Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nature-Based Treatment Systems for Reclaimed Water Use in Agriculture in Mediterranean Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cost-efficient Wastewater Treatment Technologies

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 117))

Abstract

The Mediterranean region is one of the most vulnerable areas to climate change. This area is affected by severe water scarcity, which is expected to prevail by the upcoming years. The use of reclaimed water (RW) in agriculture is a way to reduce water scarcity, alleviate pressures on groundwater and other freshwater resources, and improve irrigated crop productivity and environmental sustainability. RW is already being used, directly or indirectly, in many semi-arid areas of the world (e.g. Africa, Central America, Southern Europe, and Southern Asia).

In the last decades, Nature-Based Solution (NBS) systems such as constructed wetlands (CWs) or waste stabilization ponds (WSPs) have been proven to be a convenient solution for the decentralized treatment of wastewater (WW) of various origins and for their high landscape integration and low maintenance costs. In particular, NBS systems have rapidly evolved through the use of various design and operational modes or other adjustment (i.e. aeration in subsurface, recirculation rates, etc.) so as to improve effluent water quality with respects to various pollutants removal. Notwithstanding the numerous advantages, several barriers still limit the agricultural RW use practices in both developed and developing countries around the Mediterranean rim. From the technical viewpoint, the poor quality of RW can dissuade farmers from reuse as it could allow only cultivating low revenue crops. A low-cost natural treatment of municipal WW could alleviate restrictions for the agricultural irrigation and save the use of organic and mineral fertilizers.

This chapter reports various aspects linked to the use of RW in agriculture in Mediterranean countries, namely Southern Italy and Nord-African countries. Case studies of the last two decades concerning the RW use in agriculture in South Mediterranean regions were analysed to highlight technical, regulatory, and environmental aspects. Also, use-related risks in agriculture of RW produced by NBS systems in Mediterranean countries are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Collet L, Denis R, Borrell Estupina V et al (2015) Water supply sustainability and adaptation strategies under anthropogenic and climatic changes of a meso-scale Mediterranean catchment. Sci Total Environ 536:589–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. La Jeunesse I, Cirelli C, Aubin D et al (2016) Is climate change a threat for water uses in the Mediterranean region? Results from a survey at local scale. Sci Total Environ 543:981–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. EC (2018) Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council on minimum requirements for water reuse. European Commission, p 337

    Google Scholar 

  4. UNWWDR (2017) UN-world water development report wastewater the untapped resource. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/naturalsciences/environment/water/wwap/wwdr/. Accessed 6 Jun 2018

  5. Cirelli GL, Consoli S, Licciardello F et al (2012) Treated municipal wastewater reuse in vegetable production. Agric Water Manag 104:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pedrero F, Kalavrouziotis I, Alarcón JJ et al (2010) Use of treated municipal wastewater in irrigated agriculture – review of some practices in Spain and Greece. Agric Water Manag 97(9):1233–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. EEA (2009) Water resources across Europe – confronting water scarcity and drought European Environmental Agency report no 2/2009 ISSN 1725-9177

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tran QK, Schwabe KA, Jassby D (2016) Wastewater reuse for agriculture: development of a regional water 356 reuse decision-support model (RWRM) for cost-effective irrigation sources. Environ Sci Technol 50(17):9390–9399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Salgot M, Oron G, Cirelli GL et al (2017) Criteria for wastewater treatment and reuse under water scarcity (chapter 14). In: Handbook of drought and water scarcity: environmental impacts and analysis of drought and water scarcity. CRC Press, New York, pp 263–282

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Alcalde-Sanz L, Gawlik B (2017) Minimum quality requirements for water reuse in agricultural irrigation and aquifer recharge – Towards a water reuse regulatory instrument at EU level RÕÕdition, EUR 28962 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. ISBN 978-92-79-77176-7 (print), 978-92-79-77175-0 (pdf), https://doi.org/10.2760/804116 (online), https://doi.org/10.2760/887727 (print), JRC109291

  11. UE 741 (2020) Regulation on minimum requirements for water reuse

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ait-Mouheb N, Bahri A, Thayer BB et al (2018) The reuse of reclaimed water for irrigation around the Mediterranean Rim: a step towards a more virtuous cycle? Reg Environ Chang 8(3):693–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cirelli GL, Consoli S, Juanicò M (2009) Moelling Escherichia coli concentration in a wastewater reservoir using an operational parameter MRT%FE and first order kinetics. J Environ Manag 90:604–614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bole JB, Bell RG (1978) Land application of municipal sewage wastewater: yield and chemical composition of forage crops. J Environ Qual 7(2):222–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosas I, Báez A, Coutiño M (1984) Bacteriological quality of crops irrigated with wastewater in the Xochimilco plots Mexico city Mexico. Appl Environ Microbiol 47(5):1074–1079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Jaloud A, Hussain G, Al-Saati AJ et al (1993) Effect of wastewaters on plant growth and soil properties. Arid Soil Res Rehabil 7:173–179

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tzanakis VE, Paranychianakis NV, Kyritsis S, Angelakis AN (2003) Wastewater treatment and biomass production by slow rate systems using different plants species. Water Sci Technol 3(4):185–192

    Google Scholar 

  18. Licciardello F, Milani M, Consoli S et al (2018) Wastewater tertiary treatment options to match reuse standards in agriculture. Agric Water Manag 210:232–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pedrero F, Alarc’on JJ (2009) Effects of treated wastewater irrigation on lemon trees. Desalination 246:631–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barbagallo S, Cirelli GL, Consoli S et al (2003) Wastewater quality improvement through storage: a case study in Sicily. Water Sci Technol 47(7-8):169–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamilton AJ, Stagnitti F, Premier R et al (2006) Quantitative microbial risk assessment modelling for the use of reclaimed water in irrigated horticulture. In: Brebbia CA, Popov V, Fayzieva D (eds) The sustainable world series vol 13 environmental health risk III. Wessex Institute of Technology, Ashurst, pp 71–81

    Google Scholar 

  22. Toze S (2006) Reuse of effluent water-benefits and risks. Agric Water Manag 80:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aiello R, Cirelli GL, Consoli S et al (2013) Risk assessment of treated municipal wastewater reuse in Sicily Water. Sci Technol 67(1):89–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Castorina A, Consoli S, Barbagallo S et al (2016) Assessing environmental impacts of constructed wetland effluents for vegetable crop irrigation international. J Phytoremediat 18(6):626–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Merlin G, Pajean JL, Lissolo T (2002) Performances of constructed wetlands for municipal wastewater treatment in rural mountainous area. Hydrobiologia 469:87–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Khalil A, Prudent P, Bettaieb MM et al (2005) Pilot treatment plant: constructed soil reed bed for a cheese dairy farm effluent. In: Book of the internat symp wetland pollutant dynamics and control, Ghent University, Belgium, pp 77–78

    Google Scholar 

  27. Masi F, Bendoricchio G, Conte G et al (2000) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Italy: state-of-the-art and obtained results. In: Proceedings of the 7th IWA international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, Orlando, pp 979–985

    Google Scholar 

  28. Puigagut J, Villaseñor J, Salas JJ et al (2007) Subsurface-flow constructed wetlands in Spain for the sanitation of small communities: a comparative study. Ecol Eng 30:312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cirelli GL, Consoli S, Grande D et al (2007) Subsurface constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in agriculture – five years of experience in Sicily Italy. Water Sci Technol 56(3):183–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rashidi M, Gholami M (2011) Interactive effect of plastic mulch and tillage method on yield, yield components and quality of tomato. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 4:6–12

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gamri S, Soric A, Tomas S et al (2014) Biofilm development in micro-irrigation emitters for wastewater reuse irrigation. Science 32(1):77–85

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hiskakis M, Babou E, Briassoulis D (2011) Experimental processing of biodegradable drip irrigation systems – possibilities and limitations. J Polym Environ 19:887–907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodrìguez C (1990) Evaluacion de instalaciones de microirrigacion IV Curso de Tecnologia del Riego (Evaluation of the microirrigation system IV Course on Irrigation technology) ETSIA Universidad Politecnica de Catalunia Lleida Spain

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pucci B, Masi F, Conte G et al (2004) Linee giuida per la progettazione e gestione di zone umide artificiali per la depurazione dei reflui civili. IRIDRA Srl, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  35. M’hiri F, Kouki MS, Hanchi B (2005) Performance of constructed wetland treating domestic wastewaters in Tunisia: first experience. In: Book of abstracts of the international symposium on wetland pollutant dynamics and control, Ghent University, Belgium, pp 114–115

    Google Scholar 

  36. WHO (1989) Health guidelines for the use of wastewater in agriculture and aquaculture. World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  37. US EPA, Guidelines for Water Reuse AR-1530 EPA/600/R-12/618 (2012) US Environmental Protection Agency National Environmental Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  38. State of California (2001) “The purple book” (excerpts from the health and safety code water code and titles 22 and 17 of the California Code of Regulations). Department of Health Services, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bixio D, Thoeye C, Wintgens T et al (2008) Water reclamation and reuse: implementation and management issues. Desalination 218:13–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. WHO (2006) Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater excreta and greywater. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bastian R, Murray D (2012) Guidelines for water reuse US EPA Office of Research and Development Washington DC EPA/600/R-12/618 2012

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hernandez V, Bellver-Domingo Á, Hernández-Sancho F (2018) Efficiency of wastewater treatment facilities: the influence of scale economies. J Environ Manag 228:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Qadir M, Sato T (2016) Water reuse in arid zones. In: Urban water reuse handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 867–874

    Google Scholar 

  44. WHO (2014) Meeting the MDG drinking water and sanitation target: the urban and rural challenge of the decade. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/monitoring/jmpfinal.pdf. Accessed Aug 2017

  45. Fawell J, Le Corre K, Jeffrey P (2016) Common or independent? The debate over regulations and standards for water reuse in Europe. Int J Water Resour Dev 32:559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ventura D, Barbagallo S, Consoli S et al (2019) On the performance of a pilot hybrid constructed wetland for stormwater recovery in Mediterranean climate. Water Sci Technol 79(6):1051–1059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cirelli GL, Consoli S, Di Grande V (2008) Long term storage of reclaimed water: the case studies in Sicily (Italy). Desalination 218:62–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rossi G, Cirelli GL (2020) Assessment of non-conventional water resources. In: Rossi G, Benedini M (eds) Water resources of Italy. World water resources, vol vol 5. Springer, Cham

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Andersson K, Dickin S, Rosemarin A (2016) Towards “sustainable” sanitation: challenges and opportunities. Urban Areas Sustain 8(12):1289

    Google Scholar 

  50. SuSanA (2018) Towards more sustainable sanitation solutions – sustainable sanitation alliance vision document. http://www.waterandmegacities.org/wastewater-treatment-in-hyderabad/. Accessed 22 May 2018

  51. Salama Y, Chennaoui M, Sylla A et al (2014) Review of wastewater treatment and reuse in the Morocco: aspects and perspectives international. J Environ Pollut Res 2(1):9–25

    Google Scholar 

  52. Collivignarelli C, Abbà A, Benigna I et al (2018) Overview of the main disinfection processes for wastewater and drinking water treatment plants. Sustainability 10:86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mahjoub O, Jemai A, Gharbi N et al (2017) Public acceptance of wastewater use in agriculture: Tunisian experience. In: Hettiarachchi H, Ardakanian R (eds) Safe use of wastewater in agriculture: from concept to implementation. UNU-FLORES. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  54. Baumann DD (1983) Social acceptance of water reuse. Appl Geogr 3:79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Drechsel P, Mahjoub O, Keraita B (2015) Social and cultural dimensions in wastewater use. In: Drechsel P, Qadir M, Wichelns D (eds) Wastewater: an economic asset in an urbanizing world geographical focus: low- and middle-income countries part 3 the enabling environment for use. Springer, pp 75–92

    Google Scholar 

  56. Almuktar SAAAN, Abed SN, Scholz M (2018) Wetlands for wastewater treatment and subsequent recycling of treated effluent: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:23595–23623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Borkar RP, Mahatme PS (2011) Wastewater treatment with vertical flow constructed wetland. Int J Environ Sci 2(2)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Scholz M, Hedmark Å (2010) Constructed wetlands treating runoff contaminated with nutrients. Water Air Soil Pollut 205:323–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0076-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Hammer D (1989) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: municipal industrial and agricultural. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea

    Google Scholar 

  60. Edberg SC, Rice EW, Karlin RJ, Allen MJ (2000) Escherichia Coli: the best biological drinking water Indicator for public health protection. J Appl Microbiol 88:1068–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Khatiwada N, Polprasert C (1999) Kinetics of faecal coliform removal in constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 40(5):109–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Conte G, Matinuzzi N, Giovannelli L, Pucci B, Masi F (2001) Constructed wetlands for wastewater. Water Sci Technol 44 (11-12):339–343. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2001.0849

  63. Noemi R, Moshe A, Gideon O (2004) A pilot study of constructed wetlands using duckweed (Lemna gibba L.) for treatment of domestic primary effluent in Israel. Water Res 38:2241–2248

    Google Scholar 

  64. Liu Y, Imlay JA (2013) Cell death from antibiotics without the involvement of reactive oxygen species. Science 339(6124):1210–1213. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232751

  65. Ha NTH, Sakakibara M, Sano S (2011) Accumulation of Indium and other heavy metals by Eleocharis acicularis: an option for phytoremediation and phytomining. Biores Technol 102:2228–2234

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ventura D, Ferrante M, Copat C, Grasso A, Milani M, Sacco A, Licciardello F, Cirelli GL (2021) Metal removal processes in a pilot hybrid constructed wetland for the treatment of semi-synthetic stormwater. Sci Total Environ 754:142221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. APHA (2005) Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (eds) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater20th edn. American Public Health Association the American Water Works Association and the Water Environment Federation, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ministerial Decree 185 (2003) “Norme tecniche per il riutilizzo delle acque reflue” (“Technical standards for wastewater reuse”) GU n169 del 23-07-2003

    Google Scholar 

  69. Aiello R, Cirelli GL, Consoli S (2007) Effects of reclaimed wastewater irrigation on soil and tomato fruits: a case study in Sicily (Italy). Agric Water Manag 93:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. IWA (2020) Assessment of treatment plant performance and water quality data – a guide for students, researchers and practitioners. Von Sperling M, Verbyla ME, Oliveira SM (eds). IWA Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  71. IWA (2019) Wetland technology: practical information on the design and application of treatment wetlands. In: Langergraber G, Dotro G, Nivala J, Rizzo A, Stein OR (eds). IWA Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781789060171

  72. Kadlec RH, Wallace SD (2009) Treatment wetlands.2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 893

    Google Scholar 

  74. Brix H (1998) Denmark. In: Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Europe, In: Vymazal J, Brix H, Cooper PF, Green MB, Haberl R (eds). Backhuys Publisher, Leiden, p 123

    Google Scholar 

  75. Vymazal J, Kröpfelová L (2011) A three-stage experimental constructed wetland for treatment of domestic sewage: first 2 years of operation. Ecol Eng 37(1):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ávila C, Garfí M, García (2013) Three-stage hybrid constructed wetland system for wastewater treatment and reuse in warm climate regions. Ecol Eng 61A:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Metcalf and Eddy, Inc (1991) Wastewater engineering treatment disposal and reuse.3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  78. Barbagallo S, Cirelli GL, Marzo A et al (2013) Effect of different plant species in pilot constructed wetlands for wastewater reuse in agriculture. J Agric Eng 44:796–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Marzo A, Ventura D, Cirelli GL et al (2018) Hydraulic reliability of a horizontal wetland for wastewater treatment in Sicily. Sci Total Environ 636:94–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Legislative Decree 152 (2006) “Norme in materia ambientale” (“Standards on the environment”) GU n 88 del 14 aprile 2006 - Supplemento Ordinario n 96

    Google Scholar 

  81. Vymazal J (2018) Does clogging affect long-term removal of organics and suspended solids in gravel-based horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands? Chem Eng J 331:663–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Catania, Catania, Italy

    Feliciana Licciardello, Delia Ventura, Salvatore Barbagallo & Giuseppe L. Cirelli

  2. Institut National de Recherche en Génie Rural, Eaux et Forêts, Ariana/Nabeul, Tunisia

    Olfa Mahjoub

  3. Centre de Recherches et des Technologies des Eaux, Nabeul, Tunisia

    Hamadi Kallali

  4. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie, Ariana, Tunisia

    Annabi Mohamed

Authors
  1. Feliciana Licciardello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olfa Mahjoub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Delia Ventura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hamadi Kallali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Annabi Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Salvatore Barbagallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Giuseppe L. Cirelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feliciana Licciardello .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Engineering Department, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), Alexandria, Egypt

    Mahmoud Nasr

  2. Water and Water Structures Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Abdelazim M. Negm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Licciardello, F. et al. (2021). Nature-Based Treatment Systems for Reclaimed Water Use in Agriculture in Mediterranean Countries. In: Nasr, M., Negm, A.M. (eds) Cost-efficient Wastewater Treatment Technologies. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 117. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2021_783

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation