Skip to main content

Adaptable Image Quality Assessment Using Meta-Reinforcement Learning of Task Amenability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Simplifying Medical Ultrasound (ASMUS 2021)

Abstract

The performance of many medical image analysis tasks are strongly associated with image data quality. When developing modern deep learning algorithms, rather than relying on subjective (human-based) image quality assessment (IQA), task amenability potentially provides an objective measure of task-specific image quality. To predict task amenability, an IQA agent is trained using reinforcement learning (RL) with a simultaneously optimised task predictor, such as a classification or segmentation neural network. In this work, we develop transfer learning or adaptation strategies to increase the adaptability of both the IQA agent and the task predictor so that they are less dependent on high-quality, expert-labelled training data. The proposed transfer learning strategy re-formulates the original RL problem for task amenability in a meta-reinforcement learning (meta-RL) framework. The resulting algorithm facilitates efficient adaptation of the agent to different definitions of image quality, each with its own Markov decision process environment including different images, labels and an adaptable task predictor. Our work demonstrates that the IQA agents pre-trained on non-expert task labels can be adapted to predict task amenability as defined by expert task labels, using only a small set of expert labels. Using 6644 clinical ultrasound images from 249 prostate cancer patients, our results for image classification and segmentation tasks show that the proposed IQA method can be adapted using data with as few as respective 19.7\(\%\) and 29.6\(\%\) expert-reviewed consensus labels and still achieve comparable IQA and task performance, which would otherwise require a training dataset with 100\(\%\) expert labels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tasks refer to the target classification or segmentation tasks, while MDPs or environments are preferred over meta-tasks found in meta-learning literature for clarity.

References

  1. Chow, L.S., Paramesran, R.: Review of medical image quality assessment. Biomed. Sig. Process. Control 27, 145–154 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Esses, S.J., et al.: Automated image quality evaluation of T2-weighted liver MRI utilizing deep learning architecture. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 47(3), 723–728 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zago, G.T., Andreão, R.V., Dorizzi, B., Ottoni, E., Salles, T.: Retinal image quality assessment using deep learning. Comput. Biol. Med. 103, 64–70 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baum, Z.M.C., et al.: Image quality assessment for closed-loop computer-assisted lung ultrasound. In: Linte, C.A., Siewerdsen, J.H. (eds.) Medical Imaging 2021: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling, vol. 11598, pp. 160–166. International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2581865

  5. Abdi, A.H., et al.: Automatic quality assessment of echocardiograms using convolutional neural networks: feasibility on the apical four-chamber view. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 36(6), 1221–1230 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2690836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liao, Z., et al.: On modelling label uncertainty in deep neural networks: automatic estimation of intra-observer variability in 2D echocardiography quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 39(6), 1868–1883 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, L., Cheng, J., Li, S., Lei, B., Wang, T., Ni, D.: FUIQA: fetal ultrasound image quality assessment with deep convolutional networks. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 47(5), 1336–1349 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, Z., et al.: Multi-task learning for quality assessment of fetal head ultrasound images. Med. Image Anal. 58, 101548 (2019). ISSN: 1361-8415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.101548

  9. Davis, H., Russell, S., Barriga, E., Abramoff, M., Soliz, P.: Vision-based, real-time retinal image quality assessment, pp. 1–6 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Köhler, T., Budai, A., Kraus, M.F., Odstrèilik, J., Michelson, G., Hornegger, J.: Automatic no-reference quality assessment for retinal fundus images using vessel segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, pp. 95–100 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Loizou, C.P., Pattichis, C.S., Pantziaris, M., Tyllis, T., Nicolaides, A.: Quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging in the carotid artery based on normalization and speckle reduction filtering. Med. Bio. Eng. Comp. 44, 414 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saeed, S.U., et al.: Learning image quality assessment by reinforcing task amenable data selection. In: Feragen, A., Sommer, S., Schnabel, J., Nielsen, M. (eds.) IPMI 2021. LNCS, vol. 12729, pp. 755–766. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78191-0_58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoon, J., Arik, S., Pfister, T.: Data Valuation using Reinforcement Learning. arXiv: 1909.11671 (2020)

  14. Duan, Y., Schulman, J., Chen, X., Bartlett, P.L., Sutskever, I., Abbeel, P.: RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learning. arXiv: 1611.02779 [cs.AI] (2016)

  15. Wang, J.X., et al.: Learning to reinforcement learn. arXiv: 1611.05763 [cs.LG] (2017)

  16. Cotter, N.E., Conwell, P.R.: Fixed-weight networks can learn. In: 1990 IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 3, pp. 553–559 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Santoro, A., Bartunov, S., Botvinick, M., Wierstra, D., Lillicrap, T.: Meta-learning with memory-augmented neural networks. In: Balcan, M.F., Weinberger, K.Q. (eds.) Proceedings of The 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 48, pp. 1842–1850. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. PMLR, New York, New York, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Younger, A.S., Conwell, P.R., Cotter, N.E.: Fixed-weight on-line learning. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 10(2), 272–283 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/72.750553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hochreiter, S., Younger, A.S., Conwell, P.R.: Learning to learn using gradient descent. In: Dorffner, G., Bischof, H., Hornik, K. (eds.) ICANN 2001. LNCS, vol. 2130, pp. 87–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44668-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Prokhorov, D.V., Feldkarnp, L.A., Tyukin, I.Y.: Adaptive behavior with fixed weights in RNN: an overview. In: Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN 2002, vol. 3, pp. 2018–2022 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2002.1007449

  21. Botvinick, M., Ritter, S., Wang, J.X., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Blundell, C., Hassabis, D.: Reinforcement learning, fast and slow. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23(5), 408–422 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., Klimov, O.: Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms. arXiv: 1707.06347 [cs.LG] (2017)

  23. Nichol, A., Achiam, J., Schulman, J.: On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithms. arXiv: 1803.02999 [cs.LG] (2018)

  24. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: NeurIPS (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences [203145Z/16/Z], the CRUK International Alliance for Cancer Early Detection (ACED) [C28070/A30912; C73666/A31378], EPSRC CDT in i4health [EP/S021930/1], the Departments of Radiology and Urology, Stanford University, an MRC Clinical Research Training Fellowship [MR/S005897/1] (VS), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Postgraduate Scholarships-Doctoral Program (ZMCB), the University College London Overseas and Graduate Research Scholarships (ZMCB), GE Blue Sky Award (MR), and the generous philanthropic support of our patients (GAS). Previous support from the European Association of Cancer Research [2018 Travel Fellowship] (VS) and the Alan Turing Institute [EPSRC grant EP/N510129/1] (VS) is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaheer U. Saeed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saeed, S.U. et al. (2021). Adaptable Image Quality Assessment Using Meta-Reinforcement Learning of Task Amenability. In: Noble, J.A., Aylward, S., Grimwood, A., Min, Z., Lee, SL., Hu, Y. (eds) Simplifying Medical Ultrasound. ASMUS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12967. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87583-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87583-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87582-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87583-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics