Skip to main content

Digital Services for Industry 4.0: Assessing Collaborative Technology Readiness

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2019)

Abstract

Collaborative technologies, such as peer-to-peer (P2P) communication systems, information sharing technologies, and online team meeting facilities have long been available to support the daily operation of businesses. We investigate how collaborative technologies can adapt to further underpin emerging business paradigms, namely the “Industry 4.0” trend. Our purpose is to contribute to the understanding of what characteristics would maintain a collaborative technology current and ready to be part of the digital services available to support the fourth industrial revolution demands. To fulfil this purpose, we propose a taxonomic solution for assessment of collaborative technologies readiness for Industry 4.0; the analysis obtained using this classification scheme serves as an indicator to elicitate what is required to be addressed to meet Industry 4.0 goals. We also present details about the taxonomy development and validation using a benchmarking approach. Finally, we exemplify how our taxonomy can be applied to assess a collaborative technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.boostaerospace.com/airsupply/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.freightquote.com/define/what-is-transportation-management-system-tms.

  3. 3.

    https://twitter.com.

  4. 4.

    http://www.boostaerospace.com/aircollab/.

  5. 5.

    https://products.office.com/en-us/microsoft-lync-2013.

  6. 6.

    Production planning service is used to plan products, materials and resources [23].

  7. 7.

    Matchmaking is a service that provides suggestions of best potential partners for a given business opportunity [24].

  8. 8.

    Team creation is a kind of temporary alliance that is developed for short-term to share skills or core competencies and resources in order to better respond to business opportunities [24, 25].

  9. 9.

    These are customers’ requirement analysis that can be in the form of tracing individual customer order specification from the shop floor and monitoring their order execution and may involve forecasting item delivery and evaluating customer satisfaction [26].

  10. 10.

    Risk evaluation is a process to compare the estimated risk against the given risk criteria [27].

  11. 11.

    Tender-decomposition is a business opportunity that supports tenders breakdown into sub-tenders [28].

  12. 12.

    https://www.boostaerospace.com/.

  13. 13.

    https://www.ariba.com/.

  14. 14.

    http://www.supplyon.com/.

  15. 15.

    http://www.kinaxis.com/en/.

  16. 16.

    http://www.quintiq.com/.

  17. 17.

    https://www.generixgroup.com/en.

  18. 18.

    https://www.arts.aero/references.

  19. 19.

    https://valuechain.com/supply-chain-intelligence/iQluster/

  20. 20.

    https://www.tradecloud1.com/blog/topic/collaboration.

  21. 21.

    https://www.exostar.com/.

References

  1. Möller, D.P.F.: Digital manufacturing/Industry 4.0. Guide to Computing Fundamentals in Cyber-Physical Systems. CCN, pp. 307–375. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25178-3_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Oesterreich, T.D., Teuteberg, F.: Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: a triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Comput. Ind. 83, 121–139 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Almada-Lobo, F.: The Industry 4.0 revolution and the future of manufacturing execution systems (MES). J. Innov. Manag. (2015). https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_003.004_0003

  4. Cisneros-Cabrera, S., Ramzan, A., Sampaio, P., Mehandjiev, N.: Digital marketplaces for Industry 4.0: a survey and gap analysis. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Fornasiero, R. (eds.) PRO-VE 2017. IAICT, vol. 506, pp. 18–27. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65151-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Heng, S.: Industry 4.0: upgrading of Germany’s industrial capabilities on the horizon, April 2014

    Google Scholar 

  6. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Fornasiero, R., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative networks as a core enabler of Industry 4.0. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Fornasiero, R. (eds.) PRO-VE 2017. IAICT, vol. 506, pp. 3–17. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65151-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Shih, H.-p., Lai, K.-h., Cheng, T.C.E.: Examining structural, perceptual, and attitudinal influences on the quality of information sharing in collaborative technology use. Inf. Syst. Front. 17(2), 455–470 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9429-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Havle, C.A., Ucler, C.: Enablers for Industry 4.0. In: Proceedings of ISMSIT 2018 - 2nd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ismsit.2018.8567293

  9. Trotta, D., Garengo, P.: Industry 4.0 key research topics: a bibliometric review. In: 2018 7th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management, ICITM 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/icitm.2018.8333930

  10. Hermann, M., Pentek, T., Otto, B.: Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3928–3937. IEEE (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2016.488

  11. Erhun, F., Keskinocak, P.: Collaborative supply chain management. In: Kempf, K.G., Keskinocak, P., Uzsoy, R. (eds.) Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise. ISORMS, vol. 151, pp. 233–268. Springer, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6485-4_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. European Commission: Digital Automation. Research & Innovation Opportunities (2015). http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/fof-11-2016.html. Accessed 21 Nov 2018

  13. Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.26

  14. Rummler, S., Ng, K.B.: Collaborative technologies and applications for interactive information design: emerging trends in user experiences (2009). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-727-0

  15. Bailey, K.D.: A three-level measurement model. Qual. Quant. 18, 225–245 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Green, E.: What to do if Skype is blocked in your country—NordVPN. NordVPN (2018). https://nordvpn.com/blog/why-is-skype-blocked-in-certain-countries/. Accessed 04 Nov 2019

  17. Petersen, S.A.: Virtual enterprise formation and partner selection: an analysis using case studies. Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organ. 4(2), 201–215 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2007.013544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Soranzo, A., Cooksey, D.: Testing taxonomies: beyond card sorting. Bull. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2015.1720410509

  19. Usman, M., Britto, R., Börstler, J., Mendes, E.: Taxonomies in software engineering: a systematic mapping study and a revised taxonomy development method. Inf. Softw. Technol., 43–59 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.01.006

  20. Mentzas, G.N.: Coordination of joint tasks in organizational processes. J. Inf. Technol. 8, 139–150 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.1993.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nickerson, R.C.: A taxonomy of collaborative applications. In: Proceedings of the {AIS} 1997 Americas Conference on Information Systems (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bafoutsou, G., Mentzas, G.: Review and functional classification of collaborative systems. Int. J. Inf. Manag. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-4012(02)00013-0

  23. Jiru, F., Harcuba, O.: Main Processes and Their Requirements in the DigiCor Platform (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kazantsev, N., Pishchulov, G., Mehandjiev, N., Sampaio, P.: Formation of demand-driven collaborations between suppliers in Industry 4.0 production networks. In: Grubbström, R.W., Hinterhuber, H.H., Lundquist, J. (eds.) 20th International Working Seminar on Production Economics, Innsbruck, Austria, vol. 3, pp. 255–266 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: The virtual enterprise concept. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) PRO-VE 1999. ITIFIP, vol. 27, pp. 3–14. Springer, Boston, MA (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35577-1_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Maguire, M., Bevan, N.: User requirements analysis. In: Hammond, J., Gross, T., Wesson, J. (eds.) Usability. ITIFIP, vol. 99, pp. 133–148. Springer, Boston, MA (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35610-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Refsdal, A., Solhaug, B., Stølen, K.: Risk evaluation. Cyber-Risk Management. SCS, pp. 91–96. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23570-7_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Cisneros-Cabrera, S., Sampaio, P., Mehandjiev, N.: A B2B team formation microservice for collaborative manufacturing in Industry 4.0. In: 2018 IEEE World Congress on Services (SERVICES). IEEE, San Francisco (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/services.2018.00032

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented has received funding from the European Commission under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement n° 723336). Financial support has been provided from the National Council of Science and Technology (abbreviated CONACYT) to Sonia Cisneros-Cabrera (agreement n° 461338).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia Cisneros-Cabrera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ramzan, A., Cisneros-Cabrera, S., Sampaio, P., Mehandjiev, N., Kazantsev, N. (2020). Digital Services for Industry 4.0: Assessing Collaborative Technology Readiness. In: Themistocleous, M., Papadaki, M. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 381. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44322-1_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44322-1_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44321-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44322-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics