Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of five teacher actions to encourage children's new food acceptance

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

How can teachers encourage children to accept new fruits and vegetables? A quasi-experimental study with 64 preschool children (32 boys, 32 girls) compared the effectiveness of five teacher actions to encourage children's acceptance of four new fruits and vegetables presented during three preschool lunches. The five teacher actions included reward (special dessert), modeling, insisting children try one bite, choice-offering (“Do you want any of this?”), and a control condition of simple exposure.

In factorial analyses of variance (two genders × five teacher actions), the five teacher actions produced differences in number of foods sampled (p<.001), number of meals during which foods were sampled (p<.004), and total number of bites (p<.002). Paired comparisons revealed that reward, insisting, and choice-offering were more effective than simple exposure to encourage number of foods, number of meals, and number of bites. Dessert reward and choice-offering were equally effective for all three measures of new food acceptance, but insisting produced fewer bites than did choice-offering. Under the present conditions, teacher modeling was ineffective compared to simple exposure. No gender differences were found in new food acceptance or in interactions with the five teacher actions to encourage new food acceptance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brozek J (ed):Malnutrition and Human Behavior: Experimental, Clinical, and Community Studies. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conners CK:Feeding the Brain: How Foods Affect Children. New York: Plenum. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pipes PL (ed).Nutrition in Infancy and Childhood. St. Louis, MO: Times Mirror/Mosby, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Research Council:Diet and Health. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. United States Department of Health and Human Services:Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC: Public Health Service, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cashdan E: A sensitive period for learning about food.Human Nature. 1994,5:279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Illingworth RS, Lister J: The critical or sensitive period, with special reference to certain feeding problems in infants and children.Journal of Pediatrics. 1964,65:839–848.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Achterberg CA: A perspective on nutrition education research and practice.Journal of Nutrition Education. 1988,20:240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hayghe H: Employers and child care: What roles do they play?Monthly Labor Review. 1988,111:38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wright DE, Radcliffe JD: Parents' perceptions of influences on food behavior development of children attending day care facilities.Journal of Nutrition Education. 1992,24:198–201.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Birch LL, McPhee L, Shoba BC, Steinberg L, Krehbiel R: “Clean up your plate”: Effects of child feeding practices on the development of intake regulation.Learning and Motivation. 1987,18:301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iannotti RJ, Bush PJ: The development of autonomy in children's health behaviors. In Susman EJ, Feagans LV, Ray WJ (eds),Emotion, Cognition, Health and Development in Children and Adolescents. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bandura A:Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bandura A:Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deci EL: The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In Renninger KA, Hidi S, Krapp A (eds),The Role of Interest in Learning and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992, 43–70.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deci EL, Ryan RM:Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Highberger R, Carothers L: Modification of eating behavior of toddlers in a day care setting.Home Economics Research Journal. 1977,6:48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ireton CL, Guthrie HA: Modification of vegetable eating behavior in preschool children.Journal of Nutritional Education. 1972,4:100–103.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stark LJ, Collins Jr. FL, Osnes PG, Stokes TF: Using reinforcement and cueing to increase healthy snack food choices in preschoolers.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1986,19:367–380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson Jr. RJ, Palmer S: Treatment of feeding problems: A behavioral approach.Journal of Nutritional Education. 1974,6: 63–66.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Birch LL, Birch D, Marlin D, Kramer L: Effects of instrumental eating on children's food preferences.Appetite. 1982,3:125–134.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Birch LL, Marlin DW, Rotter J: Eating as the “means” activity in a contingency: Effects on young children's food preferences.Child Development. 1984,55:431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Newman J, Taylor A: Effect of a means-end contingency on young children's food preferences.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1992,64:200–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Close SM, Sabry J: An experiment to influence vegetable acceptance of nursery school children.Journal of Canadian Dietetic Association. 1978,39:221–225.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rolls BJ, Rolls ET, Rowe EA: The influence of variety on human food selection and intake. In Barker LM (ed),The Psychobiology of Human Food Selection. Westport, CT: AVI, 1982 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boggiano AK, Main DS: Enhancing children's interest in activities used as rewards: The bonus effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986,51:1116–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dickenson AM: The detrimental effects of extrinsic reinforcement on “intrinsic motivation.”Behavior Analyst. 1989,12:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lepper MR: Social control processes and the internalization of social values: An attributional perspective. In Higgins ET, Ruble DN, Hartup WW (ed),Social Cognition and Social Development: A Sociocultural Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 294–330.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Newman J, Layton BD: Overjustification: A self-perception perspective.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1984,10:419–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Birch LL, McPhee L, Shoba BC, Pirok E, Steinberg L: What kind of exposure reduces children's food neophobia?Appetite. 1987,9:171–178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pliner P: The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances.Appetite. 1982,3:283–290.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bernstein IL, Meachum CL: Food aversion learning: Its impact on appetite. In Capaldi ED, Powley TL (eds),Taste, Experience, and Feeding. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1990, 170–178.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Birch LL, Zimmerman SI, Hind H: The influence of social-affective context on the formation of children's food preferences.Child Development. 1980,54:856–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fallon AE, Rozin P, Pliner P: The child's conception of food: The development of food rejections with special reference to disgust and contamination sensitivity.Child Development. 1984,55:566–575.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Logue AW, Ophir I, Strauss KE: The acquisition of taste aversions in humans.Behavior Research and Therapy. 1981,19:319–333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rozin P, Fallon AE: A perspective on disgust.Psychological Review. 1987,94:23–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sanders MR, Patel RK, Grice BL, Shepherd RW: Children with persistent feeding difficulties: An observational analysis of the feeding interactions of problem and non-problem eaters.Health Psychology. 1993,12:64–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dolan B, Gitzinger I (eds):Why Women? Gender Issues and Eating Disorders. London: Athlone Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Garner DM, Garfinkel PE, Schwartz D, Thompson M: Cultural expectations of thinness in women.Psychological Reports. 1988,47:483–491.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hsu LK: The gender gap in eating disorders: Why are the eating disorders more common among women?Clinical Psychology Review. 1989,9:393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rolls BJ, Fedoroff IC, Guthrie JF: Gender differences in eating behavior and body weight regulation.Health Psychology. 1991,10:133–142.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Reau NR, Senturia YD, Lebailly SA, Christoffel KK: Infant and toddler feeding patterns and problems: Normative data and a new direction.Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 17:149–153.

  43. McGrew WC:An Ethological Study of Children's Behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Birch LL: The control of food intake by young children: The role of learning. In Capaldi ED, Powley TL (eds),Taste, Experience, and Feeding. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1990, 116–135.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Eisenberger R, Cameron J: Detrimental effects of reward.American Psychologist. 1996,51:1153–1166.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Schunk DH: Peer models and children's behavioral change.Review of Educational Research. 198757:149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stellar E, Shrager EE: Chews and swallows and the microstructure of eating.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1985,42:973–982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Hanna E, Meltzoff AN: Peer imitation by toddlers in laboratory, home, and day-care contexts: Implications for social learning and memory.Developmental Psychology. 1992,29:701–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Abramovitch R, Grusec JE: Peer imitation in a natural setting.Child Development. 1978,49:60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Birch LL, Billman J: Preschool children's food-sharing with friends and acquaintances.Child Development. 1986,57:387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Striegel-Moore RH, Silberstein LR, Rodin J: Toward an understanding of risk factors for bulimia.American Psychologist. 1986,41:246–263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Thelen MH, Lawrence CM, Powell AL: Body image, weight control, and eating disorders among children. In Crowther JH, Tennenbaum DL, Hobfoll SE, Stepens MAP (eds),The Etiology of Bulimia Nervosa: The Individual and Familial Context. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1992, 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Krasnegor NA, Epstein L, Johsnson SB, Yaffe SJ (eds):Developmental Aspects of Health Compliance Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Harper KU, Sanders KM: The effect of adults' eating on young children's acceptance of unfamiliar foods.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 1975,20:206–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Agras WS, Berkowitz RI, Hammer LC, Kraemer HC: Relationships between the eating behaviors of parents and their eighteen-month-old children: A laboratory study.International Journal of Eating Disorders. 1988,7:461–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Contento IR, Basch C, Shea S, et al: Relationship of mother's food choice criteria to food intake of preschool children: Identification of family subgroups.Health Education Quarterly. 1993,20:243–259.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Tinsley BJ: Multiple influences on the acquisition and socialization of children's health attitudes and behavior: An integrative review.Child Development. 1992,63:1043–1069.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Falciglia GA, Norton PA: Evidence for a genetic influence on preference for some foods.Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1994,94:154–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. LaDu Jr. BN: The role of genetics in idiosyncratic reactions or adverse reactions to foods. In Simopoulos AP, Childs B (eds),Genetic Variation and Nutrition (Volume 63): World Review of Nutrition and Diet. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1990, 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rowe DC:The Limits of Family Influence—Genes, Experience, and Behavior. New York: Guilford, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Davis C: Results of the self-selection of diets by young children.Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1939,41:257–261.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Klesges RC, Coates TJ, Brown G, et al: Parental influences on children's eating behavior and relative weight.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1983,16:371–378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Penn State Schuylkill, Capital College, 200 University Drive, 17972, Schuylkill Haven, PA

    Helen M. Hendy

  2. Penn State University, PA, USA

    Helen M. Hendy

Authors
  1. Helen M. Hendy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by Small Grants and the Research Assistant Program of Penn State Schuylkill.

Dorothy Franks and Lynn Measel from Schuylkill Child Development, PA, assisted with participant recruitment. Robin Cresswell, Helen Frehafer, Margaret Greco, Kathy Hunter, Rebecca Keen, Brook Koch, Sheree Minnich, Danille Sauerwine, and Jennifer Thomas served as observers. Mandy Fitzpatrick, Charles Foster, and Janett Naylor helped with food preparation. Bryan Raudenbush provided critical commentary on the manuscript. Thanks are also given to the children, teachers, and staff of the preschools of Schuylkill Child Development, PA.

About this article

Cite this article

Hendy, H.M. Comparison of five teacher actions to encourage children's new food acceptance. ann. behav. med. 21, 20–26 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895029

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895029

Keywords

Search

Navigation