Skip to main content

State–Business Relations in China’s Changing Economic Order

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business, Government and Economic Institutions in China

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

This chapter seeks to characterize state–business relations in China by examining the polymorphous nature of the Chinese state and the rise of business as a hybrid actor. It begins with an assessment of existing concepts and approaches to the Chinese situation and argues that the forms of contention and the terms of exchange between state and business in China deviate from the existing categories of analysis. Seeing state–business relations in China as uniform or dominated by a specific form of interaction is a gross oversimplification. State–business relations are heterogeneous and not only vary across regions and sectors but are also “uneven” across different kinds of business actors within the same sector in a region. Our analysis underlines the micro-foundations of state–business relations in China. It argues that state–business relations are graded, in the sense that different types of business enjoy different degrees of closeness to the state and substates. Such differential closeness is determined, in general, by the ownership structures of business, the locations and scalar positions of the substates within the tiao–kuaihierarchy, and the strategies of substates and businesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., & Tan, H. (2005). Reform and restructuring in a Chinese state-owned enterprise: Sinotrans in the 1990s. Management International Review, 45(2), 147–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (2007). From government decentralization to decentralized governance. In G. Shabbira Cheema & D. A. Rondinelli (Eds.), Decentralizing governance: Emerging concepts and practices (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien, S.-S., & Gordon, I. (2008). Territorial competition in China and the West. Regional Studies, 42(1), 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, B. J. (2003). Red capitalists in China: The party, private entrepreneurs, and prospects for political change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckett, J. (2001). Bureaucrats in business, Chinese-style: The lessons of market reform and state entrepreneurialism in the People’s Republic of China. World Development, 29(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S., Maxfield, S., & Schneider, B. R. (1997). Theories of business and business-state relations. In S. Maxfield & B. R. Schneider (Eds.), Business and the state in developing countries (pp. 36–60). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. (2006). Reflections on the Chinese state. Development and Change, 37(2), 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, E., & Ngo, T.-W. (2015). Parallel trade in the Pearl River delta region. Paper presented to the International Workshop on Cross-border Exchanges and the Shadow Economy, Leiden, 14–15 December 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchcroft, P. D. (1991). Oligarchs and cronies in the Philippine state: The politics of patrimonial plunder. World Politics, 43(3), 414–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, D. C. (2002). Crony capitalism: Corruption and development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S. (2005). The business of lobbying in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. (2004). State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krug, B., & Hendrischke, H. (2008). Framing China: Transformation and institutional change through co-evolution. Management and Organization Review, 4(1), 81–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-Y. (2011). Taiwanese business or Chinese security asset: A changing pattern of interaction between Taiwanese business and Chinese governments. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberthal, K., & Oksenberg, M. (1988). Policy making in China: Leaders, structures, and processes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertha, A. C. (2005). China’s ‘soft’ centralization: Shifting Tiao/Kuai authority relations. China Quarterly, 184, 791–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montinola, G., Qian, Y., & Weigast, B. (1995). Federalism, Chinese style: The political basis for economic success in China. World Politics, 48(1), 50–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nee, V., & Opper, S. (2012). Capitalism from below: Markets and institutional change in China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, T.-W. (2008). Rent-seeking and economic governance in the structural nexus of corruption in China. Crime, Law and Social Change, 49(1), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, T.-W. (2009). The politics of rent production. In T.-W. Ngo & Y. Wu (Eds.), Rent seeking in China (pp. 1–21). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, T.-W., Yin, C., & Tang, Z. (2017). Scalar restructuring of the Chinese state: The subnational politics of development zones. Environment and Planning C (Politics and Space), 35(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oi, J. C. (1992). Fiscal reform and the economic foundations of local state corporatism in China. World Politics, 45(1), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oi, J. C. (1995). The role of the local state in China’s transitional economy. China Quarterly, 144, 1132–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parris, K. (1993). Local initiative and national reform: The Wenzhou model of development. China Quarterly, 134, 242–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, M. M. (2005). The business of governing business in China: Institutions and norms of the emerging regulatory state. World Politics, 57(2), 296–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei, M. (2008). China’s trapped transition: The limits of developmental autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, F. W. (1966). Thailand: The modernization of a bureaucratic polity. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saich, T. (2002). The blind man and the elephant: Analysing the local state in China. In L. Tomba (Ed.), East Asian capitalism: Conflicts, growth and crisis (pp. 75–99). Milano: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenman, R. (2005). Captains or pirates? State-business relations in post-socialist Poland. East European Politics and Societies, 19(1), 40–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, P. (1998). The riddle of Malaysian capitalism: Rent-seekers or real capitalists. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, A., & Thun, E. (2001). Thinking globally, acting locally: Local governments, industrial sectors, and development in China. Politics & Society, 29(4), 557–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidel, J. T. (1999). Capital, coercion, and crime: Bossism in the Philippines. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • So, A. (2003). Introduction: Rethinking the Chinese developmental miracle. In A. So (Ed.), China’s developmental miracle (pp. 3–26). New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, D. (1996). Recombinant property in East European capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4), 993–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, J., & Chan, A. (1995). China, corporatism, and the east Asian model. Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 33, 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, J., & Chan, A. (2008). Associations in a bind: The emergence of political corporatism. In J. Unger (Ed.), Associations and the Chinese state: Contested spaces (pp. 48–68). New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walder, A. (1995). Local government as industrial firms: An organizational analysis of China’s transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 101(2), 263–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wank, D. L. (1996). The institutional process of market Clientelism: Guanxi and private business in a South China city. China Quarterly, 147, 820–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. (1990). Business and politics: A comparative introduction. London: Chatham House.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woo-Cumings, M. (Ed.). (1999). The developmental state. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. (2004). Remaking the Chinese leviathan: Market transition and the politics of governance in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, J. (2013). State-led privatization in China: The politics of economic reform. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X. (2010). The institutional logic of collusion among local governments in China. Modern China, 36(1), 47–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ngo, TW. (2018). State–Business Relations in China’s Changing Economic Order. In: Zhang, X., Zhu, T. (eds) Business, Government and Economic Institutions in China. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64486-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics