Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Épidémiologie et conséquences médico-économiques des incontinences urinaires et anales de l’adulte

  • Chapter
Pelvi-périnéologie

  • 641 Accesses

Résumé

La prévalence des incontinences anales et urinaires représente un problème de santé publique en raison de leur retentissement parfois majeur en termes de qualité de vie et du coût financier induit par leur prise en charge. Un à deux tiers des femmes consultant pour incontinence urinaire se disent gênées dans la vie quotidienne. Les troubles de la continence sont souvent un motif d’institutionnalisation des personnes âgées. En France, pour la seule prise en charge de l’incontinence urinaire en 1995, le coût des protections était compris entre 244 et 300 millions d’euros par an dans la population générale, le coût de la prise en charge en institution des personnes âgées incontinentes était de 1,5 milliards d’euros par an, et le surcoût lié à la prise en charge de l’incontinence dans les hôpitaux de court séjour était de 50 millions d’euros par an.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Abramowitz L, Sobhani I, Ganansia R et al. (2000) Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery ? Results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 590–6; discussion 596–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. AHCPR (1996) Agency for health Care Policy and Research: urinary incontinence in adults: acute and chronic management. http://hstat.nlm.nih.gov

    Google Scholar 

  3. AHCPR (1996) Managing acute and chronic urinary incontinence. AHCPR Urinary Incontinence in Adults Guideline Update Panel. Am Fam Physician 54: 1661–72

    Google Scholar 

  4. AHRQ (1996) Managing acute and chronic urinary incontinence. US Department of Health and human services. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 8: 390–403

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amaral SS, Teixeira MG, Brito SL et al. (1997) [Prevalence of fecal incontinence in diabetic patients: epidemiological study of patients assisted as outpatients at the Clinical Hospital of the Medical School at the University of Sao Paulo]. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 52: 295–301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. ANAES (2003) Agence nationale d’accréditation et d’évaluation en santé: Prise en charge de l’incontinence urinaire de la femme en médecine générale. http//www.anaes.fr

    Google Scholar 

  7. ANDEM (1995) Agence nationale pour le développement de l’évaluation médicale: évaluation et état des connaissances concernant l’incontinence urinaire de l’adulte. 159, rue Nationale — 75640 Paris cedex 13

    Google Scholar 

  8. Birnbaum H, Leong S, and Kabra A (2003) Lifetime medical costs for women: cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and stress urinary incontinence. Womens Health Issues 13: 204–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chassagne P, Jego A, Gloc P et al. (2000) Does treatment of constipation improve faecal incontinence in institutionalized elderly patients ? Age Ageing 29: 159–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chassagne P, Landrin I, Neveu C et al. (1999) Fecal incontinence in the institutionalized elderly: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis. Am J Med 106: 185–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen GD, Hu SW, Chen YC et al. (2003) Prevalence and correlations of anal incontinence and constipation in Taiwanese women. Neurourol Urodyn 22: 664–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiarelli P, Brown W, McElduff P (1999) Leaking urine: prevalence and associated factors in Australian women. Neurourol Urodyn 18: 567–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Czernichow P, Manouvrier C, Frenkiel J (1992) [Anal incontinence: a new field of clinical and epidemiological research to invest]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 16: 323–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Damon H, Henry L, Bretones S, Mellier G et al. (2000) Postdelivery anal function in primiparous females: ultrasound and manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 472–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Delechenaut P, Leroi AM, Weber J et al. (1992) Relationship between clinical symptoms of anal incontinence and the results of anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 847–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Delvaux M (2003) Digestive health in the elderly: faecal incontinence in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18Suppl 3: 84–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Denis P, Bercoff E, Bizien MF et al. (1992) [Prevalence of anal incontinence in adults]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 16: 344–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D et al. (1998) Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol 92: 955–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Donnelly VS, O’Herlihy C, Campbell DM et al. (1998) Postpartum fecal incontinence is more common in women with irritable bowel syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 586–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Doran CM, Chiarelli P, Cockburn J (2001) Economic costs of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling Australian women. Med J Aust 174: 456–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzzi E et al. (1993) US householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig Dis Sci 38: 1569–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Enck P, Bielefeldt K, Rathmann W et al. (1991) Epidemiology of faecal incontinence in selected patient groups. Int J Colorectal Dis 6: 143–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fynes M, Donnelly VS, O’Connell PR et al. (1998) Cesarean delivery and anal sphincter injury. Obstet Gynecol 92: 496–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Giebel GD, Lefering R, Troidl H et al. (1998) Prevalence of fecal incontinence: what can be expected ? Int J Colorectal Dis 13: 73–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Green JP, Smoker I, Ho MT et al. (2003) Urinary incontinence in subacute care — a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and costs. Med J Aust 178: 550–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Groutz A, Fait G, Lessing JB et al. (1999) Incidence and obstetric risk factors of postpartum anal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 34: 315–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hinds JP, Eidelman BH, Wald A (1990) Prevalence of bowel dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. A population survey. Gastroenterology 98: 1538–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hojberg KE, Salvig JD, Winslow NA et al. (2000) Flatus and faecal incontinence: prevalence and risk factors at 16 weeks of gestation. Bjog 107: 1097–103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ismael SS, Amarenco G, Bayle B et al. (2000) Postpartum lumbosacral plexopathy limited to autonomic and perineal manifestations: clinical and electrophysiological study of 19 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68: 771–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jackson SL, Weber AM, Hull TL et al. (1997) Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 89: 423–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Johanson JF, Irizarry F, Doughty A (1997) Risk factors for fecal incontinence in a nursing home population. J Clin Gastroenterol 24: 156–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Johanson JF, Lafferty J (1996) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 91: 33–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kalantar JS, Howell S, Talley NJ (2002) Prevalence of faecal incontinence and associated risk factors; an underdiagnosed problem in the Australian community ? Med J Aust 176: 54–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kamm MA (1994) Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence. Lancet 344: 730–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Karoui S, Savoye-Collet C, Koning E et al. (1999) Prevalence of anal sphincter defects revealed by sonography in 335 incontinent patients and 115 continent patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173: 389–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Khubchandani IT, Reed JF (1989) Sequelae of internal sphincterotomy for chronic fissure in ano. Br J Surg 76: 431–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Khullar V, Damiano R, Toozs-Hobson P et al. (1998) Prevalence of faecal incontinence among women with urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105: 1211–3

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lal M, C HM, Callender R et al. (2003) Does cesarean delivery prevent anal incontinence ? Obstet Gynecol 101: 305–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Leight RJ TL (1982) Faecal incontinence: the unvoiced symptom. The Lancet 1: 1349–51

    Google Scholar 

  40. Leroi AM, Brunat T, Berkelmans I et al. (1993) [Multivariate analysis of clinical signs, parameters of anorectal manometry, defecography, transit time of radiopaque markers in 76 patients complaining of fecal incontinence]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 17: 116–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Leroi AM, Weber J, Menard JF et al. (1999) Prevalence of anal incontinence in 409 patients investigated for stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 18: 579–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Longstreth GF (1993) Bowel patterns and anxiety. Demographic factors. J Clin Gastroenterol 17: 128–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. MacArthur C, Bick DE, Keighley MR (1997) Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104: 46–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Malouf AJ, Chambers MG, Kamm MA (2001) Clinical and economic evaluation of surgical treatments for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 88: 1029–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mellgren A, Jensen LL, Zetterstrom JP et al. (1999) Long-term cost of fecal incontinence secondary to obstetric injuries. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 857–65; discussion 865–857

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Miner PB, Jr (2004) Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology 126: S8–S13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Moore KH (2001) The costs of urinary incontinence. Med J Aust 174: 436–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Pedersen PM et al. (1997) Prevalence and risk factors of incontinence after stroke. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 28: 58–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E et al. (1995) Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. Jama 274: 559–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nelson RL (2004) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126: S3–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Oberwalder M, Connor J, Wexner SD (2003) Metaanalysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg 90: 1333–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C et al. (2002) Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 50: 480–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Peschers UM, Sultan AH, Jundt K et al. (2003) Urinary and anal incontinence after vacuum delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 110: 39–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. RCP (1995) Incontinence. Causes, management and provision of services. A Working Party of the Royal College of Physicians. J R Coll Physicians Lond 29: 272–4

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS et al. (2003) Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 348: 900–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Roy S (1997) The cost of continence. Elder Care 9: 3–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ryhammer AM, Bek KM, Laurberg S (1995) Multiple vaginal deliveries increase the risk of permanent incontinence of flatus urine in normal premenopausal women. Dis Colon Rectum 38: 1206–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Samuelsson E, Mansson L, Milsom I (2001) Incontinence aids in Sweden: users and costs. BJU Int 88: 893–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Schnelle JF, Leung FW (2004) Urinary and fecal incontinence in nursing homes. Gastroenterology 126: S41–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sultan AH, Kamm MA (1997) Faecal incontinence after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104: 979–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN et al. (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329: 1905–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Talley NJ, O’Keefe EA, Zinsmeister AR et al. (1992) Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 102: 895–901

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Tediosi F, Parazzini F, Bortolotti A et al. (2000) The cost of urinary incontinence in Italian women. A cross-sectional study. Gruppo di Studio Incontinenza. Pharmacoeconomics 17: 71–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Tobin GW and Brocklehurst JC (1986) Faecal incontinence in residential homes for the elderly: prevalence, aetiology and management. Age Ageing 15: 41–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Van Tets WF, Kuijpers HC (1994) Continence disorders after anal fistulotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 1194–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Wagner TH, Hu TW (1998) Economic costs of urinary incontinence in 1995. Urology 51: 355–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Wilson L, Brown JS, Shin GP et al. (2001) Annual direct cost of urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 98: 398–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zetterstrom J, Lopez A, Holmstrom B et al. (2003) Obstetric sphincter tears and anal incontinence: an observational follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82: 921–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Zetterstrom JP, Lopez A, Anzen B et al. (1999) Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a prospective study in primiparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106: 324–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de pathologie digestive et urinaire, CHU de Rouen, Hôpital Charles-Nicolle, 1, rue de Germont, 76031, Rouen Cedex

    Ph. Denis

Authors
  1. Ph. Denis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Denis, P. (2005). Épidémiologie et conséquences médico-économiques des incontinences urinaires et anales de l’adulte. In: Pelvi-périnéologie. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-27807-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-27807-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-00501-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-27807-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation