Mind and Brain: Toward an Understanding of Dualism

  • Kristopher G. Phillips
  • Alan Beretta
  • Harry A. Whitaker
Chapter
Part of the History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences book series (HPTL, volume 6)

Abstract

A post-Newtonian understanding of matter includes immaterial forces; thus, the concept of ‘physical’ has lost what usefulness it previously had and consequently Cartesian dualism has ceased to support a divide between the mental and the physical. A scientific understanding of mind that goes back at least as far as Priestley (eighteenth century) not only includes immaterial components but identifies brain parts in which these components correlate with neural activity. What are we left with? The challenge is not so much to figure out how a physical brain interacts with a nonphysical mind, but to try to unify theories of mind and theories of brain that to date do not share a single property. The challenge is enormous, but at least we can be quite clear about its nature, as there is no reason to be distracted by the idea of two distinct substances. In the present volume, several historical perspectives on the mind-body problem are discussed; we follow major currents of thought regarding the mind-body problem so that it can be seen how we arrived at our conception that it makes sense only to talk about theory unification.

References

  1. Apostle H (1966) Aristotle’s metaphysics, translated with commentaries. The Peripatetic Press, GrinnellGoogle Scholar
  2. Apostle H (1969) Aristotle’s physics, translated with commentaries. The Peripatetic Press, GrinnellGoogle Scholar
  3. Apostle H, Gerson L (1991) Aristotle: selected works, 3rd edn. Peripatetic Press, GrinnellGoogle Scholar
  4. Atherton M (1994) Women philosophers of the early modern period. Hackett Publishing, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  5. Beretta A (2014) Joseph Priestley: an instructive 18th century perspective on the mind-body problem. In: Smith C, Whitaker H (eds) Brain and mind: essays in the history of neuroscience, Springer series in history, philosophy and theory of the life sciences. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bright T (1586) A treatise of melancholie, containing the canvases therof, and reasons of the strange effects it worketh in our minds and bodies: with the phisicke cure, and spirituall consolation for such as haue thereto adioyned an afflicted conscience. Thomas Vautrollier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Chalmers D (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Conscious Stud 2(3):200–219Google Scholar
  8. Chalmers D (1996) The conscious mind. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Chomsky N (1995) Language and nature. Mind 104:1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Churchland PS (2002) Brain-wise: studies in neurophilosophy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Cottingham J, Stoothoff R, Murdoch D (1984) The philosophical writings of Descartes vols I, II. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Cottingham J, Stoothoff R, Murdoch D, Kenny A (1991) The philosophical writings of Descartes, vol 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Letter to Meyssonnier: (CSMK, p. 143); Letter to Mersenne: (CSMK, p. 145); Letter to Regius (CSMK, p. 181)Google Scholar
  13. De la Mettrie JO (1748/1996) Machine man. In: Thomson A (ed) La Mettrie: machine man and other writings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–39Google Scholar
  14. Duerlinger J (2005) Plato’s Sophist: a translation with a detailed account of its theses and arguments. Peter Lang Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Frankfort H, Frankfort HA (1949) The intellectual adventure of ancient man: an essay on speculative thought in the ancient near East. Penguin, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  16. Green CD, Groff PR (2003) Early psychological thought: ancient accounts of mind and soul. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton E, Cairns H (1961) The collected dialogues of Plato including the letters. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaynes J (1990) The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirk GS, Raven JE (1971) The pre-socratic philosophers: a critical history with a selection of texts. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Kline M (1985) Mathematics and the search for knowledge. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis CS (1964) The discarded image: an introduction to medieval and renaissance literature. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Locke J (1690/1975) Nidditch PH (ed) An essay concerning human understanding. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Lockwood M (1989) Mind, brain and the quantum: the compound “I”. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Margoliash D, Nusbaum HC (2009) Language: the perspective from organismal biology. Trends Cogn Sci 13:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matson W (1966) Why isn’t the mind-body problem ancient? In: Feyerabend P, Maxwell G (eds) Mind, matter and method: essays in philosophy and science in honor of Herbert Feigl. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  26. Nagel T (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philos Rev 83:435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pulvermüller F (2002) The neuroscience of language: on brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Russo J, Simon B (1968) Homeric psychology and the oral epic tradition. J Hist Ideas 29(4):483–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryle G (2002) The concept of mind. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  30. Sabra AI (ed) (1983) The optics of Ibn al-Haytham, books I–II–III: on direct vision. The Arabic text, edited and with introduction, Arabic-Latin glossaries and concordance tables. National Council for Culture, Arts and Letters, KuwaitGoogle Scholar
  31. Sabra AI (ed) (2002) The optics of Ibn al-Haytham. Edition of the Arabic text of books IV–V: on reflection and images seen by reflection. 2 vols. The National Council for Culture, Arts and Letters, KuwaitGoogle Scholar
  32. Sandywell B (1996) The beginnings of European theorizing: logological investigations. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Smart JJC (1959) Sensations and brain processes. Philos Rev 68:141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Theurer KL, Bickle J (2013) What’s old is new again: Kemeny-Oppenheim reduction in current molecular neuroscience. Philos Sci 17(2):89–113Google Scholar
  35. Vesalius A (1998–2009) On the fabric of the human body (trans: Richardson WF, Carman JB), 5 vols. Norman Publishing, San Francisco/NovatoGoogle Scholar
  36. Whitaker HA (2007) Was medieval cell doctrine more modern than we thought? In: Cohen H, Stemmer B (eds) Consciousness and cognition: fragments of the mind and brain. Elsevier Science, London, pp 45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. White H (1963) An anatomy of kinship. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristopher G. Phillips
    • 1
  • Alan Beretta
    • 2
  • Harry A. Whitaker
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyNorthern Michigan UniversityMarquetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of LinguisticsMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyNorthern Michigan UniversityMarquetteUSA

Personalised recommendations