Skip to main content

The Identification and Control of a Finger Exoskeleton for Grasping Rehabilitation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Manufacturing & Mechatronics

Abstract

This paper evaluates the efficacy of different classical control architectures in performing grasping motion. The exoskeleton system was obtained via system identification method in which the input and output data was measured by means of current sensor (ACS712) and encoder attached to a DC geared motor (SPG30e-270k). The data obtained is split with a ratio of 70:30 for estimation and validation, respectively. The transfer function of the system is evaluated by varying the number of poles and zeros that are able to fit well with validation data. The performance of the classical P, PI, PD and PID control techniques were then evaluated in its ability to track the desired trajectory. It was demonstrated from the study that the PID controller provides the least steady state error as well as a reasonably fast settling time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hansen, T.B., Carstensen, O.: Hand injuries in agricultural accidents. J. Hand Surg. Am. 24, 190–192 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hasegawa, Y., Mikami, Y., Watanabe, K., Firouzimehr, Z., Sankai, Y.: Wearable handling support system for paralyzed patient. In: 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS, pp. 741–746 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, J.F., Yang, C.J., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Dong, Y.M.: Modeling and control of a curved pneumatic muscle actuator for wearable elbow exoskeleton. Mechatronics 18, 448–457 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Loureiro, R., Amirabdollahian, F., Topping, M., Driessen, B., Harwin, W.: Upper limb robot mediated stroke therapy—GENTLE/s approach. Auton. Robots. 15, 35–51 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Murphy, T.H., Corbett, D.: Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 861–872 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Masiero, S., Armani, M., Rosati, G.: Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: Focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 48, 355–366 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rey, G., Donnan, A., Fisher, M., Macleod, M., Davis, S.M.: Stroke. Lancet 371, 1612–1623 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Basteris, A., Nijenhuis, S.M., Stienen, A.H., Buurke, J.H., Prange, G.B., Amirabdollahian, F.: Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11, 111 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Teasell, R.W., Kalra, L.: What’s new in stroke rehabilitation: back to basics. Stroke 36, 215–217 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lucas, L., Dicicco, M., Matsuoka, Y.: An EMG-controlled hand exoskeleton for natural pinching. J. Robot. Mechatron. 16, 1–7 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heo, P., Gu, G.M., Lee, S., Rhee, K., Kim, J.: Current hand exoskeleton technologies rehabilitation and assistive engineering. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 13, 807–824 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mulas, M., Folgheraiter, M., Gini, G.: An EMG-controlled exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, pp. 371–374 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wege, A., Kondak, K., Hommel, G.: Development and Control of a Hand Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation Construction of the Exoskeleton, pp. 149–157 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dicicco, M., Lucas, L., Matsuoka, Y., Engineering, M.: Comparison of control strategies for an EMG controlled orthotic exoskeleton for the hand. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1622–1627 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chiri, A., Vitiello, N., Giovacchini, F., Roccella, S., Vecchi, F., Carrozza, M.C.: Mechatronic design and characterization of the index finger module of a hand exoskeleton for post-stroke rehabilitation. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 17, 884–894 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ljung, L., Singh, R.: Version 8 of the system identification toolbox. IFAC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Muaz Alim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Taha, Z. et al. (2018). The Identification and Control of a Finger Exoskeleton for Grasping Rehabilitation. In: Hassan, M. (eds) Intelligent Manufacturing & Mechatronics. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8788-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8788-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8787-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8788-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics