Abstract
Quality assessment is an important way to measure care and to effect change. The methods used vary from hospital to hospital and from small group practices to large healthcare practices like Kaiser Permanente (KP). Kaiser Permanente is an integrated healthcare delivery system that provides inpatient and outpatient care and is currently the largest managed care organization in the United States covering over 11.8 million members in eight states and the District of Columbia. With the introduction of the electronic health record (EHR) system in 2006, KP has been able to leverage the data collected to develop unique methods for assessing the quality of our clinical practices. For spinal care, KP has developed the KP spine registry which collects data on patient safety, spinal implant performance, and clinical outcomes. Added information on cost-effectiveness adds value to our quality measures. The most critical components after determining quality, however, is to implement a dynamic feedback mechanism in which changes in clinical practices can occur and can be shared throughout the entire organization. This chapter explores the different methods used by Kaiser Permanente to assess the quality of our spine care and implement changes in our clinical practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Debly T, Stewart J. The story of Dr. Sidney R. Garfield: the visionary who turned sick care into health care. Oakland: The Permanente Press; 2009.
Paxton EW, Inacio CS, Khatod M, Yue EJ, Namba RS. Kaiser Permanente national total joint replacement registry: aligning operations with information technology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2646–63.
Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, editors. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide [monograph on the Internet]. (Prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc dba Outcome] under Contract No. HHSA29020050035ITO1.) AHRQ Publication No. 07-EHC001-1. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007 Apr [cited 2012 May 8]. Available from: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/repFiles/PatOutcomes.pdf
Paxton EW, Inacio MC, Kiley ML. The Kaiser Permanente implant registries: effect on patient safety, quality improvement, cost effectiveness, and research opportunities. Perm J. 2012;16(2):36–44.
Paxton EW, Kiley ML, Love R, Barber TC, Funahashi TT, Inacio MC. Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39(6):246–52.
Guppy K, Paxton L, Harris J, Alvarez J, Bernbeck J. Does bone morphogenetic protein change the operative nonunion rates in spine fusions? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;15:1831–9.
Boden SD, Zdeblick TA, Sandhu HS, et al. The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: a preliminary report. Spine. 2000;25:376–81.
Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Dickman CA, et al. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15:337–49.
Guppy KH, Harris J, Chen J, Paxton EW, Alvarez J, Bernbeck J. Reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in posterior cervical (subaxial) fusions with and without bone morphogenetic protein in a cohort of 1158 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24:556–64.
Guppy KH, Harris J, Chen J, Paxton EW, Bernbeck JA. Reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in posterior cervicothoracic fusions with and without bone morphogenetic protein in a cohort of 450 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25:309–17.
Bains R, Mitsunaga L, Kardile M, Chen Y, Guppy K, Harris J, Paxton E. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-2) usage and cancer correlation: an analysis of 10,416 spine fusion patients from a multi-center spine registry. J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Sep;43:214–9.
Guppy KH, Harris J, Paxton LW, Alvarez JL, Bernbeck JA. Reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in anterior cervical fusions from a national spine registry. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1632–7.
Akins PT, Harris J, Alvarez JL, Chen Y, Paxton EW, Bernbeck J, Guppy KH. Risk factors associated with 30-day readmissions after instrumented spine surgery in 14,939 patients: 30-day readmissions after instrumented spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(13):1022–32.
Flippin M, Harris J, Paxton EW, Prentice HA, Fithian DC, Ward SR, Gombatto SP. Effect of body mass index on patient outcomes of surgical intervention for the lumbar spine. J Spine Surg. 2017;3(3):349–57.
Bains RS, Kardile M, Mitsunaga L, Chen Y, Harris J, Paxton E, Majid K. Does chronic kidney disease affect the mortality rate in patients undergoing spine surgery? J Clin Neurosci. 2017;43:208–13.
Khatod M, et al. Pulmonary embolism prophylaxis in more than 30,000 total knee arthroplasty patients: is there a best choice? J Arthroplast. 2012;27(2):167–72.
Namba RS, Inacio MC, Paxton EW. Risk factors associated with surgical site infection in 30,491 primary total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(10):1330–8.
Khatod M, et al. Prophylaxis against pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(19):1767–72.
United States. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Home Medical Device Safety Communications, Public Health Notifications (Medical Devices) – FDA public health notification: life-threatening complications associated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein in cervical spine fusion. Silver Spring: 2008. https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/
Ohno T. Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. New York: Productivity Press; 1988.
Bendell T. A review and comparison of Six Sigma and the Lean organizations. TQM Mag. 2006;18(3):255Y262.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guppy, K.H., Harris, J., Bernbeck, J.A., Brara, H.S. (2019). Impact of Quality Assessment on Clinical Practice, Kaiser Permanente. In: Ratliff, J., Albert, T., Cheng, J., Knightly, J. (eds) Quality Spine Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97990-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97990-8_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97989-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97990-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)