Skip to main content

Bird Diversity Improves the Well-Being of City Residents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments

Abstract

Humans are increasingly becoming urbanized. Because a number of bird species readily live in urban areas and birds are relatively easily observed, birds are becoming the largest everyday encounter with wild fauna people will have, globally. Despite, few studies have been made on how visual (or acoustic) bird encounter affects humans. The few existing studies show that birds provide humans with increased self-evaluated well-being when seeing and hearing them. These values provided by birds can be recognized as a cultural ecosystems service.

Here we review extant literature to consider why certain species fascinate humans more than others, and some can increase well-being and provide ecosystem services, while others offer disservices through unappealing characteristics. We particularly highlight indications of links between species diversity and well-being. Finally, we discuss possible reasons for variations in our responses to birds and birdsong associated with age, gender, childhood, contact with nature, and the biophilia theory.

If interaction with birds truly increases quality of life, then this value should be considered in the planning of sustainable cities. Both conservation and proper management of existing urban green areas are needed to increase possibilities to encounter many bird species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcock I, White MP, Wheeler BW, Fleming LE, Depledge MH (2014) Longitudinal effects on mental health of moving to greener and less green urban areas. Environ Sci Technol 48:1247–1255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Annerstedt M, Jönsson P, Wallergård M, Johansson G, Karlson B, Grahn P, Hansen ÅM, Währborg P (2013) Inducing physiological stress recovery with sounds of nature in a virtual reality forest—Results from a pilot study. Physiol Behav 118:240–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balter M (2010) Evolution of language, animal communication helps reveal roots of language. Science 328:969–971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belaire A, Westphal LM, Whelan CJ, Minor ES (2015) Urban residents’ perceptions of birds in the neighborhood: biodiversity, cultural ecosystem services, and disservices. Condor 117:192–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benfield JA, Bell PA, Troup LJ, Soderstrom NC (2010) Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment. J Environ Psychol 30:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke T, Østdahl T (2004) Animal-related attitudes and activities in an urban population. Anthrozoös 17:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björk EA (1985) The perceived quality of natural sounds. Acustica 57:185–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Björk J, Albin M, Grahn P, Jacobsson H, Ardö J, Wadbro J, Östergren PO, Skärbäck E (2008) Recreational values of the natural environment in relation to neighbourhood satisfaction, physical activity, obesity and wellbeing. J Epidemiol Community Health 62:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (2001) Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the U.S. In: Lockwood JL, McKinney ML (eds) Biotic homogenization. Norwell (MA): Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, pp 33–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolhuis JJ, Okanoya K, Scharff C (2010) Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech. Nat Rev 11:747–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown TL, Dawson CP, Miller RL (1979) Interests and attitudes of metropolitan New York residents about wildlife. Trans N Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 44:289–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau P, Mennechez G, Sauvage A, Lemoine A (2001) Human perception and appreciation of birds: a motivation for wildlife conservation in urban environments of France. In: Marzluff M, Bowman R, Donelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Clucas B, Marzluff JM (2014) Attitude and actions toward birds in urban areas; human cultural differences influence bird behavior. Auk 129(1):8–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Clucas B, Rabotyagov S, Marzluff JM (2014) How much is that birdie in my backyard? A cross-continental economic valuation of native urban songbirds. Urban Ecosyst 18:251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocker M, Tipling D (eds) (2013) Birds and people. Jonathan Cape, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen DA, McKenzie TL, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D, Lurie N (2007) Contribution of public parks to physical activity. Am J Public Health 97(3):509–514

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Coluccy JM, Drobney RD, Graber DA, Sheriff SL, Witter DJ (2001) Attitudes of central Missouri residents toward local giant Canada geese and management alternatives. Wildl Soc Bull 29:116–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper CB, Smith JA (2010) Gender patterns in bird-related recreation in the USA and UK. Ecol Soc 15(4):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AMJ, Davies ZG, Rouquette JR, Maltby LL, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ (2012) Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 62:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AY, Belaire A, Fafran MA, Milz D, Sweeney ER, Loss SR, Minor ES (2012) Green infrastructure and bird diversity across an urban socioeconomic gradient. Ecosphere 3:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson CP, Miller RL, Brown TL (1978) Human attitudes toward urban wildlife. Trans Northeast Sect Wildl Soc 35:143–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Earp SE, Maney DL (2012) Birdsong: Is it music to their ears? Front Evol Neurosci 4:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fivush R, Bohanek JG, Zaman W, Grapin S (2012) Gender differences in adolescents’ autobiographical narratives. J Cogn Dev 13:295–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson LM, Anderson DH (1999) A qualitative exploration of the wilderness experience as a source of spiritual inspiration. J Environ Psychol 19:21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of green space increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3:390–394

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Katherine NI, Davies ZG, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ (2012) Interactions between people and birds in urban landscapes. In: Lepczyk CA, Warren PA (eds) Urban bird ecology and conservation. Studies in avian biology (no. 45). University of California Press, Berkley, CA, pp 249–266

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giusti M, Barthel S, Marcus L (2014) Nature routines and affinity with the biosphere: a case study of preschool children in Stockholm. Child Youth Environ 24:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahn P, Stigsdotter U (2003) Landscape planning and stress. Urban For Urban Green 2:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halfwerk W, Bot S, Buikx J, van der Velde M, Komdeur J, ten Cate C, Slabbekoorn H (2011) Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:14549–14554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Mang M, Evans G (1991) Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environ Behav 23:3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H (2014) Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health 35:207–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedblom M, Söderström B (2010) Importance of urban and peri-urban woodlands for the avi-fauna in urban forest fragments: an analysis of 34 Swedish cities. J Biogeogr 37:1302–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedblom M, Heyman E, Antonsson H, Gunnarsson B (2014) Birdsong diversity influences people’s appreciation of urban landscapes. Urban For Urban Green 13(3):469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman E (2010) Clearance of understory in urban woodlands: assessing impact on bird abundance and diversity. For Ecol Manag 260:125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman E, Gunnarsson B, Dovydavicius L (2016) Management of urban nature and its impact on bird ecosystem services. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 465–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough RL (2014) Biodiversity and human health: evidence for causality? Biodiver Conserv 23:267–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson C (1993) Doing what comes naturally? Women and environment in development. World Dev 21:1947–1963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerzak L (2001) Suburbanization of the magpie in the Palearctic. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp 503–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns-Laird PN, Oatley K (2010) Emotions, music, and literature. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Feldman Barret L (eds) Handbook of emotions. Guilford, New York City, NY, pp 102–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Smale BJA, Havitz ME (2009) Association of parkland proximity with neighborhood and park-based physical activity: variations by gender and age. Leis Sci 31(2):174–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 16:169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keniger LE, Gaston KJ, Irvine KN, Fuller RA (2013) What are the benefits of interacting with nature? Int J Environ Res Public Health 10:913–935

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellgren A, Buhrkall H (2010) A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment. J Environ Psychol 30:464–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knez I (2006) Autobiographical memories for places. Memory 14:359–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knez I (2014a) Affective and cognitive reactions to subliminal flicker from fluorescent lighting. Conscious Cogn 26:97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knez I (2014b) Place and the self: An autobiographical memory synthesis. Philos Psychol 2:164–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knez I, Kers C (2000) Effects of indoor lighting, gender and age on mood and cognitive performance. Environ Behav 6:817–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knez I, Thorsson S, Eliasson I (2013) Climate change: concerns, beliefs, and emotions in residents, experts, decision makers, tourists, and tourist industry. Am J Clim Chang 2:254–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause B (2014) The great animal orchestra. Finding the origins of music in the world’s wild places. Profile Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk AC, Warren PS, Machabée L, Kinzig AP, Mertig AG (2012) Who feeds the birds? A comparison across regions. In: Lepczyk AC, Warren PS (eds) Urban bird ecology and conservation. Studies in avian biology, no 45. The Cooper Ornithological Society. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk CA, La Sorte F, Aronson M, Goddard M, MacGregor-Fors I, Nilon C, Warren P (2016) Global patterns and drivers of urban birds. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 13–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Davidson P, Boxall D, Smallbone L (2011) Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conserv Biol 25:816–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magai C (2001) Emotions over the lifespan. In: Birren JE, Schai KW (eds) Handbook of the psychology of aging. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 310–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler P (2000) Origins of music and speech: insights from animals. In: Wallin NL, Merker B, Brown S (eds) The origins of music. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston, MA, p 19–47

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melles SJ (2005) Urban bird diversity as an indicator of human social diversity and economic inequality in Vancouver, British Columbia. Urban Habitats 3:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R, Popham F (2008) Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 372:1655–1660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myer FS, Franz CM (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J Environ Psychol 24:503–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne SR (2013) The production of a perceived restorativeness soundscape scale. Appl Acoust 74:255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plambech T, Konijnendijk van den Bosch CC (2015) The impact of nature on creativity – a study among Danish creative professionals. Urban For Urban Green 14:255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randler C (2008) Risk assessment by crow phenotype in a hybrid zone. J Ethol 26:309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe E (2015) Restorative perceptions and outcomes associated with listening to birds. Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Psychology Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences, University of Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe E, Gatersleben B, Sowden PT (2013) Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery. J Environ Psychol 36:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander HA, Zhao C (2015) Urban green and blue: Who values what and where? Land Use Policy 42:194–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanga I (2006) Kumpolo: aesthetic appreciation and cultural appropriation of bird sounds in Tanzania. Folklore 117:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipperijn J, Ekholm O, Stigsdotter UK, Toftager M, Bentsen P, Kamper-Jørgensen F, Randrup TB (2010) Factors influencing the use of green space: results from a Danish national representative survey. Landsc Urban Plan 95:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shochat E (2004) Credit or debit? Resource input changes population dynamics of city-slicker birds. Oikos 106:622–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz A, Turbé A, Simon L, Julliard R (2014) Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: an experiment. Biol Conserv 171:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamosiunas A, Grazuleviciene R, Luksiene D, Dedele A, Reklaitiene R, Baceviciene M, Vencloviene J, Bernotiene G, Radisauskas R, Malinauskiene V et al (2014) Accessibility and use of urban green spaces, and cardiovascular health: findings from a Kaunas cohort study. Environ Health 13:20. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-13-20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson CW, Aspinall P, Montarzino A (2008) The childhood factor. Adult visits to green places and the significance of childhood experience. Environ Behav 40:111–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe WH (1961) Birdsong: the biology of vocal communication and expression in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmers M, Fischer AH, Manstead ASR (2003) Ability versus vulnerability: beliefs about men’s and women’s emotional behavior. Cognit Emot 17:41–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrväinen L, Mäkinen K, Schipperijn J (2007) Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 79(1):5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrväinen L, Ojala A, Korpela K, Tsunetsugu Y, Kawaga T, Lanki T (2014) The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: a field experiment. J Environ Psychol 38:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Interior (2011) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11:201–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN 2014. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352)

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcarcel A, Fernández-Juricic E (2009) Antipredator strategies of house finches: Are urban habitats safe spots from predators even when humans are around? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:637–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viollon S, Lavandier C, Drake C (2002) Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban Environment. Appl Acoust 63:493–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallin NL, Merker B, Brown S (2000) The origins of music. The MIT press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. ISBN 0-674-07442-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Goodale E, Chen J (2014) How contact with nature affects children’s biophilia, biophobia and conservation attitude in China. Biol Conserv 177:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Debora Arlt and Matthew Hiron from the Department of Ecology at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences for their valuable comments regarding the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Hedblom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hedblom, M., Knez, I., Gunnarsson, B. (2017). Bird Diversity Improves the Well-Being of City Residents. In: Murgui, E., Hedblom, M. (eds) Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics