Advertisement

AGD: A course engineering support system

  • Gilbert Paquette
  • Jean Girard
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1086)

Abstract

AGD is a performance support system for content expert involved in educational design. It puts a strong emphasis on strategic Instructional design knowledge that help in the decisions that the designers must make to achieve a learning system. This knowledge is embedded in an advisor system, while the conceptual (design objects to produce) and the procedural (how to produce it) ID knowledge is embedded in a comprehensive and integrated task support system.

We will first describe briefly the task support system (AGD). Then we will concentrate on its companion advisor system, presenting the methodology we have developed to add an advisor to the AGD task support system. We will also give an overview of some generic tools that were developed to facilitate the development of such an advisor. Finally, we will discuss different aspects of the approach such as level the of abstraction in the advisor system, the diversity of point of views made possible, generality and productivity issues and finally future developments that we intend to achieve.

Keywords

Instructional Design Tools Advisors systems Task support systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Gery, 1991]
    Gery G. Electronic Performance Support Systems, Weingarten, Boston, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. [Gustafson, 1993]
    Gustafson K.L. Instructional Transaction Fundamentals: Clouds on the Horizon, Educational Technology, February 1993, pp 27–32Google Scholar
  3. [Merrill 1994]
    D. Merrill. Principles of Instructional Design. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 465 pages.Google Scholar
  4. [Merrill, 1992]
    Merrill M.D., Li Z., Jones M.K., Instructional Transaction Shells: Responsibilities, Methods, and Parameters, Educational Technology, February 1992, pp 5–26 [Minsky, 1975]Google Scholar
  5. [Paquette,1994]
    G. Paquette, F. Crevier et C. Aubin ID Knowledge in a Course Design Workbench. Educational Technology, USA, volume 34, n. 9, pp. 50–57, November 1994Google Scholar
  6. [Paquette, 1993]
    Paquette, G. Un système de modélisation cognitive et métacognitive. pour l'ingénierie didacttique Notes de recherches du LICEF, Novembre 1993.Google Scholar
  7. [Paris, 1983]
    S. Paris, M.Y. Lipson, & K.K. Wixson. Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316Google Scholar
  8. [Pirolli, 1990]
    Pirolli P., Russell D.M., The Instructional Design Environment: Technology to support design problem solving. Instructional Science 19, 1990, pp 121–144.Google Scholar
  9. [Reigeluth, 1987]
    Reigeluth, C. Instructional Theories in Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories and Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. [Romizowski, 1981]
    Romizowski, A.J. Designing Instructional Systems. Nichols Publ., NY: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  11. [Spector, 1993]
    Spector, M. Polson, M. Muraida, D. Automating Instructional Design. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jerseay, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. [Tennyson, 1988]
    Tennyson, R. Linking cognitive learning theory to instructional prescriptions, Instructional Science, vol. 17, 369–385.Google Scholar
  13. [Winograd 1985]
    T. Winograd. Beyond the declarative/procedural controversy, in R. J. Brachman & H. J. Lévesque (Eds), Readings in Knowledge Representation. Morgan Kaufmann PublishersGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert Paquette
    • 1
  • Jean Girard
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre de recherche LICEFTélé-universitéMontréal

Personalised recommendations