Skip to main content

Learning Image Quality Assessment by Reinforcing Task Amenable Data Selection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI 2021)

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a type of image quality assessment (IQA) as a task-specific measurement, which can be used to select images that are more amenable to a given target task, such as image classification or segmentation. We propose to train simultaneously two neural networks for image selection and a target task using reinforcement learning. A controller network learns an image selection policy by maximising an accumulated reward based on the target task performance on the controller-selected validation set, whilst the target task predictor is optimised using the training set. The trained controller is therefore able to reject images that lead to poor accuracy in the target task. In this work, we show that controller-predicted IQA can be significantly different from task-specific quality labels manually defined by humans. Furthermore, we demonstrate that it is possible to learn effective IQA without a “clean” validation set, thereby avoiding the requirement for human labels of task amenability. Using 6712, labelled and segmented, clinical ultrasound images from 259 patients, experimental results on holdout data show that the proposed IQA achieved a mean classification accuracy of \(0.94\pm 0.01\) and a mean segmentation Dice of \(0.89\pm 0.02\), by discarding \(5\%\) and \(15\%\) of the acquired images, respectively. The significantly improved performance was observed for both tested tasks, compared with the respective \(0.90\pm 0.01\) and \(0.82\pm 0.02\) from networks without considering task amenability. This enables IQA feedback during real-time ultrasound acquisition among many other medical imaging applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davis, H., Russell, S., Barriga, E., Abramoff, M., Soliz, P.: Vision-based, real-time retinal image quality assessment. In: 2009 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, pp. 1–6 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wu, L., Cheng, J., Li, S., Lei, B., Wang, T., Ni, D.: FUIQA: fetal ultrasound image quality assessment with deep convolutional networks. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 47(5), 1336–1349 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chow, L.S., Paramesran, R.: Review of medical image quality assessment. Biomed. Sig. Process. Control 27, 145–154 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Loizou, C.P., Pattichis, C.S., Pantziaris, M., Tyllis, T., Nicolaides, A.: Quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging in the carotid artery based on normalization and speckle reduction filtering. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 44, 414 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0045-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Köhler, T., Budai, A., Kraus, M.F., Odstrčilik, J., Michelson, G., Hornegger, J.: Automatic no-reference quality assessment for retinal fundus images using vessel segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, pp. 95–100 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zago, G.T., Andreão, R.V., Dorizzi, B., Ottoni, E., Salles, T.: Retinal image quality assessment using deep learning. Comput. Biol. Med. 103, 64–70 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Esses, S.J., et al.: Automated image quality evaluation of T2-weighted liver MRI utilizing deep learning architecture. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 47(3), 723–728 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baum, Z.M.C.: Image quality assessment for closed-loop computer-assisted lung ultrasound. arXiv: 2008.08840 (2020)

  9. Cubuk, E.D., Zoph, B., Mane, D., Vasudevan, V., Le, Q.V.: AutoAugment: learning augmentation policies from data. arXiv: 1805.09501 (2019)

  10. Zhang, X., Wang, Q., Zhang, J., Zhong, Z.: Adversarial autoAugment. arXiv: 1912.11188 (2019)

  11. Li, C., et al.: AM-LFS: AutoML for loss function search. In: 2019 ICCV, pp. 8409–8418 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yoon, J., Arik, S., Pfister, T.: Data valuation using reinforcement learning. arXiv: 1909.11671 (2020)

  13. Zoph, B., Le, Q.V.: Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning. arXiv: 1611.01578 (2017)

  14. Wang, J., et al.: Auto-weighting for breast cancer classification in multimodal ultrasound. In: Matyel, A.L., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12266, pp. 190–199. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59725-2_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, D., Roth, H., Xu, Z., Milletari, F., Zhang, L., Xu, D.: Searching learning strategy with reinforcement learning for 3D medical image segmentation. In: Shen, D., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2019. LNCS, vol. 11765, pp. 3–11. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32245-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams, R.J.: Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Mach. Learn. 8, 229–256 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., Klimov, O.: Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv: 1707.06347 (2017)

  18. Lillicrap, T.P., et al.: Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv: 1509.02971 (2019)

  19. Uhlenbeck, G.E., Ornstein, L.S.: On the theory of the brownian motion. Phys. Rev. 36(5), 823–841 (1930)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: NeurIPS (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bressem, K.K., Adams, L.C., Erxleben, C., Hamm, B., Niehues, S.M., Vahldiek, J.L.: Comparing different deep learning architectures for classification of chest radiographs. Scientific Report. 10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences [203145Z/16/Z], the CRUK International Alliance for Cancer Early Detection (ACED) [C28070/A30912; C73666/A31378], EPSRC CDT in i4health [EP/S021930/1], the Departments of Radiology and Urology, Stanford University, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Postgraduate Scholarships-Doctoral Program (ZMCB), the University College London Overseas and Graduate Research Scholarships (ZMCB), GE Blue Sky Award (MR), and the generous philanthropic support of our patients (GAS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaheer U. Saeed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saeed, S.U. et al. (2021). Learning Image Quality Assessment by Reinforcing Task Amenable Data Selection. In: Feragen, A., Sommer, S., Schnabel, J., Nielsen, M. (eds) Information Processing in Medical Imaging. IPMI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12729. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78191-0_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78191-0_58

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78190-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78191-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics