Skip to main content

Social acceleration and social investment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The European Social Model under Pressure

Abstract

The starting point for our contribution on the (alleged) crisis of the European social model is David Weisstanner and Klaus Armingeon’s (2018) study on the cross-national variation in wage premiums to discuss the temporal dimension of social investment policy – futureoriented policy par excellence. Our guiding propositions are that: (1) “social acceleration”, that is, the accelerating pace of change, particularly but not exclusively in technology, tends to complicate and ultimately undermine the assumptions of social investment policy; (2) the result will be increasingly higher inequality. Social investment policies are future-oriented social policies, investing in human capital in the short term to yield a social return in the middle or long term (e.g., early childhood education). Social acceleration causes the temporal outlook of social investment politics to become more short-term. Simultaneously, it contracts the long-term governing capacity, making it increasingly difficult to determine precisely in what kind of skills to invest now, in order to maximize the chance of social return in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron. 2002. “Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market.” Journal of Economic Literature 40 (1): 7–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Karen M., Ellen M. Immergut, and Isabelle Schulze. 2009. The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 1986. “Formation and Stability of Neo-Corporatist Incomes Policies.” European Sociological Review 2 (2): 138–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 1997. “Swiss Corporatism in Comparative Perspective.” West European Politics 20 (4): 164–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 2001. “Institutionalising the Swiss Welfare State.” West European Politics 24 (2): 145–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 2002a. “The Effects of Negotiation Democracy: A Comparative Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (1): 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 2002b. “Consociationalism and Economic Performance in Switzerland 1968–1998: The Conditions of Muddling through Successfully.” In “Consociationalism and Corporatism in Western Europe,” edited by Steiner, Jürg, and Tom Ertman Acta Politica 37 (1/2): 121–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 2007. “Active Labour Market Policy, International Organizations and Domestic Politics.” Journal of European Public Policy 14 (6): 905–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 2014. “The Politics of Fiscal Responses to the Economic Crisis, 2008–2009.” Governance 25 (4): 543–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, Fabio Bertozzi, and Giuliano Bonoli. 2004. “Swiss Worlds of Welfare.” West European Politics 27 (1): 20–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, and Romana Careja. 2008. “Institutional Change and Stability in Post-Communist Countries, 1990–2002.” European Journal of Political Research 47 (4): 411–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, and Skyler Cranmer. 2018. “Position-Taking in the Euro Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (4): 546–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus and Nathalie Giger. 2008. “Conditional Punishment: A Comparative Analysis of the Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment in OECD Nations, 1980–2003.” West European Politics 31 (3): 558–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, and Kai Guthmann. 2014. “Democracy in Crisis? The Declining Support for National Democracy in European Countries, 2007–2011.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (3): 423–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, Kai Guthmann, and David Weisstanner. 2016. “Choosing the Path of Austerity: How Parties and Policy Coalitions Influence Welfare State Retrenchment in Periods of Fiscal Consolidation.” West European Politics 39 (4): 628–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, and Lisa Schädel. 2015. “Social Inequality in Political Participation: The Dark Sides of Individualisation.” West European Politics 38 (1): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, David H. 2014. “Skills, Education, and the Rise of Earnings Inequality among the ‘Other 99 Percent’.” Science 344 (6186): 843–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, David H., and David Dorn. 2013. “The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market.” American Economic Review 103 (5): 1553–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avent, Ryan. 2016. The Wealth of Humans. Work and its Absence in the Twenty-First Century. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertman, Stephen. 1998. Hyperculture: The Human Cost of Speed. London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blix, Mårten. 2017. Digitalization, Immigration and the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, Giuliano. 2007. “Time Matters: Postindustrialization, New Social Risks, and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (5): 495–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2014. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesneaux, Jean. 2000. “Speed and Democracy: An Uneasy Dialogue.” Social Science Information 39 (3): 407–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, Richard, James Manyika, and Jonathan Woetzel. 2016. No Ordinary Disruption: The Four Global Forces Breaking All the Trends. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, Thomas H. 2001. Tyranny of the Moment. Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2009. Incomplete Revolution: Adapting Welfare states to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurofound. 2018. Automation, Digitalisation and Platforms: Implications for Work and Employment. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Martin. 2015. Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. London: Oneworld Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freese, Charissa, Ronald Dekker, Linda Kool, Fabian Dekker, and Rinie Val Est. 2018. Robotisering En Automatisering Op de Werkvloer Bedrijfskeuzes Bij Technologische Innovaties. The Hague: Rathenau Institute. https://www.rathenau.nl/sites/default/files/2018-05/Robotisering en automatisering op dewerkvloer.pdf.

  • Frey, Carl Benedikt, and Michael A. Osborne. 2017. “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114 (January): 254-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garritzmann, Julian, Silja Häusermann, Bruno Palier, and Christine Zollinger. 2016. “WoPSI - the World Politics of Social Investment: A Collaborative Research Project to Explain Variance in Social Investment Agendas and Social Investment Reforms across Countries and World Regions.” Project Background Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos, Maarten, and Alan Manning. 2007. “Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 89 (1): 118-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goos, Maarten, Alan Manning, and Anna Salomons. 2014. “Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring.” American Economic Review 104 (8): 2509–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, Robert. 2009. Empires of Speed. Time and the Acceleration of Politics and Society. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, Anton. 2013. Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Alan M. 2011. Governing for the Long Term: Democracy and the Politics of Investment. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Alan M. 2016. “Policy Making for the Long Term in Advanced Democracies.” Annual Review of Political Science 19: 433–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Alan M., and J. Scott Matthews. 2017. “Policy Attitudes in Institutional Context: Rules, Uncertainty, and the Mass Politics of Public Investment.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 194–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Carsten, and Kees van Kersbergen. 2017. The Politics of Inequality. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Jerry. 2015. Human Need Not Apply. A Guide to Wealth and Work in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Alan. 2016. “Lifelong Learning: Conclusions from a Literature Review.” International Online Journal of Primary Education 5 (2): 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korunka, Christian, and Peter Hoonakker. 2014. The Impact of ICT on Quality of Working Life. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvist, Jon. 2015. “A Framework for Social Investment Strategies: Integrating Generational, Life Course and Gender Perspectives in the EU Social Investment Strategy.” Comparative European Politics 13 (1): 131–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, Joel, Chris Vickers, and Nicolas L. Ziebarth. 2015. “The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different?”,The Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, Helga. 1989. Eigenzeit. Entstehung und Strukturierung eines Zeitgefühls. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2016. “New Forms of Work in the Digital Economy.” OECD Digital Economy Papers 260. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Claus. 1984. Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, Hartmut. 2015. Social Acceleration. A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, Karl. 2017. “42 Years of Microprocessor Trend Data” Accessed September 27, 2017. https://www.karlrupp.net/2018/02/42-years-of-microprocessor-trend-data/

  • Scarpetta, Stefano, Anne Sonnet, Ilias Livanos, Imanol Núñez, W. Craig Riddell, Xueda Song, and Ilaria Maselli. 2012. “Challenges Facing European Labour Markets: Is a Skill Upgrade the Appropriate Instrument?” Intereconomics 47 (1): 4–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, William E. 2004. Liberal Democracy and the Social Acceleration of Time. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöneck, Nadine M. 2018. “Europeans’ Work and Life – Out of Balance? An Empirical Test of Assumptions from the ‘Acceleration Debate’”. Time & Society 27 (1): 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, Klaus. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Cologny/Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • SER. 2016. Mens En Technologie: Samen Aan Het Werk. The Hague: Sociaal-economische Raad. https://www.ser.nl/~/media/db_adviezen/2010_2019/2016/mens-technologie.ashx.

  • Statista. 2019. “Number of daily active Snapchat users from 1st quarter 2014 to 4th quarter 2018 (in millions)” Accessed September 21, 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/545967/snapchat-app-dau/

  • St. Clair, Michael. 2011. So Much, So Fast, So Little Time. Coming to Terms with Rapid Change and its Consequences. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuerle, C. Eugene. 2016. “The Federal Government on Autopilot: Mandatory Spending and the Entitlement Crisis.” 2016.https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/federal-government-autopilot-mandatory-spendingand-entitlement-crisis.

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, and Daniel Mertens. 2010. “An Index of Fiscal Democracy.” MPIfG Working Paper 10/3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Est, Rinie and Linda Kool. 2015. Werken Aan de Robotsamenleving: Visies En Inzichten Uit de Wetenschap over de Relatie Technologie En Werkgelegenheid. The Hague: Rathenau Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kersbergen, Kees, and Barbara Vis. 2014. Comparative Welfare State Politics: Development Opportunities, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, Judy. 2008. “Life in the Fast Lane? Towards a Sociology of Technology and Time.” British Journal of Sociology 59 (1): 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, Judy. 2015. Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisstanner, David, and Klaus Armingeon. 2018. “How Redistributive Policies Reduce Market Inequality: Education Premiums in 22 OECD Countries.” Socio-Economic Review. Early view. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy018.

  • Went, Robert, Monique Kremer, and André Knottnerus. 2015. De Robot de Baas: De Toekomst van Werk in Het Tweede Machinetijdperk. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kees van Kersbergen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kersbergen, K.v., Vis, B. (2020). Social acceleration and social investment. In: Careja, R., Emmenegger, P., Giger, N. (eds) The European Social Model under Pressure. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics