Skip to main content

Stackelberg Routing in Arbitrary Networks

  • Conference paper
Internet and Network Economics (WINE 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5385))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We investigate the impact of Stackelberg routing to reduce the price of anarchy in network routing games. In this setting, an α fraction of the entire demand is first routed centrally according to a predefined Stackelberg strategy and the remaining demand is then routed selfishly by (nonatomic) players. Although several advances have been made recently in proving that Stackelberg routing can in fact significantly reduce the price of anarchy for certain network topologies, the central question of whether this holds true in general is still open. We answer this question negatively. We prove that the price of anarchy achievable via Stackelberg routing can be unbounded even for single-commodity networks. In light of this negative result, we consider bicriteria bounds. We develop an efficiently computable Stackelberg strategy that induces a flow whose cost is at most the cost of an optimal flow with respect to demands scaled by a factor of \(1 + \sqrt{1-\alpha}\). Finally, we analyze the effectiveness of an easy-to-implement Stackelberg strategy, called SCALE. We prove bounds for a general class of latency functions that includes polynomial latency functions as a special case. Our analysis is based on an approach which is simple, yet powerful enough to obtain (almost) tight bounds for SCALE in general networks.

This work was supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Babaioff, M., Kleinberg, R., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Congestion games with malicious players. In: Proc. of the 8th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce, pp. 103–112 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Braess, D.: Über ein Paradoxon der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmenforschung 11, 258–268 (1968)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Correa, J.R., Schulz, A.S., Stier-Moses, N.E.: Selfish routing in capacitated networks. Mathematics of Operations Research 29, 961–976 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Correa, J.R., Schulz, A.S., Stier-Moses, N.E.: On the inefficiency of equilibria in congestion games. In: Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, pp. 167–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Correa, J.R., Stier-Moses, N.E.: Stackelberg routing in atomic network games. Technical report, Columbia Business School (February 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dafermos, S., Sparrow, F.: The traffic assignment problem for a general network. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Series B 73, 91–118 (1969)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubey, P.: Inefficiency of Nash equilibria. Mathematics of Operations Research 11, 1–8 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fotakis, D.: Stackelberg strategies for atomic congestion games. In: Proc. of the 15th European Symp. on Algorithms, pp. 299–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harks, T.: Stackelberg strategies and collusion in network games with splittable flow. In: Proc. of the 6th Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms (WAOA). Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaporis, A., Spirakis, P.: The price of optimum in Stackelberg games on arbitrary single commodity networks and latency functions. In: Proc. of the 18th ACM Symp. on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, pp. 19–28. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karakostas, G., Kolliopoulos, S.G.: Stackelberg strategies for selfish routing in general multicommodity networks. Algorithmica (to appear, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Korilis, Y.A., Lazar, A.A., Orda, A.: Achieving network optima using Stackelberg routing strategies. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 5(1), 161–173 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Worst-case equilibria. In: Meines, C., Tison, S. (eds.) Proc. of the 16th Symp. on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar, V.S.A., Marathe, M.V.: Improved results for Stackelberg scheduling strategies. In: Proc. of the 33rd Int. Colloquium of Automata, Languages and Programming, pp. 776–787. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Perakis, G.: The price of anarchy when costs are non-separable and asymmetric. In: Proc. of the 10th Int. Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, pp. 46–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Roughgarden, T.: The price of anarchy is independent of the network topology. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 67, 341–364 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Roughgarden, T.: Selfish Routing. PhD thesis, Cornell University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roughgarden, T.: Stackelberg scheduling strategies. SIAM Journal on Computing 33(2), 332–350 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Roughgarden, T.: Selfish Routing and the Price of Anarchy. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Roughgarden, T.: On the severity of Braess’s paradox: Designing networks for selfish users is hard. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 72(5), 922–953 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E.: How bad is selfish routing? Journal of the ACM 49(2), 236–259 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharma, Y., Williamson, D.: Stackelberg thresholds in network routing games or the value of altruism. In: Proc. of the 8th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce, pp. 93–102 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Swamy, C.: The effectiveness of Stackelberg strategies and tolls for network congestion games. In: Proc. of the 18th ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1133–1142. SIAM, Philadelphia (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bonifaci, V., Harks, T., Schäfer, G. (2008). Stackelberg Routing in Arbitrary Networks . In: Papadimitriou, C., Zhang, S. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5385. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92185-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92185-1_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92184-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92185-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics