Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Protraction Facial Mask for the Correction of Midfacial Retrusion: The Bergen Rationale

  • Chapter
Cleft Lip and Palate

  • 3573 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 569.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stricker G, Clifford E, Cohen LK, Giddon DB, Meskin LH, Evans, CA. Psychosocial aspects of craniofacial disfigurement. A “state of the art” assessment conducted by the Craniofacial Anomalies Program Branch, The National Institute of Dental Research. Am J Orthod 1979; 76:410–422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981; 79:399–415.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles CR. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod 1985; 87:21–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alsaker FD, Olweus D. Assessment of global negative self-evaluations and perceived stability of self in Norwegian preadolescents and adolescents. J Early Adolesc 1986; 6:269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alsaker FD. Global negative self-evaluations in early adolescence. Bergen, Norway: Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen; 1990. Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Semb G, Shaw WC. Quality control in cleft lip and palate orthodontics — less treatment is better treatment? 7th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies. Broadbeach, Australia; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 7: An overview of treatment and facial growth. Cleft Palate J 1987; 24:71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Semb G. A study of facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP team. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991a; 28:1–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tindlund RS, Rygh P, Bøe OE. Orthopedic protraction of the upper jaw in cleft lip and palate patients during the deciduous and mixed dentition periods in comparison with normal growth and development. In: The 1994 Year Book of Dentistry. Chicago: Mosby-Year Book; 1994. p. 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tindlund RS, Rygh P, Bøe OE. Orthopedic protraction of the upper jaw in cleft lip and palate patients during the deciduous and mixed dentition periods in comparison with normal growth and development. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993a; 30:182–194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tindlund RS, Rygh P. Maxillary protraction: Different effects on facial morphology in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993a; 30:208–221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Semb G. A study of facial growth in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP team. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991b; 28:22–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rygh P, Tindlund RS. Orthopaedic expansion and protraction of the maxilla in cleft palate patients-A new treatment rationale. Cleft Palate J 1982; 19:104–112.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tindlund RS. Behandling av leppe/kjeve/ganespalte i Bergen — Teamwork. Nor Tannlegeforen Tid 1987: 97:360–369.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tindlund RS. Orthopaedic protraction of the midface in the deciduous dentition-Results covering 3 years out of treatment. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1989; 17(Suppl.1):17–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tindlund RS. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before the age 10 years. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994a; 31: July.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tindlund RS. Prediction of sagittal skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before the age 10 years. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994b; 31:295–308.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tindlund RS, Rygh P, Bøe OE. Intercanine widening and sagittal effect of maxillary transverse expansion in patients with cleft lip and palate during the deciduous and mixed dentitions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993b; 30:195–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tindlund RS, Rygh P. Soft-tissue profile changes during widening and protraction of the maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate compared with normal growth and development. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993b; 30:454–468.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Guyer EC, Ellis EE, McNamara JA, Behrents RG. Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod 1986; 56:7–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thilander, B. Chin-cap treatment for Angle Class III malocclusion. Eur Orthod Soc Report 1965; 41:311–327.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Delaire J, Verdon P, Lumineau J-P, Cherga-Négréa A, Talmant J, Boisson M. Quelques résultats des tractions extraorales à appui fronto-mentonnier dans le traitement orthopédique des malformations maxillo-mandibulaires de classe III et des séquelles osseuses des fentes labio-maxillaires. Rev Stomatol 1972; 73:633–642.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Delaire J, Verdon P, Flour J. Ziele und Ergebnisse extraoraler Züge in postero-anteriorer Richtung in Anwendung einer orthopädischen Maske bei der Behandlung von Fällen der Klasse III. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1976; 37:247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Graber LW. Chin cup therapy for mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1977; 72:23–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ishii H, Morita S, Takeuchi Y, Nakamura, S. Treatment effect of combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in severe skeletal Class III cases. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987; 92:304–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tweed CH. Clinical Orthodontics. Vol. 2. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vego L. Early orthopedic treatment for Class III skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod 1976; 70:59–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ruhland A. The correlation between Angle Cl. III malocclusion and facial structures as diagnostic factors. Eur Orthod Soc Trans 1975:229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schulhof RJ, Nakamura S, Williamson WV. Prediction of abnormal growth in Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1977; 71:421–430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Campbell PM. The dilemma of Class III treatment: early or late? Angle Orthod 1983; 53:175–191.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Linder-Aronson S, Aschan G. Nasal resistance to breathing and palatal height before and after expansion of the median palatine suture. Odontol Revy 1963; 14:254–270.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Harvold EP, Chierici, G, Vargervik K. Experiments on the development of dental malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1972; 61:38–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Harvold EP, Vargervik K, Chierici G. Primate experiments on oral sensation and dental malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1973; 63:496–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Haas AJ. Rapid palatal expansion: a recommended prerequisite to Class III treatment. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1973; 49:311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ohkiba T, Hanada K. Adaptive functional changes in the swallowing pattern of the tongue following expansion of the maxillary dental arch in subjects with and without cleft palate. Cleft Palate J 1989; 26:21–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Harvold E. Cleft lip and palate: morphologic studies on the facial skeleton. Am J Orthod 1954; 40:493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Subtelny JD. The importance of early orthodontic treatment in cleft palate planning. Angle Orthod 1957; 27:148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ogidan O, Subtelny JD. Eruption of incisor teeth in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1983; 20:331–341.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. American cleft palate-craniofacial association. Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/ palate or other craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993; 30(Suppl 1).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bergland O, Semb G, Åbyholm FE. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J 1986; 23:175–205.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Schjelderup H, Johnson GE. A six-year follow-up study of 155 children with cleft lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg 1983; 36:154–161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hermanson H, Kurol J, Rönnerman A: Treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite with quad-helix and removable plates. A retrospective study. Eur J Orthod 1985; 7:97–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Björk A. The use of metallic implants in the study of facial growth in children. Method and application. Am J Orthod 1968; 29:243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Melsen B. The cranial base. the postnatal development of the cranial base studied histologically on human autopsy material. Acta Odont Scand 32, Suppl 62, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Melsen B, Melsen F. The postnatal development of the palatomaxillary region studied on human autopsy material. Am J Orthod 1982; 82:329–342.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Buschang PH, Porter C, Genecov E, Genecov D, Sayler KE. Face mask therapy of preadolescents with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Angle Orthod 1994; 64:145–150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rygh R, Tindlund RS. Early considerations in the orthodontic management of skeletodental discrepancies and long term results. In: Facial Clefts and Craniosynostosis: Principles and management. Eds: Timothy A. Turvey, Kathrine W.L. Vig, Raymond J. Fonseca. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Segner D. Correlating cephalometric measurements and esthetic ratings of the profile in patients displaying clefts of the lip, alveolus and palate. Kieferorthop Mitteilungen 1992; 4:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Tindlund Rolf S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. American Board of Orthodontics Maxillo-Mandibular Reconstruction, Cranio Facial Orthopedics The Professional Center - Suite 112, 6601 S.W. 80 St., South Miami, FL, 33143, USA

    Samuel Berkowitz DDS, MS, FICD (Diplomate) (Diplomate)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rolf S., T. (2006). Protraction Facial Mask for the Correction of Midfacial Retrusion: The Bergen Rationale. In: Berkowitz, S. (eds) Cleft Lip and Palate. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30020-1_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30020-1_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23409-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30020-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation