Model-Driven Dynamic Control of Embedded Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Paul G. Flikkema
  • Pankaj K. Agarwal
  • James S. Clark
  • Carla Ellis
  • Alan Gelfand
  • Kamesh Munagala
  • Jun Yang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3993)


Next-generation wireless sensor networks may revolutionize understanding of environmental change by assimilating heterogeneous data, assessing the relative value and costs of data collection, and scheduling activities accordingly. Thus, they are dynamic, data-driven distributed systems that integrate sensing with modeling and prediction in an adaptive framework. Integration of a range of technologies will allow estimation of the value of future data in terms of its contribution to understanding and cost. This balance is especially important for environmental data, where sampling intervals will range from meters and seconds to landscapes and years. In this paper, we first describe a general framework for dynamic data-driven wireless network control that combines modeling of the sensor network and its embedding environment, both in and out of the network. We then describe a range of challenges that must be addressed, and an integrated suite of solutions for the design of dynamic sensor networks.


Sensor Node Wireless Sensor Network Medium Access Control Battery Lifetime Sensor Network Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Agarwal, P.K., Guibas, L.J., et al.: Algorithmic issues in modeling motion. ACM Comput. Surv. 24, 550–572 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chakraborty, S., Agarwal, P.K., Clark, J.: The gap light model, manuscript (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark, J.S., et al.: Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. Science 293, 657–660 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clark, J.S.: Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecol. Lett. 8, 2–14 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flikkema, P., West, B.: Clique-Based Randomised Multiple Access for Energy-Efficient Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In: Proc. 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC 2003), New Orleans (March 2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flikkema, P.: The precision and energetic cost of snapshot estimates in wireless sensor networks (2006) (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goel, A., Guha, S., Munagala, K.: Asking the right questions: Model-driven optimization using probes (2006) (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Govindrajan, S., Dietze, M., Agarwal, P.K., Clark, J.: A scalable simulator for forest dynamics. In: Proc. 20th Sympos. Comput. Geom. (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Govindrajan, S., Dietze, M., Agarwal, P.K., Clark, J.: A scalable algorithm for dispersing population. J. Intelligent Information Systems (in press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar, V. (ed.): Special Section on Sensor Network Technology and Sensor Data Management (Part I). SIGMOD Record 32(4) (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silberstein, A., Braynard, R., Ellis, C., Munagala, K., Yang, J.: A sampling-based approach to optimizing top-k queries in sensor networks. In: Proc. of the 22nd Intl. Conf. on Data Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silberstein, A., Braynard, R., Yang, J.: Constraint-chaining: on energy-efficient continuous monitoring in sensor networks. In: Proc. of the 22nd Intl. Conf. on Data Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silberstein, A., Munagala, K., Yang, J.: Energy efficient monitoring of extreme values in sensor networks (2006) (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith, A.F.M., Gelfand, A.E.: Bayesian statistics without tears: a sampling-resampling perspective. American Statistician 46, 84–88 (1992)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang, Z., et al.: WiSARDNet: A system solution for high performance in situ environmental monitoring. In: 2nd International Workshop on Networked Sensor Systems (INSS 2005), San Diego (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zeng, H., Ellis, C.S., Lebeck, A.R., Vahdat, A.: Ecosystem: Managing energy as a first class operating system resource. In: Proc. Tenth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS X), October 2002, pp. 123–132 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zeng, H., Ellis, C.S., Lebeck, A.R., Vahdat, A.: Currentcy: A unifying abstraction for expressing energy. In: Usenix Annual Technical Conference, June 2003, pp. 43–56 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul G. Flikkema
    • 1
  • Pankaj K. Agarwal
    • 2
  • James S. Clark
    • 2
  • Carla Ellis
    • 2
  • Alan Gelfand
    • 2
  • Kamesh Munagala
    • 2
  • Jun Yang
    • 2
  1. 1.Northern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA
  2. 2.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations