Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Forest Management for Insects: Issues and Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Forests and Insect Conservation in Australia

  • 358 Accesses

Abstract

The complexities of forest insects and their needs present complicated scenarios for their effective conservation, whether efforts are directed to single species or wider communities. Forest management can hamper or support practical insect conservation in many ways, and some of the major themes and issues are outlined in this chapter, with examples of how they may contribute to wider perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamski P, Bohdan A, Michalcewicz J, Ciach M, Witkowski Z (2016) Timber stacks: potential ecological traps for an endangered saproxylic beetle, the Rosalia longicorn Rosalia alpina. J Insect Conserv 20:1099–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew N, Rodgerson L, York A (2000) Frequent fuel-reduction burning: the role of logs and associated leaf litter in the conservation of ant biodiversity. Austral Ecol 25:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton LA, Odell EH, Burwell CJ, Maunsell SC, Nakamura A, Mcdonald WJF, Kitching RL (2016) Altitudinal patterns of moth diversity in tropical and subtropical Australian rainforests. Aust Ecol 41:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athayde EA, Cancian LF, Verdade LM, Morellato LPC (2015) Functional and phylogenetic diversity of scattered trees in an agricultural landscape: implications for conservation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 199:272–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker SC, Richardson AMM, Seeman OD, Barmuta LA (2004) Does clearfell, burn and sow silviculture mimic the effect of wildfire? A field study and review using litter beetles. For Ecol Manag 199:433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks JCG, Brack CL (2003) Canberra’s urban forest: evolution and planning for future landscapes. Urb For Urb Green 1:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazelet CS, Samways MJ (2011) Grasshopper assemblage response to conservation ecological networks in a timber plantation matrix. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg SA, Bergman K-O, Wissman J, Zmihorski M, Ockinger E (2016) Power-line corridors as source habitats for butterflies in forest landscapes. Biol Conserv 201:320–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bojorquez-Tapia LA, Brower LP, Castilleja G, Sanchez-Colon S, Hernandez M et al (2003) Mapping expert knowledge: redesigning the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve. Conserv Biol 17:367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossart JL, Antwi JB (2016) Limited erosion of genetic and species diversity from small forest patches: sacred forest groves in an Afrotropical biodiversity hotspot have high conservation value for butterflies. Biol Conserv 198: 122–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouget C, Larrieu L, Brin A (2014) Key features for saproxylic beetle diversity derived from rapid habitat assessment in temperate forests. Ecol Indic 36:656–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpaneto GM, Mazziotta A, Coletti G, Luiselli L, Audisio P (2010) Conflict between insect conservation and public safety: the case of a saproxylic beetle (Osmoderma eremita) in urban parks. J Insect Conserv 14:555–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2009) Year in review 2009. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiari A, Bardiani M, Zauki A, Hardersen S, Mason F, Spada L, Campanaro A (2013) Monitoring of the saproxylic beetle Morimus asper (Sulzer, 1776) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) with freshly cut log piles. J Insect Conserv 17:1255–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinellato F, Faccoli M, Marini L, Battisti A (2014) Distribution of Norway spruce bark and wood-boring beetles along Alpine elevational gradients. Agric For Entomol 16:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello SL, Negron JF, Jacobi WR (2011) Wood-boring insect abundance in fire-injured ponderosa pine. Agric For Entomol 13:373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft P, Hunter JT, Reid N (2016) Forgotten fauna: habitat attributes of long-unburnt forests and woodlands dictate a rethink of fire management theory and practice. For Ecol Manag 366:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KF, Margules CR (1998) Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabid beetles: experimental evidence. J Anim Ecol 67:460–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies KF, Melbourne BA, Margules CR (2001) Effects of within- and between-patch processes on community dynamics in a fragmentation experiment. Ecology 82:1830–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Andrade RB, Balch JK, Carreira JYO, Brando PM, Freitas AVL (2017) The impacts of recurrent fires on diversity of fruit-feeding butterflies in a South-Eastern Amazon forest. J Trop Ecol 33:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N (2013) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories including IUCN WCPA best practice guidance on recognised protected areas and assigning management categories and governance types. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. (Available from https;//portrals.iucn.org/library/node/30018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmilo BJ, Nimmo DG, Morgan JW (2013) Pine plantations modify local conditions in forest fragments in southeastern Australia: insights from a fragmentation experiment. For Ecol Manag 305:264–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayle TM, Edwards DP, Foster WA, Yusah KM, Turner EC (2015) An ant-plant by-product mutualism is robust to selective logging of rain forest and conversion to oil palm plantation. Oecologia 178:441–450

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF, Berg DR, Thornburgh DA, Tappeiner JC (1997) Alternative sylvicultural systems to timber harvesting: variable retention harvest systems. In Kohm K, Franklin JF (eds) Creating a forestry for the 21st century. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 111–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman B, Zelazny V, Beaudette D, Fleming T, Johnson G et al (1996) Biodiversity implications of changes in the quality of dead organic matter in managed forests. Environ Revs 4:238–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentealba A, Pureswaran D, Bauce E, Depland E (2017) How does synchrony with host plant affect the performance of an outbreakng insect defoliator? Oecologia 184:847–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi KJM, Spence JR, Langor DW, Morgantini LE (2004) Fire residuals as habitat reserves for epigaeic beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Staphylinidae). Biol Conserv 102:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaublomme E, Hendrickx F, Dhuyvetter H, Desender K (2008) The effects of forest patch size and matrix type on changes in carabid beetle assemblages in an urbanized landscape. Biol Conserv 141:2585–2596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geldmann J, Barnes M, Coad L, Craigie ID, Hockings M, Burgess ND (2013) Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biol Conserv 161:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB (1996) Issues associated with the retention of hollow-bearing trees within eucalypt forests managed for wood production. For Ecol Manag 83:245–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough LA, Birkemoe T, Sverdrup-Thygeson A (2014) Reactive forest management can also be proactive for wood-living beetles in hollow oak trees. Biol Conserv 180:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouix N, Sebek P, Valladares L, Brustel H, Brin A (2015) Habitat requirements of the violet click beetle (Limoniscus violaceus), an endangered umbrella species of basal tree hollows. Insect Conserv Divers 8:418–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray CL, Slade EM, Mann DJ, Lewis OT (2014) Do riparian reserves support dung beetle biodiversity and ecosystem services in oil palm-dominated tropical landscapes? Ecol Evol 4:1049–1060

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson L, Kouki J, Sverdrup-Thygeson A (2010) Tree retention as a conservation measure in clear-cut forests of northern Europe: a review of ecological consequences. Scand J For Res 25:295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson L, Baker SC, Bauhaus J, Beese WJ, Brodie A et al (2012) Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: a world perspective. BioScience 62:633–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin J, Isacsson G, Jonsell M, Komonen A (2008) Forest fuel piles as ecological traps for saproxylic beetles in oak. Scand J For Res 23:348–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedwall P-O, Mikusinski G (2015) Structural changes in protected forests in Sweden: implications for conservation functionality. Can J For Res 45:1215–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkala O, Martikainen P, Kouki J (2017) Prescribed burning is an effective and quick method to conserve rare pyrophilous forest-dwelling flat bugs. Insect Conserv Divers 10:32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilszczanski J, Jaworski T, Plewa R, Jansson N (2014) Surrogate tree cavities: boxes with artificial substrate can serve as temporary habitat for Osmoderma barnabita (Motsch.) (Coleoptera, Cetoniinae). J Insect Conserv 18:855–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson ID (2005) Terrestrial insects along elevational gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biol Rev 80:489–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horak J (2011) Response of saproxylic beetles to tree species composition in a secondary urban forest area. Urb For Urb Green 10:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horak J (2017) Insect ecology and veteran trees. J Insect Conserv 21:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwona M, Marek P, Katarzyna W, Edwards B, Julia S (2017) Use of a genetically informed population viability analysis to evaluate management options for Polish populations of endangered beetle Cerambyx cerdo L. (1758) (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). J Insect Conserv 22:69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-0039-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson MA, Schwartzberg EG, Raffa KF, Reich PB, Lindroth RL (2015) Experimental climate warming alters aspen and birch phytochemistry and performance traits for an outbreak insect herbivore. Glob Change Biol 21:2698–2710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson N, Ranius T, Larsson A, Milberg P (2009) Boxes mimicking tree hollows can help conservation of saproxylic beetles. Biodivers Conserv 18:3891–3908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RHG, Pungetti G (2004) Ecological networks and greenways; concept, design, implementation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M (2012) Old park trees as habitat for saproxylic beetle species. Biodivers Conserv 21:619–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson N, Mendez M, Ranius T (2004) Nutrient richness of wood mould in tree hollows with the scarabaeid beetle Osmoderma eremita. Anim Biodiv Conserv 27:79–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung J-K, Lee SK, Lee S-I, Lee J-H (2018) Trait-specific response of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to forest fragmentation in the temperate region in Korea. Biodivers Conserv 27:53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazan ES (2014) Tests for biological corridor efficacy for conservation of a Neotropical giant damselfly. Biol Conserv 177:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiffney PM, Richardson JS, Bull JP (2003) Responses of periphyton and insects to experimental manipulation of riparian buffer width along forest streams. J Appl Ecol 40:1060–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching RL, Ashton LA (2014) Predictor sets and biodiversity assessments: the evolution and application of an idea. Pac Conserv Biol 19:418–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane J (1993) Overwintering monarch butterlies in California: past and present. In: Malcolm SB, Zalucki MP (eds) Biology and conservation of the monarch butterfly. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, pp 335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Langor DW, Hammond HEJ, Spence JR, Jacobs J, Cobb TP (2008) Saproxylic insect assemblages in Canadian forests: diversity, ecology, and conservation. Canad Entomol 140:453–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen TB (2005) The butterflies of West Africa. Apollo Books, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S-I, Spence JR, Langor DW (2017) Combinations of aggregated and dispersed retention improve conservation of saproxylic beetles in boreal white spruce stands. For Ecol Manag 385:116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB (2017) Conserving large old trees as small natural features. Biol Conserv 211:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Laurance WF (2017) The ecology, distribution, conservation and management of large old trees. Biol Rev 92:1434–1458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Claridge AW, Gilmore AM, Michael D, Lindenmayer BR (2002) The ecological roles of logs in Australian forests and the potential impacts of harvesting intensification on log-using biota. Pac Conserv Biol 8:121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Banks SC, Laurence WF, Franklin JF, Likens GE (2014) Broad decline of populations of large old trees. Conserv Lett 7:72–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Blair D, McBurney L, Banks SC (2015) The need for a comprehensive reassessment of the Regional Forest Agreements in Australia. Pac Conserv Biol 21:266–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzo-Delgado L, Lopez-Garcia J, Alcantara-Ayala I (2014) Role of forest conservation in lessening land degradation in a temperate region: the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. J Environ Manag 138: 55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Marczak LB, Sakamaki T, Turvey SL, Deguise I, Wood SLR, Richardson JS (2010) Are forested buffers an effective conservation strategy for riparian fauna? An assessment using meta-analysis. Ecol Appl 20:126–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR (1992) The Wog Wog habitat fragmentation experiment. Environ Conserv 19:316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen P (2001) Conservation of threatened saproxylic beetles: significance of retained aspen Populus tremula on clearcut areas. Ecol Bull 49:205–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen P, Kouki J, Heikalla O (2006) Effects of green tree retention and subsequent prescribed burning on the crown damage caused by the pine shoot beetles (Tomicus spp.) in pine-dominated timber harvest areas. Ecography 29:659–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matveinen-Huju K, Niemela J, Rita H, O’Hara RB (2006) Retention-tree groups in clear-cuts: do they constitute ‘life-boats’ for spiders and carabids? For Ecol Manag 230:119–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElhinny C, Gibbons P, Brack C, Bauhus J (2008) Fauna-habitat relationships: a basis for identifying key stand structural attributes in temperate Australian eucalypt forests and woodlands. Pac Conserv Biol 12:89–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mico E, Garcia-Lopez A, Sanchez A, Juarez M, Galante E (2015) What can physical, biotic and chemical features of a tree hollow tell us about their associated diversity? J Insect Conserv 19:141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshall GW (2003) Responses of stream benthic macroinvertebrates to fire. For Ecol Manag 178:155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monkkonen M, Mutanen M (2003) Occurrence of moths in boreal forest corridors. Conserv Biol 17:468–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraal LG, Jayers op Akkerhuis GAJM (2011) Changing patterns in insect pests on trees in the Netherlands since 1946 in relation to human induced habitat changes and climate factors – an analysis of historical data. For Ecol Manag 261:50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori AS, Kitagawa R (2014) Retention forestry as a major paradigm for safeguarding forest biodiversity in productive landscapes: a global meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 175:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New TR (2014) Insects, fire and conservation. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niemela J, Kotze J, Ashworth A, Brandmayr P, Desender K et al (2000) The search for common anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity, a global network J Insect Conserv 4:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto A, Alexander KNA (2010a) European red list of Saproxylic beetles. Publications office of the European union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto A, Alexander KNA (2010b) The status and conservation of saproxylic beetles in Europe. Cuademos de Biodiversidad (2010):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinto J, Marcos-Garcia MA, Diaz-Castelazo C, Rico-Gray V, Bustel H et al. (2012) Breaking down complex saproxylic communities: understanding sub-networks structure and implications to network robustness. PLoS ONE 7: e45062

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T, Jansson N (2000) The influence of forest regrowth, original canopy cover and tree size on saproxylic beetles associated with old oaks. Biol Conserv 95:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray R, Chandran MDS, Ramachandra TV (2014) Biodiversity and ecological assessments of Indian sacred groves. J For Res 25:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves GH, Bisson PA, Rieman BE, Benda LE (2006) Postfire logging in riparian areas. Conserv Biol 20:994–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roland J (1993) Large-scale forest fragmentation increases the duration of tent caterpillar outbreak. Oecologia 93:25–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenvald R, Lohmus A (2008) For what, when, and where is green-tree retention better than clear-cutting? A review of the biodiversity aspects. For Ecol Manag 255:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy S, Davison A, Ostberg J (2017) Pragmatic factors outweigh ecosystem service goals in street tree selection and planting in south-East Queensland cities. Urb For Urb Green 21:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin E, Schroeder LM (2010) Importance of habitat patch size for occupancy and density of aspen-associated saproxylic beetles. Biodivers Conserv 19:1325–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Germain M, Drapeau P, Hebert C (2004) Comparison of Coleoptera assemblages from a recently burned and unburned black spruce forest of northeastern North America. Biol Conserv 118:583–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (2007) Implementing ecological networks for conserving insects and other biodiversity. pp. 127–143 in Stewart AJA, New TR, Lewis OT (eds) Insect conservation biology. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauer B, Steinbauer MJ, Vailshery LS, Muller J, Feldhaar H, Obermaier E (2017) Influences of tree hollow characteristics on saproxylic beetle diversity in a managed forest. Biodivers Conserv 27:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt CB, Burgess ND, Coad L, Belokurov A, Besancon C et al (2009) Global analysis of the protection status of the world’s forests. Biol Conserv 142:2122–2130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmuki C, Vorburger C, Runciman D, Maceachern S, Sunnucks P (2006) When log-dwellers meet loggers: impacts of forest fragmentation on two endemic log-dwelling beetles in southeastern Australia. Molec Ecol 15:1481–1492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzberg EG, Jamieson MA, Raffa KF, Reich PB, Montgomery RA, Lindroth RL (2014) Simulated climate warming alters phenological synchrony between an outbreak insect herbivore and host trees. Oecologia 175:1041–1049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sebek P, Vodka A, Bogusch P, Pech P, Tropek R, Weiss M, Zimova K, Cizek L (2016) Open-grown trees as key habitats for arthropods in temperate woodlands: the diversity, composition, and conservation value of associated communities. For Ecol Manag 380:172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer CL (2015) Cautionary thoughts on IUCN protected area management categories V-VI. Glob Ecol Conserv 3:331–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabuddin G, Herzner GA, Aponter C, Gomez M del C (2000) Persistence of a frugivorous butterfly species in Venezuelan forest fragments: the role of movement and habitat quality. Biodivers Conserv 9:1623–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SE, Mendoza MG, Zuniga G, Halbrook K, Hayes JL, Byrne DN (2013) Predicting the distribution of a novel bark beetle and its pine hosts under future climate conditions. Agric For Entomol 15:212–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi NS, Wilcove DS, Subaraj R, Yong DL, Lee TM, Bernard H, Lim SLH (2010) Insect extinctions on a small denuded Bornean island. Biodivers Conserv 9:485–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speight MCD (1989) Saproxylic insects and their conservation. Nature and Environment Series no. 42, Council of Europe, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence JR, Langor D, Niemela J, Carcamo H, Currie C (1996) Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species. Ann Zool Fenn 33:173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer R-J, Baxter GS (2006) Effects of fire on the structure and composition of open eucalypt forests. Aust Ecol 31:638–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura S, Yamaura Y, Tsuru T, Goto H, Hasegawa M, Makihara H, Makino S (2009) Beetle responses to artificial gaps in an oceanic island forest: implications for invasive tree management to conserve endemic species diversity. Biodivers Conserv 18:2101–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Ims RA (2002) The effect of forest clearcutting in Norway on the community of saproxylic beetles on aspen. Biol Conserv 106:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Skarpaas O, Odegaard F (2010) Hollow oaks and beetle conservation: the significance of the surroundings. Biodivers Conserv 19:837–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Skarpas O, Blumentrath S, Birkemoe T, Evju M (2017) Habitat connectivity affects specialist species richness more than generalists in veteran trees. For Ecol Manag 403:96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh J (2004) Reflections of a scientist on the world parks congress. Conserv Biol 18:619–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson I, Potter C, Bayliss H (2015) Managing tree pests and diseases in urban settings: the case of Oak processionary moth in London, 2006-2012. Urb For Urb Green 14:286–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanha-Majamaa I, Jalonen J (2001) Green tree retention in Fennoscandian forestry. Scand J For Res 16(S3):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varkonyi G, Kuussaari M, Lappalainen H (2003) Use of forest corridors by boreal Xestia moths. Oecologia 137:466–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • York A (2000) Long-term effects of frequent low-intensity burning on ant communities in coastal blackbutt forests of southeastern Australia. Aust Ecol 25:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology, Environment & Evolution, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Tim R. New

Authors
  1. Tim R. New
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

New, T.R. (2018). Forest Management for Insects: Issues and Approaches. In: Forests and Insect Conservation in Australia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92222-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation