Skip to main content

Improved Results for Stackelberg Scheduling Strategies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2380))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We continue the study initiated in [13] on Stackelberg Scheduling Strategies. We are given a set of m independent parallel machines or equivalently a set of m parallel edges, each with a load dependent latency function. The setting is that of a non-cooperative game: players route their flow so as minimize their individual latencies. Additionally, there is a single player (the leader), who controls an α fraction of the total flow. The goal is to find a strategy for the leader (i.e. an assignment of flow to individual links) such that the selfish users react so as to minimize the total latency of the system. Building on the recent results in [13,14], we devise a fully polynomial approximate Stackelberg scheme that runs in time poly(m, 1/) and results in an assignment whose cost is within a (1 + ) factor of the optimum Stackelberg strategy. We also study the generalization to multiple rounds. It is easy to see that more than two rounds do not help. We show that the two round Stackelberg strategy (denoted 2SS) always dominates the one round scheme. We also consider extensions of the above results to special graphs, and special kind of latency functions.

Work supported by the Department of Energy under Contract W-7405-ENG-36.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Beckman, C. Mcguire and C. Winstein. Studies in the Economics of Transportation. Yale University Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Bennett, C. Partridge and N. Shectman. “Packet reordering is not Pathological Network Behavior,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 7(6), Dec. 1999, pp. 789–798.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Carrahan, P. Russo, K. Kitami and R. Kung. Intelligent Network Overview. IEEE Communications Magzine, 31, pp. 30–36, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Cocchi, S. Shenker, D. Estrin and L. Zhang. Pricing in Computer Networks: Motivation, Formulation and Example. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. 1(6), pp. 614–627, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. O’Connell, and R. Stearns. Polynomial Time Mechanisms for Collective Decision Making. Game Theory and Decision Theory in Agent-Based Systems. S. Parsons, P. Gmytrasiewicz, P. and M. Wooldridge, (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Deering and R. Hinden. Internet Protocol Version 6 Specification. Internet Draft IETF March 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Dafermos and F. Sparrow. The Traffic Assignment Problem for a General Network. J. Research of the National Bureau of Standards Series B. 73B(2), pp. 91–118, 1969.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Korillis, A. Lazar and A. Orda. Achieving Network Optima Using Stackelberg Routing Strategies. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. 5(1), pp. 161–173, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Koutsoupias and C. Papadimitriou. Worst-Case Equilibria. Proc. 16th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS), pp. 403–413, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Korillis, A. Lazar and A. Orda. Capacity Allocation Under Non-cooperative Routing. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 42(3), pp. 309–325, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Nisan and A. Ronen. Algorithmic Mechanism Design. Proc. 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). pp. 129–140, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Papadimitriou. Algorithms, games and the Internet. Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. pp. 749–753, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Roughgarden. Stackelberg Scheduling Strategies. Proc. 31st ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). pp. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. Roughgarden and E. Tardos. How bad is Selfish Routing. Proc. 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. pp. 93–102, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Saraydar, N. Mandayam and D. Goodman. Efficient Power Control via Pricing in Wireless Data Networks To Appear in IEEE Trans. on Communications, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. http://www.lanl.gov/orgs/d/d5/projects/MESA/mesa.html http://www.lanl.gov/orgs/d/d2/projects.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kumar, V.S.A., Marathe, M.V. (2002). Improved Results for Stackelberg Scheduling Strategies. In: Widmayer, P., Eidenbenz, S., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Conejo, R., Hennessy, M. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2380. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45465-9_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45465-9_66

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43864-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45465-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics