Skip to main content

Modeling of Food Choice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Influences on Eating

Abstract

Even before deciding how much to eat, people usually have already chosen what they are going to eat. Food choice and food preferences are determined in part by biological factors, but social factors play an important role. Studies of modeling show that young children and young adults imitate the food choices of others. This is true when the options involve: 1) a healthful/low calorie food vs. a not-so-healthful/high calorie food; 2) a familiar food vs. a novel food; and 3) a well-liked/highly preferred food vs. a less-liked/less-preferred food. We suggest three mechanisms that might account for these phenomena. First, in keeping with the main theme of this book, modeling of food choice may be driven by people’s (and particularly women’s) desire to eat in a way that adheres to social norms about appropriate eating (i.e., not consuming more calories or choosing more fattening/less healthful foods than others) and that conveys a suitable impression. Second, effect of watching someone else select a food can, in addition to letting us know what is the appropriate or impression-enhancing thing to select, also reassure us about what is safe to eat. And, finally, observing someone else eating something (and having no negative reaction) can signal that the food tastes good. In addition to modeling, abstract social norms (notions about what people generally do or what people should do) affect food choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addessi, E., Galloway, A. T., Visalberghi, E., & Birch, L. L. (2005). Specific social influences on the acceptance of novel foods in 2–5-year-old children. Appetite, 45, 264–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. M., Hemingway, A., Saulais, L., Dinnella, C., Monteleone, E., Depezay, L., …, Hartwell, H. (2016). Increasing vegetable intakes: Rationale and systematic review of published intervention. European Journal of Nutrition, 55, 869–896.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Grusec, J. E., & Menlove, F. L. (1967). Vicarious extinction of avoidance behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 16–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., & Rand, L. (2008). Shifting signals to help health: Using identity signaling to reduce risky health behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 509–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, L. L. (1980). Effects of peer models’ food choices and eating behaviors on preschoolers’ food preferences. Child Development, 51, 489–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, L. L., & Marlin, D. W. (1982). I don’t like it, I never tried it, effects of exposure on 2-year-old children’s food preferences. Appetite, 3, 353–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, K., Rettie, R., & Patel, K. (2013). Marketing social norms: Social marketing and the ‘social norm approach’. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. M., Bell, H., Harvey, K., Johnson, J., Stewart, C., Dorian, K., & Swedroe, M. (2010). Nutritious or delicious? The effect of descriptive norm information on food choice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, R., & Rozin, P. (1989). Changing children’s food preferences: Parent opinions. Appetite, 12, 171–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B. (2008). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. N., & Evans, G. (2008). Construction and validation of a psychometric scale to measure consumers’ fears of novel food technologies: The food technology neophobia scale. Food Quality and Preference, 19, 704–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, P., Griffith, R., & O’connell, M. (2018). The effects of banning advertising in junk food markets. (2018). Review of Economic Studies, 85, 396–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, K. (1938). Experimental modification of children’ food preferences through social suggestion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 33, 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. R. H., & Frewer, L. J. (2009). Consumer familiarity with foods and the perception of risks and benefits. Food Quality and Preference, 20, 576–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., Kaciroti, N., Russell, J. W., & Lumeng, J. C. (2012). I’ll have what she’s having: The impact of model characteristics on children’s food choices. Developmental Science, 15, 87–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer, L. J., Lassen, J., Kettlitz, B., Scholderer, J., Beekman, V., & Berdal, K. G. (2004). Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42, 1181–1193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galef, B. G., & Whiskin, E. E. (2000). Social influences on the amount of food eaten by Norway rats. Appetite, 34, 327–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golkar, A., Selbing, I., Flygare, O., Öhman, Am, & Olsson, A. (2013). Other people as means to a safe end: Vicarious extinction blocks the return of learned fear. Psychological Science, 24, 2182–2190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, J., Dowey, A. J., Horne, P. J., Lowe, C. F., Griffiths, J. H., & Whitaker, C. J. (2009). Positive and negative peer modelling effects on young children’s consumption of novel blue foods. Appetite, 52, 646–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J., Holm, L., Frewer, L., Robinson, P., & Sandoe, P. (2003). Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risk. Appetite, 41, 111–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, L. W., & Sanders, K. M. (1975). The effect of adults’ eating on young children’s acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 20, 206–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendy, H. M. (1999). Comparison of five teacher actions to encourage children’s new food acceptance. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 20–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hendy, H. M. (2002). Effectiveness of trained peer models to encourage food acceptance in preschool children. Appetite, 39, 217–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hendy, H. M., & Raudenbush, B. (2000). Effectiveness of teacher modeling to encourage food acceptance in preschool children. Appetite, 34, 61–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, R. C. J., Larsen, J. K., Herman, C. P., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2008). Modeling of palatable food intake in female young adults: Effects of perceived body size. Appetite, 51, 512–518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, R. C. J., Larsen, J. K., Herman, C. P., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2009). Effects of social modeling on young women’s nutrient-dense food intake. Appetite, 53, 135–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobden, K., & Pliner, P. (1995). Effects of a model on food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 25, 101–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horne, P. J., Tapper, K., Lowe, C. F., Hardman, C. A., Jackson, M. C., & Woolner, J. (2004). Increasing children’s fruit and vegetable consumption: A peer-modelling and rewards-based intervention. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 58, 1649–1660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration (IFSAC) Project. (2015). Foodborne illness source attribution estimates for Salmonella, Escherichia coli O157 (E. coli O157), Listeria monocytogenes (Lm), and Campylobacter using outbreak surveillance data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, B. (2000). Consumer perception and understanding of risk from food. British Medical Bulletin, 56, 97–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C. F., Horne, P. J., Tapper, K., Bowdery, M., & Egerton, C. (2004). Effects of a peer modelling and rewards-based intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in children. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 58, 510–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marinho, H. (1942). Social influence in the formation of enduring preferences. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 37, 448–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollen, S., Rimal, R. N., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2013). Healthy and unhealthy social norms and food selection. Findings from a field-experiment. Appetite, 65, 83–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelchat, M. L., & Pliner, P. (1995). Try it. You’ll like it. Effects of information on willingness to try novel foods. Appetite, 24, 153–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pliner, P. (1982). The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite, 3, 283–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pliner, P., Chaiken, S., & Flett, G. L. (1990). Gender differences in concern with eating, weight, and physical appearance over the lifespan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 19, 105–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pliner, P., & Pelchat, M. (1991). Neophobia in humans and the special status of foods of animal origin. Appetite, 16, 205–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pliner, P., Pelchat, M., & Grabski, M. (1993). Reduction of neophobia in humans by exposure to novel foods. Appetite, 20, 111–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pliner, P., & Stallberg-White, C. (2000). “Pass the ketchup, please”: Familiar flavors increase children’s willingness to taste novel foods. Appetite, 34, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinsen, S., de Ridder, D. T. D., & de Vet, E. (2013). Eating by example. Effects of environmental cues on dietary decisions. Appetite, 70, 1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rather, I. A., Koh, W. Y., Paek, W. K., & Lim, J. (2017). The sources of chemical contaminants in food and their health implications. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 8, Article number: 830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, M., Grover, C. A., & Davis, S. F. (1987). Galef’s transfer-of-information effect occurs in a free-foraging situation. The Psychological Record, 37, 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberto, C. A., Baik, J., Harris, J. L., & Brownell, K. D. (2010). Influence of licensed characters on children’s taste and snack preferences. Pediatrics, 126, 88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E., Fleming, A., & Higgs, S. (2014). Prompting healthier eating: Testing the use of health and social norm based messages. Health Psychology, 33, 1057–1064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E., Harris, E., Thomas, J., Aveyard, P., & Higgs, S. (2013). Reducing high calorie snack food in young adults: A role for social norms and health based messages. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10, 73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E., & Higgs, S. (2013). Food choices in the presence of “healthy” and “unhealthy” eating partners. British Journal of Nutrition, 109, 765–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronteltap, A., van Trijp, J. C. M., Renes, R. J., & Frewer, L. J. (2007). Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite, 49, 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, D. A. (1999). The influence of norms on eating behavior: An impression management approach. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, E. (1973). The flavor principle cookbook. New York: Hawthorne Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, E., & Rozin, P. (1981). Culinary themes and variations. Natural History, 90, 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., & Vollmecke, T. A. (1986). Food likes and dislikes. Annual Review of Nutrition, 6, 433–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, L. D., & Wuyek, L. A. (2005). Vicarious extinction. In M. Hersen (Ed.), Encyclopedia of behavior modification and cognitive behavior therapy: Vol. 3: Educational applications (pp. 1085–1086). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinaceur, M., Heath, C., & Cole, S. (2005). Emotional and deliberative reactions to a public crisis—Mad Cow disease in France. Psychological Science, 3, 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staiano, A. E., Marker, A. M., Frelier, J. M., Hsia, D. S., & Martin, C. K. (2016). Influence of screen-based peer modeling on preschool children’s vegetable consumption and preferences. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 45, 331–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stallberg-White, C., & Pliner, P. (1999). The effects of flavor principles on willingness to accept novel foods. Appetite, 33, 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stok, F. M., De Ridder, D. T. D., De Vet, E., & De Wit, J. B. F. (2012). Minority talks: The influence of descriptive social norms on fruit intake. Psychology & Health, 27, 956–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stok, F. M., de Ridder, D. T. D., de Vet, E., & de Wit, F. B. F. (2014). Don’t tell me what I should do, but what others do: The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on fruit consumption in adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 52–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stok, F. M., de Vet, E., de Ridder, D. T. D., & de Wit, J. B. F. (2016). The potential of peer social norms to shape food intake in adolescents and young adults: A systematic review of effects and moderators. Health Psychology Review, 10, 326–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stok, F. M., de Vet, E., deWit, J. B. F., Renner, B., & de Ridder, D. T. D. (2015). Communicating eating-related rules. Suggestions are more effective than restrictions. Appetite, 86, 45–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strupp, B. J., & Levitsky, D. A. (1984). Social transmission of food preferences in adult hooded rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 98, 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szpunar, K., Schellenberg, G., & Pliner, P. (2004). The effects of repeated exposure and attention on preference and recognition for music. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning and Memory, 30, 370–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Peter Herman .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Herman, C.P., Polivy, J., Pliner, P., Vartanian, L.R. (2019). Modeling of Food Choice. In: Social Influences on Eating. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28817-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics