Science, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2002b.
Atkinson, C. J. “The `Soft Information Systems and Technologies Methodology’ (SISTeM): An Actor Network Contingency Approach to Integrated Development,” European Journal of Information Systems (9), 2000, pp. 104–123.
Atkinson, C. J. “Soft Information Systems and Technologies Methodology, SISTeM: A Case Study of the Electronic Patient Record,” Requirements Engineering (2), 1997, pp. 1–22.
Atkinson, C. J., and Checkland, P. B. “Extending the Metaphor System,” Human Relations, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (41: 10 ), 1988, pp. 709–725.
Atkinson, C. J., and Dunlop, E. A Scoping Study of the Maturation Pathway for the CCSIS Information System. Reading: Internal Document, 1998.
Bennett, S., Skelton, J., and Lunns, K. Schaums Outlines: UML. New York: Schaums, 2001.
Callon, M. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen,” in J. Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge and Keegan Paul, 1986.
Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1981.
Checkland, P., and Holwell, S. Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1997.
DoH. “The New NHS, Modern, Dependable,” White Paper, Department of Health. London: HMSO, 1997.
Executive. Information for Health: An Information Strategyfor the Modern NHS 1998–2005: A National Strategy for Local Implementation,. National Health Service, London: HMSO, 1998.
Introna, L. Management Information Systems and Power. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan, 1997.
Jones, M. “Information Systems and the Double Mangle: Steering a Course Through the Scylla of Embbed Structure and the Charybdis of Strong Symmetry,” in T. Larson, L. Levine, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Information Systems: Current Issues and Future Changes. Laxenburg, Austria: IFIP Press, 1999, pp. 287–302. (Available from http://is.lse.ac.uk/helsinki/ jones.pdf.)
Jones, M. “Structuration Theory,” in W. L. Currie and R. Galliers (eds.), Rethinking Management Information Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Judge, A. “Metaphors as Transdisciplinary Vehicles ofthe Future,” presentation at the Conference on Science and Tradition: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on the Way to the 21st Century, Paris, December 1991.
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Latour, B. Science in Action. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1987.
Latour, B. “Technology is Society Made Durable,” in J. Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Sociological Review Monograph. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul, 1991, pp. 103–131.
Latour, B. “Where Are the Missing Masses: The Sociology of Mundane Artefacts,” in W. E. Bijerker and J. Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society Cambridge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992, pp. 255–258.
Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J. “Autopoiesis and Cogntion: Realizing of the Living,” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1980.
Schön, D. A. “Generative Metapho: A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social Policy,” in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979, 254–283.
Schön, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
Von Bertalanffy, L. General Systems Theory. New York: George Braziller, 1968.
Walsham, G. “Actor-Network Theory and IS Research: Current Status and Future Prospects,” in A. S. Lee, J. Liebenau, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), Information Systems and Qualitative Research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1997, pp. 466–480.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atkinson, C.J. (2003). The Nature and Role of Generative Systemic Metaphor within Information Systems Planning and Development. In: Wynn, E.H., Whitley, E.A., Myers, M.D., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Global and Organizational Discourse about Information Technology. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 110. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35634-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35634-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5328-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35634-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive