Abstract
This chapter discusses the methods of applying both the data envelopment analysis (DEA) and fuzzy set/qualitative comparative analysis (fs/QCA) in tourism research. Unlike conventional quantitative methods in social sciences, research such as system of regression and multivariate procedures are mostly based on frequency and consistency thresholds. The basis of fuzzy set analysis is the fact that there is no “single correct answer”. Indeed, fuzzy sets fill the gap between qualitative and quantitative methods of measurement, and QCA is one of the few methods that cover “limited diversity”. This method addresses the shortcoming of most traditional methods which presume that causal conditions are “independent” constructs and the impact on the outcome variable are both additive and linear. In addition, DEA is a nonparametric quantitative data analysis method that is used to examine the relationship between inputs to a production process and the outputs of that process. It acts as a mathematical programming technique to develop and provide the best possible solutions. This chapter shows that application of fuzzy set/QCA (fs/QCA) and DEA method in Asian tourism research would yield a fruitful contribution to the literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benito, B., Solana, J., & López, P. (2014). Determinants of Spanish regions’ tourism performance: A two-stage, double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis. Tourism Economics, 20(5), 987–1012.
Berg, S. (2010). Water utility benchmarking: Measurement. Methodology and performance incentives. London: IWA Publishing.
Bihamta, H., Jayashree, S., Rezaei, S., Okumus, F., & Rahimi, R. (2017). Dual pillars of hotel restaurant food quality satisfaction and brand loyalty. British Food Journal, 119(12), 2597–2609. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2016-0344.
Brady, H. E. (2002). Models of causal inference: Going beyond the Neyman-Rubin-Holland theory. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Political Methodology Group.
Braumoeller, B. F. (2017). Causal complexity and the study of politics. Political Analysis, 11(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpg012.
Brockett, P. L., & Golany, B. (1996). Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 42(3), 466–472.
Brown, J. R., & Ragsdale, C. T. (2002). The competitive market efficiency of hotel brands: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 26(4), 332–360.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
Dabestani, R., Shahin, A., Saljoughian, M., & Shirouyehzad, H. (2016). Importance-performance analysis of service quality dimensions for the customer groups segmented by DEA: The case of four star hotels. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(2), 160–177.
Donthu, N., Hershberger, E. K., & Osmonbekov, T. (2005). Benchmarking marketing productivity using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business Research, 58(11), 1474–1482.
Fearon, J. D. (1991). Counterfactuals and hypothesis testing in political science. World Politics, 43(02), 169–195.
Fiss, P. C., Marx, A., & Cambré, B. (2013). Configurational theory and methods in organizational research: Introduction. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 38, 1–22.
Horsten, L., & Weber, E. (2014). INUS conditions. In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics reference online. Hoboken: Wiley.
Hwang, S.-N., & Chang, T.-Y. (2003). Using data envelopment analysis to measure hotel managerial efficiency change in Taiwan. Tourism Management, 24(4), 357–369.
Köksal, C. D., & Aksu, A. A. (2007). Efficiency evaluation of A-group travel agencies with data envelopment analysis (DEA): A case study in the Antalya region, Turkey. Tourism Management, 28(3), 830–834.
Liu, D. (2016). Measuring aeronautical service efficiency and commercial service efficiency of East Asia airport companies: An application of network data envelopment analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management, 52, 11–22.
Mohseni, S., Jayashree, S., Rezaei, S., Kasim, A., & Okumus, F. (2018). Attracting tourists to travel companies’ websites: The structural relationship between website brand, personal value, shopping experience, perceived risk and purchase intention. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(6), 616–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1200539.
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Oakland: University of California Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2003). Recent advances in fuzzy-set methods and their application to policy questions. http://www.compasss.org/Ragin2003.pdf
Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310.
Ragin, C. (2007a). Chapter 5: Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). Forthcoming in N. Rihoux, & C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative analysis, London: Sage Publications.
Ragin, C. C. (2007b). Fuzzy sets: Calibration versus measurement. In D. Collier, H. Brady, & J. M. Box-Steffensmeier (Eds.), Methodology: Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ragin, C. C., & Sonnett, J. (2005). Between complexity and parsimony: Limited diversity, counterfactual cases, and comparative analysis. In Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft (pp. 180–197). Heidelberg: Springer.
Ragin, C. C., Rubinson, C., Schaefer, D., Anderson, S., Williams, E., & Giesel, H. (2008). User’s guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis. University of Arizona, p. 87.
Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M., & Contreras, I. (2017). Efficiency of travel agency franchises: A study in Spain. Service Business, 11(4), 717–739.
Reynolds, D., & Thompson, G. M. (2007). Multiunit restaurant productivity assessment using three-phase data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26(1), 20–32.
Rezaei, S., & Valaei, N. (2017a). Branding in a multichannel retail environment: Online stores vs app stores and the effect of product type. Information Technology and People, 30(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-12-2015-0308.
Rezaei, S., & Valaei, N. (2017b). Crafting experiential value via smartphone apps channel. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 35(5), 688–702. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-08-2016-0141.
Rezaei, S., Ali, F., Amin, M., & Jayashree, S. (2016). Online impulse buying of tourism products: The role of web site personality, utilitarian and hedonic web browsing. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 7(1), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-03-2015-0018.
Rezaei, S., Mazaheri, E., & Azadavar, R. (2017). Determinants of experienced tourists’ satisfaction and actual spending behavior: A PLS path modelling approach. International Journal of Culture, Tourism, and Hospitality Research, 11(2), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-09-2015-0107.
Rezaei, S., Shahijan, M. K., Valaei, N., Rahimi, R., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2018). Experienced international business traveller’s behaviour in Iran: A partial least squares path modelling analysis. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 18(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358416636930.
Rich, S. R. (2013). Handbook of research methods in tourism: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 11(1–2), 135–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2013.764112.
Rotoli, F., Cawood, E. N., & Christidis, P. (2015). A data envelopment analysis approach for accessibility measures: Simulating operational enhancement scenarios for railway across Europe. European Transport Research Review, 7(2), 18.
Shahijan, M. K., Rezaei, S., Preece, C. N., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2015). International medical travelers’ behavioral intention: An empirical study in Iran. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 32(5), 475–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2014.916248.
Valaei, N., Rezaei, S., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2017). Examining learning strategies, creativity, and innovation at SMEs using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis and PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, 70, 224–233.
Woodside, A. G. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463–472.
Woodside, A. G. (2014). Embrace• perform• model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495–2503.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Valaei, N., Rezaei, S., Ho, R.C., Okumus, F. (2019). Beyond Structural Equation Modelling in Tourism Research: Fuzzy Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fs/QCA) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In: Rezaei, S. (eds) Quantitative Tourism Research in Asia. Perspectives on Asian Tourism. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2463-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2463-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2462-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2463-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)